Tag

Slider

Browsing

Speaker Mike Johnson said he told Senate Majority Leader John Thune he strongly disagreed with the Senate GOP’s inclusion of a provision in the government funding package allowing senators to sue if their electronic records are obtained without their knowledge.

“I don’t think that was the smart thing to do,” Johnson told reporters Wednesday night.

Of Thune, Johnson added, “I think he regretted the way it was done, and we had an honest conversation about that.”

The House voted late Wednesday on legislation to end the longest government shutdown in history that included a continuing resolution to fund federal operations through Jan. 30 and a “minibus” of three full-year appropriation bills for Department of Agriculture and the FDA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and military construction projects and the legislative branch.

Thune personally negotiated the inclusion of language in the legislative branch funding measure that would allow senators to receive a $500,000 payment if federal law enforcement obtains their electronic data and doesn’t notify them.

It was a direct response to recent revelations that eight Republican Senators had their phone records subpoenaed during former special counsel Jack Smith’s probe into President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

But even though Republicans on both sides of the Capitol are irate over Smith’s actions and want to haul Smith before lawmakers to testify, House Republicans were caught off guard by the provision and are now seeking to have it reversed.

Johnson announced Wednesday afternoon the House would vote on legislation next week to overturn it; it’s expected to pass with wide bipartisan support.

Separately, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan will hold a vote in his panel on a bill that would create stricter rules for the courts to approve non-disclosure orders often sought by federal law enforcement officials when conducting investigations. It passed the House in the previous Congress.

Jordan told reporters Wednesday there was no justification for Smith to seek a non-disclosure order when obtaining the senators’ phone data around the date of the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks on the Capitol.

Still, he did not appear to have an issue with clawing back the related provision in the government funding bill.

“Frankly, I would just say that we should pass laws for Americans, not for any special category,” he said.

A fellow Democrat moved to sanction Illinois Rep. Chuy García Wednesday for a gambit in which he retired and functionally guaranteed that his chief of staff would be the only Democrat on the ballot to succeed him.

Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington went to the House floor as lawmakers prepared to debate legislation reopening the government to introduce a resolution accusing García of “undermining the process of a free and fair election” and calling on the House to disapprove of his behavior.

Gluesenkamp Perez read her resolution aloud in its entirety, which calls García’s maneuver “beneath the dignity of his office and incompatible with the spirit of the Constitution.”

A spokesperson, Fabiola Rodriguez-Ciampoli, said García “made a deeply personal decision based on his health, his wife’s worsening condition and his responsibility to the grandchildren he is raising after the death of his daughter.”

“He followed every rule and every filing requirement laid out by the State of Illinois,” Rodriguez-Ciampoli added. “At a moment like this, he hopes his colleagues, especially those who speak about family values, can show the same compassion and respect that any family would want during a health crisis.”

Other Democrats reacted to the move with confusion and some hand-wringing about her decision to sow party disunity amid a big legislative moment.

“I think there are other ways to handle it, and I don’t think this is the best moment if it’s something you feel compelled to do,” said Rep. Rob Menendez (D-N.J.). “We’re in a messaging battle for all Americans right now.”

A seemingly angry House Minority Whip Katherine Clark was seen making an impassioned case to Gluesenkamp Perez on the floor before she sought recognition and offered her resolution. She then spoke with Perez after she had finished.

Gluesenkamp Perez’s resolution has special standing because it was offered as a “question of privileges of the House” and could see action in the House next week.

In her two terms on Capitol Hill representing one of the most swingy congressional districts in the country, Gluesenkamp Perez has made a name for herself by going against the grain. Earlier this year, she called for the new ethics standards to ensure that lawmakers were able to do their jobs “unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.”

Gluesenkamp Perez, in a statement, slammed García’s move as “fundamentally undemocratic.”

“Americans bled and died to secure the right to elect their leaders. We can’t expect to be taken seriously in the fight for free and fair elections if we turn a blind eye to election denial on our side of the aisle,” she said.

The House passed a government funding package late Wednesday that will close out the longest shutdown in history.

Members returned to Washington after a 54-day recess to vote on the shutdown-ending bill brokered across party lines in the Senate. They voted 222-209, with just a handful of Democrats breaking with their leadership to get the measure over the finish line.

President Donald Trump is expected to sign the measure into law before the end of the night, setting up federal operations to resume Thursday morning.

The package includes a three-bill “minibus” of full-year funding for the Department of Agriculture and the FDA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and military construction projects and the operations of Congress. The trio of bills is the result of months of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations between top appropriators.

