Tag

Slider

Browsing

Donald Trump, Mike Johnson and John Thune’s big meeting didn’t do anything to settle Republicans’ mounting legislative headaches.

But GOP leaders are indicating they’re going to move forward on at least one area. They’re nearing agreement on government funding totals and hope to finalize a number and inform impatient members in the coming days, according to two people granted anonymity to speak freely about the behind-the-scenes talks.

That’s a good sign for appropriators, who reiterated Tuesday night that they want some clearer answers on the spending bills — as soon as this morning’s private House GOP conference meeting. Energy and Water Subcommittee Chair Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.) said they’ve been “hoping for a topline number for months.”

“Quite frankly, we’re a little angry that we did all of our work, busted our butts to get it done by July, and here we are,” Rep. John Rutherford (R-Fla.) added.

A strategy on reconciliation still hasn’t come together, though. Trump reiterated his preference for one sweeping bill over two packages to Johnson and Thune on Tuesday. But once the leaders returned to the Hill, the clash over how to proceed continued.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) said the one-bill strategy was settled, while Thune indicated he was still open to his chamber splitting off tax policies from the border and energy goals.

Here’s what else we’re watching today:

  • Hegseth, Ratcliffe, Noem: Thune filed cloture on Tuesday night on these three nominees: John Ratcliffe for CIA director, Pete Hegseth for Defense secretary, and Kristi Noem for DHS secretary. The three are now set to get confirmation votes this week, and are expected to come up in that order. We’re watching to see how much Democrats are going to fight against the nominees, specifically after Hegseth’s former sister-in-law alleged he had caused his second wife to fear for her safety
  • Other nominees: Russell Vought has his second confirmation hearing scheduled for OMB Director, this time in the Senate Budget Committee. Transportation secretary nominee Sean Duffy will get a confirmation vote in the Senate Commerce Committee.
  • TikTok Split: Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee who led the effort to pass legislation banning TikTok last year are grappling with how to respond to Trump’s executive order to give the company a reprieve. Members of the panel will soon be formally briefed on Trump’s action, according to a committee Republican granted anonymity to share private details. 
  • Laken Riley Act: The GOP’s first immigration bill of the new Congress will get its final passage vote in the House today, and is expected to clear the chamber and head to Trump’s desk.

Want this in your inbox by 5 a.m.? Subscribe to our Inside Congress newsletter here.

Jordain Carney and Ben Leonard contributed to this report.

Just hours into his second presidency, Donald Trump was already bulldozing congressional Republicans.

He granted clemency to some 1,500 Jan. 6 offenders, some of them convicted of violent assaults. He flouted a bipartisan TikTok ban, ordering it to remain unenforced. And he moved to cancel some of his predecessor’s energy programs over the pleadings of some in the GOP who wanted him to wait — to name just a few of the ways he undercut members of his own party.

A day later, it was as if a switch had been flipped.

In a meeting Tuesday with top GOP leaders, he didn’t move to settle key strategic disputes over raising the debt limit and passing the party’s big domestic policy package. Top leaders from the House and Senate left the White House and gave reporters completely contradictory accounts of how his agenda would be passed.

In other words, Trump is already showing his split-screen approach to congressional relations — one that, so far, is more concerned with using his political muscle to perform acts of dominance than to settle the intramural disputes that are holding up his agenda.

The past two days underscore how Trump and his team view Capitol Hill, informed by his previous four years in office, and the four subsequent years he spent climbing back: Republicans will eventually fall in line with whatever he wants, they believe, so why hold back?

“The sooner these guys recognize that it’s the president that kept their House majority and their Senate majority, and the sooner they realize it’s the president that has the will of the people — not them — the sooner they will be able to live a productive life,” one Trump insider granted anonymity to discuss relations with Congress told me recently.

“At the end of the day, he’s the one with the mandate, and they know it,” said another.

There was immediate evidence that such a read is absolutely correct.

Faced with questions about Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons, most GOP lawmakers opted for a delicate tap dance. Many deflected attention to predecessor Joe Biden’s pardons of family members. Others quickly dusted off the old first-term playbook: I didn’t see the tweet/comment/executive order.

“I haven’t seen the list,“ Speaker Mike Johnson told my colleague Meredith Lee Hill. “I haven’t had a chance to evaluate it.”

And when Trump essentially flipped them the bird on TikTok — putting off dealing with something they’ve described for years as a major national security issue — nary a squawk was heard. Johnson and Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) spoke out Sunday to reiterate their support for the nine-month-old ban, only to be neutered a day later.

Same goes for Trump’s first-day decision to gut Biden’s electric vehicle mandates. Hill leaders wanted to repeal it themselves so they could book the savings and use them to offset the cost of tax cuts. Trump bullied forward anyway.

He even burned political capital on a molehill of a mountain: re-renaming Denali to Mount McKinley over the objections of Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan.

The past two days underscore how Trump and his team view Capitol Hill: Republicans will eventually fall in line with whatever he wants, they believe, so why hold back?

A more traditional politician might consider it risky to wildly alienate members of your own party (especially a known swing vote like Murkowski) when much of your agenda requires congressional approval — doubly so when you have a House majority even narrower than in the Senate.

Not so for Trump, obviously. Yet the alpha-male power plays suddenly evaporate when it comes to settling disputes among Republicans about his own agenda.