Under the measure, all other agencies are funded through Jan. 30, giving some — but not much — time for another round of spending fights among appropriators who want to avoid another stopgap for the remainder of the fiscal year.

Two Republicans joined Democrats in opposition to the measure, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Greg Steube of Florida. Otherwise, Speaker Mike Johnson’s conference stuck together to back the funding package endorsed by the president.

Democrats were largely united in opposition to the package, which did not address their primary demand during the government shutdown: passage of legislation to extend enhanced tax credits under the Affordable Care Act that are set to expire at the end of the year, driving up premiums for more than 20 million Americans.

Under the terms of the agreement in the Senate, Democrats will get a vote in mid-December on a bill to extend the subsidies. The Democrats who negotiated the bipartisan arrangement lauded this concession from GOP leaders as a victory, and a chance to win over Republicans who might be convinced to pursue a compromise. But Speaker Mike Johnson was not part of these negotiations and has refused to promise a similar vote in the House.

House Democrats are furious about the concession from their Senate colleagues and believe they now have little to no leverage to force a vote on the extension many Republicans oppose as wasteful and impractical.

“There’s only two ways that this fight will end,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a floor speech before the vote. “Either Republicans finally decide to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits this year, or the American people will throw Republicans out of their jobs next year and end the speakership of Donald J. Trump once and for all.”

Still, six moderate Democrats ended up siding with Republicans to end the shutdown. Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, the only Democrat to vote for the stopgap back in September, voted “yes” again. He was joined by Reps. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, Adam Gray of California, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Tom Suozzi of New York and Don Davis of North Carolina.

“I think the progress the Democrats have made by actually getting a year extension on the SNAP program in the Agriculture bill specifically is appropriate,” said Gray in explaining his support. “We need to take the poor families and working families that are in need of these programs out of the middle of a fight that was never appropriate.”

While House members were not involved in the handshake agreements that were forged in the Senate to win Democratic votes, House appropriators were involved in negotiating the minibus.

House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) on Tuesday night at the House Rules Committee meeting celebrated that House earmarks survived the bicameral conference for both the military construction and agriculture divisions, “reflecting Congress’ clear control over the power of the purse” at a time when the Trump administration has repeatedly moved to make its own decisions about government spending.

The agreement negotiated in the Senate, which paved the way for enough Democrats to agree to advance the funding package, included a guarantee that the White House would rehire all federal employees who were fired early in the shutdown as part of the administration’s “reductions in force” across agencies. The White House has also pledged that all federal workers would receive back pay for the duration of the shutdown.

Agencies will be required to give written notice to Congress that it has both delivered the back pay and rehired laid-off employees.

Future blanket firings would be limited with a broad prohibition on reductions in force in any department or agency at least until the Jan. 30 end date of the continuing resolution.

Eleventh-hour controversy emerged as House lawmakers on both sides of the aisle balked at a provision originating in the Senate that would allow senators, but not House members, to sue the government for having their electronic data collected without their knowledge.

The language was tucked into the portion of the minibus that funds the operations of Congress by Senate Majority Leader John Thune and without consultation with appropriators in his chamber or leadership in the House. It could allow eight Republican senators to receive a $500,000 payout each following revelations that their phone records were subpoenaed as part of former special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.

The GOP grumblings played out Tuesday night during a House Rules Committee hearing on the funding bill, with Republican Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Morgan Griffith of Virginia and Austin Scott of Georgia describing their disapproval. Scott said the provision should be removed, while Chip called it a “self-serving, self-dealing” provision. Cole said he was “surprised” to see the provision added and questioned whether it should be included.

House Republicans didn’t tank the funding package over the provision but already have plans to hold a vote to reverse the language next week once the government is reopened, though it is unlikely the Senate would take up that standalone bill.

“I’m not voting to give Lindsey Graham half a million dollars,” Steube told reporters ahead of the vote. He was referring to the South Carolina Republican who was among those singled out in Smith’s investigation.

Nicholas Wu contributed to this report.

House Democrats are back at work — and, boy, are they mad.

They’re mad at the Senate Democrats who cut them out of negotiations and cut the deal to reopen the government after a record 43-day shutdown. They’re mad at Speaker Mike Johnson for keeping the House out of session all that time for what they’re calling a “seven-week paid vacation.” And they’re mad that, after all that, there’s still no clear path forward on meeting their key demand — an extension of health insurance subsidies that expire next month.

Their fury was evident across the Capitol in the 24 hours leading up to Wednesday’s decisive vote reopening the government as they took stock of a long, bitter fight that ended without a clear win and left many spoiling for fights and in little mood to compromise with Republicans.

That sour mood stands to linger with another shutdown deadline approaching in January and members hoping to somehow forge a bipartisan compromise on the insurance subsidies in the coming weeks.

“The Senate says they will have a vote [on the subsidies],” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. “Do I trust any of them? Hell no.”

Speaking to reporters ahead of the final vote Wednesday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries vowed to keep up the fight — even as Democrats’ procedural options remain limited. One casualty of the shutdown was Jeffries’ once-cordial relationship with Johnson, which descended into mudslinging as the standoff ground on and frustration mounted.

“Institutionally, Mike Johnson did great damage to the House of Representatives by castrating his Republican majority and keeping his extremists on a taxpayer-funded vacation for more than seven weeks,” Jeffries said.

The “vacation” epithet was a popular one for Democrats returning to the Capitol this week, and it grated on the ears of Republicans who blame the other party’s intransigence for the record shutdown.

During a late-night hearing Tuesday, Rules Committee Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) interrupted Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) after she sarcastically welcomed Republicans back from the extended recess.

“I am sick and tired of hearing you say we had an eight-week vacation,” Foxx said. “I worked every day — I don’t know about you — but I don’t want to hear another soul say that.”

Ansari refused to back off: “I hope you all enjoyed yourselves while American families [were] terrified that their health insurance premiums were going to double or triple,” she fired back

Adding to the partisan tension surrounding the shutdown was Johnson’s decision not only to keep the House out of session but to also not swear in Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz) until the shutdown ended.

Democrats packed the House floor for Grijalva’s swearing-in Wednesday. Rep. Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.), introducing his new colleague, at first joked about how “it has been a minute since we have all been together” before levying more heated attacks on Johnson.

“At one point, the speaker said, ‘Bless her heart, she is representative-elect, she doesn’t know how it works around here,’” Stanton said. “Bless his heart, because here’s how it should work … When the American people vote, this chamber respects their will and seats them immediately. Politics should never come into play.”

In her own speech, Grijalva criticized Republican leaders for denying her district “access to the basic services that every constituent deserves.”

“This is an abuse of power,” she said. “One individual should not be able to unilaterally obstruct the swearing in of a duly elected member of congress for political reasons.”

But Grijalva and Johnson were all smiles when they posed together after she was formally sworn into the House.

“I really like this lady. I think she’s going to be an excellent member of Congress,” Johnson said.

Republicans displayed some anger of their own Wednesday. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) used his floor time to decry Democrats for their “extremist” positions and sparking the record shutdown. “You should all be ashamed of yourselves for inflicting this pain on the American people … not paying our troops, our federal employees, our air traffic controllers,” he shouted. “It’s a disgrace, and you should all hang your heads in shame.”

That prompted a warning from Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), who was presiding over the House at the time, to cool things down: “I fully recognize that there’s a lot of pent-up anxiety and emotions have been elevated somewhat, but please.”

The tensions stand to color the House’s work over the coming weeks. Johnson is promising additional session days and late nights to catch up on the weeks of lost legislative time.

To jump-start progress on the expiring insurance subsidies, Democrats launched a longshot procedural maneuver known as a discharge petition to force a three-year extension of the credits for a vote, but it is unlikely enough Republicans will sign on to ensure its success. More likely, any compromise will have to be forged in the Senate, something in which House Democrats showed little faith this week.

And then there’s the next spending deadline, coming on Jan. 30, when many of the factors that led up to the shutdown over the last seven weeks are likely to be unchanged. Leading up to the 43-day shutdown, Democrats pushed for funding guardrails on the Trump administration in addition to the health care provisions — and got neither in the end.

“I do think at some point it is important for Democrats to have a backbone and really fight for the American people,” said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).

“I’m not going to vote to endorse their cruelty,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) when asked about the prospect of another shutdown. “And that’s the way I view them not extending the ACA tax credits.”

Jeffries separately cautioned that a laundry list of other items on the House’s agenda, including passage of the annual defense authorization bill, could be threatened if Republicans cut Democrats out of the process.

“The business of the American people must continue, but the red line will be if Republicans continue to adopt the my-way-or-the-highway approach,” he said. “At that point, we’ll continue to say, ‘Get lost.’”

Speaker Mike Johnson said Wednesday he plans to hold a House vote next week on a measure mandating the full disclosure of Justice Department files related to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Johnson announced those plans just hours after newly sworn Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) completed a discharge petition mandating a floor vote on the Epstein measure. His is a quicker timeline than is mandated under the rules governing discharge petitions, which would require a vote in early December.

House Republicans are eager to put the Epstein controversy in the rear-view mirror to the greatest extent possible as they seek to catch up after losing weeks of work due to Johnson’s decision to keep the chamber out of session during the government shutdown.

They are expecting a mass defection of Republican lawmakers on the vote — perhaps 100 or more — despite President Donald Trump calling the Epstein allegations a Democratic hoax.

The House is on track to vote on disclosing files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after a newly sworn-in Democrat completed a bipartisan effort Wednesday to sidestep Republican leaders over the opposition of President Donald Trump.

Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona signed the discharge petition immediately after she was sworn in by Speaker Mike Johnson after a record 50-day wait and delivered remarks critical of the GOP attempts to keep Justice Department files under wraps.

“It’s past time for Congress to restore its role as a check and balance on this administration,” she said, adding, “That is why I will sign the discharge petition right now to release the Epstein files — justice cannot wait another day.”

The vote is expected in early December, according to aides from both parties.

Grijalva had expressed no special interest in the Epstein case prior to her Sept. 23 election. But she became intertwined in the fate of a bipartisan effort to disclose Justice Department files related to the disgraced financier after it became clear she could provide the final necessary signature on a discharge petition forcing a House vote on the matter.

She has had to wait seven weeks to do that, however, with Johnson refusing to seat her as the House stayed out of session for the duration of the government shutdown.

Democrats have railed against the speaker, accusing him of seeking to propagate an Epstein coverup on behalf of Trump. Johnson, in turn, said the wait had nothing to do with Epstein and everything to do with Senate Democrats’ refusal to pass a House-approved measure to reopen the government. The lengthy delay prompted a lawsuit by the Arizona attorney general that is now rendered moot.

Grijalva played down her connection to the Epstein push in a brief interview Wednesday, saying it was “not what I was elected to do.” But she added that she still planned to sign: “It sort of continues this push that the American people have to really demand transparency and consequences, legal consequences for anyone implicated in those files.”

Her addition to the House also narrows Republicans’ majority to 219-214, meaning Johnson can now lose only two votes if all members are voting. Grijalva’s first votes will be on the funding package to end the shutdown.

Grijalva, a former member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors, won a special election to fill the seat held by her late father Rep. Raúl Grijalva, a longtime progressive leader, who died in March at 77.

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

House Democrats believe there will be overwhelming support from Republicans on an inevitable floor vote on a bill that would compel the Justice Department to quickly release materials related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker Mike Johnson is scheduled Wednesday afternoon to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose addition to the House will provide the 218th vote on a so-called discharge petition — a procedural maneuver that allows rank-and-file members to end-run leadership and force the vote on legislation, in this case the measure demanding the release of the Epstein files.

Assuming the bill gets passed in the House, it would still require approval by the Senate and to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. Senate GOP leaders have not guaranteed they would hold a vote in their chamber.

But Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the co-sponsor of the bill with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), told reporters Wednesday he believed “40 to 50” Republicans would join Democrats in supporting the bill in the House.

“If we get that kind of overwhelming vote, that’s going to push the Senate, and it’s going to push for a release of the files from the Justice Department,” Khanna said.

Trump officials are still waging an intense pressure campaign to get at least one of three House Republican women to remove their name from the discharge effort, according to two people granted anonymity to share private conversations. If that push is successful, it would complicate efforts to get the measure on the floor in the first place, as Republicans are more likely to vote in favor of the legislation itself than they are to sign onto a discharge petition seen as an outwardly antagonistic gesture toward leadership.

Democrats’ optimism is growing, though, following the release of an explosive new email suggesting that Trump knew of Epstein’s sex trafficking activities. That correspondence was singled out by Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, part of a huge tranche of files from the Epstein estate the panel rolled out Wednesday. Republicans have claimed Democrats were selectively releasing the materials as part of an effort to damage Trump.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the Oversight panel, maintained that his team publicized key documents as soon as they were able to review the trove of new materials.

“It’s always interesting that Republicans … only when we release a certain batch, will they then follow up and say, ‘Oh, you shouldn’t release that,’” he told reporters.

Garcia said he had “talked to numerous Republicans that are planning to vote ‘yes.’”

House Judiciary ranking member Jamie Raskin of Maryland said in an interview that the new materials confirmed long-held suspicions among Democrats about Trump’s ties to Epstein.

“Of course, Donald Trump knew what was going on,” Raskin said. “Jeffrey Epstein was his best friend, and there’s a reason that they flocked together.”

Trump has denied wrongdoing in relation to the Epstein allegations. No evidence has so far suggested that Trump took part in Epstein’s trafficking operation. The president also has maintained that he and Epstein had a falling out years ago.

Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

The White House committed in writing Wednesday that President Donald Trump will sign the bill to end the longest government shutdown in U.S. history once the House passes it.

In a statement of administration policy, the Trump administration urged every lawmaker to back the measure, which would reopen the government through Jan. 30 and fund some federal agencies through next September. The House is expected to vote Wednesday evening to clear the legislation for Trump’s signature, after the Senate passed the package Monday night.

Even as the White House encouraged House lawmakers to vote in support of the bipartisan measure, the administration took partisan swipes in the official memo, claiming that the funding lapse was “forced upon the American people by congressional Democrats.”

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has won the backing of a key Republican senator who had earlier threatened to vote against him over concerns about the agency’s handling of workplace harassment.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said he will support acting FDIC Chair Travis Hill, who is Trump’s pick to permanently lead the agency. Kennedy’s endorsement clears a major hurdle for Hill, whose nomination has broad backing from the banking industry and other Senate Republicans, and paves the way for a vote in the Senate Banking Committee.

Kennedy last month threw up a surprise roadblock when he said he wouldn’t vote for Hill until the FDIC produced a report detailing how it has addressed sexual harassment and other workplace misconduct. Kennedy said at the time he had “heard nothing” from Hill about the issue since he took over as acting chair in January.

“I am satisfied with the progress the agency is making,” Kennedy said in a statement Tuesday. “I intend to vote to confirm Mr. Travis Hill as FDIC Chairman. This is no country for creepy old men.”

Kennedy’s office released the FDIC report he requested, which outlined “long-overdue plans” to improve the agency’s workplace culture and confirmed that progress was underway.

According to the report, 26 employees “left the agency specifically due to substantiated allegations of misconduct” in the 2025 fiscal year— either because they were fired or resigned before they could be terminated. The report also detailed previously announced efforts to revamp the complaint process, bolster training and establish new offices focused on professional conduct and cracking down on harassment.

“I have instituted new leadership across the agency, and today not a single FDIC executive with substantiated allegations of misconduct remains with the agency,” Hill wrote in the report.

The issue drew scrutiny from Democrats as well. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the Banking Committee’s top Democrat, criticized Hill at his confirmation hearing last month, arguing there was “no record” he took action to address the FDIC’s toxic workplace culture before it was exposed in 2023.

The revelations about widespread harassment and discrimination, which emerged during the Biden administration, engulfed former FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg’s final months in office last year. Under pressure from lawmakers, the longtime Democratic appointee agreed to step down in May 2024 once a successor was confirmed. But the Senate never voted on President Joe Biden’s nominee. Gruenberg ultimately resigned the day before Trump’s second inauguration earlier this year.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez laid the blame Wednesday for a disappointing deal ending the 43-day government shutdown at the feet of Senate Democrats as a whole — not just Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — noting there were “eight Democrats who coordinated” with Republicans to end the standoff.

“There’s a lot of focus rightfully on Leader Schumer, but I do think that when it comes to the Senate, it is Senate Democrats that select their leadership,” Ocasio-Cortez said about her fellow New York Democrat in a brief interview. “And so I actually think this problem is much bigger than Leader Schumer.”

Ocasio-Cortez, a leader of the party’s progressive wing, put Schumer on blast in March after he voted to advance Republican legislation to keep the government open. Some House Democrats have privately floated support for a potential Ocasio-Cortez primary bid against Schumer in 2028, something she has neither embraced nor ruled out.

Asked on Wednesday if she has confidence in Schumer as leader, Ocasio-Cortez said she “certainly disagreed with what just happened.”

“We had a responsibility to develop, to deliver on health care subsidies, and the Senate failed to do that,” she added.

Ocasio-Cortez, in later remarks to reporters, acknowledged the calls for her to mount a 2028 Senate run, potentially against Schumer, but again sidestepped questions about her intentions.

“That is years from now,” she said. “I have to remind my own constituents, because they think that this election is this year.”

Schumer did not endorse or vote for the agreement that eight members of his caucus reached with Republicans that will reopen the government open but will not guarantee an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act tax credits that Democrats are fighting for. But those calling for new leadership point to the fact that he couldn’t keep his caucus together and didn’t do more to head off the effort.

At least five House Democrats have called for Schumer to step aside as the party’s leader in the Senate. No Democratic senators have done so.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this report misstated Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s title.