The chambers remain on diverging paths when it comes to passing border, energy and tax measures, with the House pushing one vote on one massive bill while the Senate wants to split it in two. Same for the debt limit: Include it in a party-line budget reconciliation bill? Or cut a deal with Democrats?

Some Republicans were hoping Trump would use his audience with Hill leaders at the White House on Tuesday to crack the whip on those questions and others. That doesn’t seem to have happened: One senior Republican aide we spoke to afterward couldn’t hide his disappointment; Trump continued to waffle rather than provide clarity.

That’s despite complaining in the meeting, as he often does, about how Democrats always stick together and Republicans instead bicker and fracture. He insisted on unity but didn’t do much to facilitate it.

Which is partly why Trump’s whatever-I-want posture early on is raising so many eyebrows among some Republicans. The president, they believe, will have to spend some of the political capital he seems intent on burning now to get his agenda passed later.

A key test is at hand, with some of Trump’s most controversial nominees headed toward confirmation votes that will force some Senate Republicans to eat a “shit sandwich,” as one Republican aide told me on Inauguration Day.

Pete Hegseth, his pick for Pentagon chief, is teed up for a vote within days despite a late-breaking report that he’d made an ex-wife “fear for her safety.” (The woman denied she’d been physically abused.) And many senators remain uncomfortable with his choice of Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, with her isolationist views and policy flipflops.

They haven’t even gotten yet to his plans for tariffs — not only on China but allies like Mexico and Canada — potential levies that have given traditional pro-business Republicans heartburn for months.

If Republicans fall in line behind Hegseth, Gabbard and tariffs — as most now expect — it will be proof positive that Trump’s steamroller approach is working.

“From his end, he’s doing what he said he would do, so this notion that we’re going to have any ability to stop him from doing what he feels is right is laughable,” said one senior GOP aide. “It’s just not happening.”

So who cares if he isn’t sweating the small stuff?

Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee who led the effort to pass legislation banning TikTok last year will soon be formally briefed on President Donald Trump’s executive order to give the company a reprieve.

The member briefing, confirmed in an interview by a committee Republican granted anonymity to share details of the upcoming private meeting, comes as GOP members of the panel grapple with how to respond to the president’s latest curveball.

“We all know Donald Trump is a negotiator,” Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), a senior Energy and Commerce member who worked on the legislation, said in an interview. “Regardless of whether there was a little or some significant progress, I think he wants the opportunity to try to move it along.”

The law allows a president to give a 90 day-extension if there is “significant progress” in divesting from Chinese ownership.

“We built that into legislation so that if the president wanted to, they could extend it,” said another senior committee member, Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) in an interview. “They have got to sell or figure something else out.”

What’s less clear is how Trump plans to argue that discussions involving the current owner, ByteDance, met that “significant progress” benchmark, though China has signaled new openness to a deal in recent days.

Republicans who sit on the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee expended significant political capital last year to report out a bill, in a 50-0 vote, to force the wildly popular social media app to either divest from Chinese ownership — deemed a potential national security risk to the U.S. — or shutter.

The legislation was later voted on by the full House, 352-65, before the Senate cleared the legislation as part of a larger government funding package.

The Supreme Court last Friday ruled TikTok had run out of time to find a new buyer, but Trump promised to intervene, on Monday making good on that pledge by giving ByteDance 75 days to find a solution.

At the time of the high court’s ruling, Republicans on the Energy and Commerce Committee cheered the news in public statements. They have, however, been quiet since the new president’s intervention. That includes the full committee chair, Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), and the chair of the Telecommunications and Technology Subcommittee, Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), who is also the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Unlike Republicans, Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee didn’t hold back their frustration in what they saw as having their legislative product undermined.

“[Trump] is circumventing national security legislation,” committee ranking member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said in a statement. “I do not believe ByteDance has taken any real actions to sell TikTok so far.”

Less than 24 hours after President Donald Trump’s Day One blitz of executive actions, Democrats on Capitol Hill mobilized Tuesday to fight his move to freeze a broad range of federal cash.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and other top House Democrats held a private call on Tuesday with more than 100 people, including leaders of outside groups, to discuss government funding strategy and how to stop Trump from violating so-called impoundment law by usurping Congress’ “power of the purse,” according to three people familiar with the call.

People on the call included advocates for a federal program granting food assistance to pregnant women and babies and the Head Start early education program.

It’s Democratic leadership’s first steps in coordinating a united front against what they see as the Trump administration’s violation of impoundment law, which is meant to block presidents from withholding money Congress has previously passed through the Congressional appropriations process.

Congressional Democrats are still trying to figure out exactly what funding Trump intends to freeze after the president’s barrage of executive orders Monday night that would cut off funding Congress previously appropriated. Those orders call broadly for federal agencies to pause foreign assistance to Ukraine and other countries, as well as halt money already contracted under Democrats’ signature climate and spending law known as the Inflation Reduction Act.

Whether Trump’s executive orders hold up in court will be a major test of any president’s power to unilaterally withhold funding Congress has cleared — specifically whether such an action undermines lawmakers’ “Article I” authority under the Constitution to control the government purse strings.

Once it is clear what accounts Trump is targeting through these executive orders, Democrats can determine who is being “harmed” and has legal standing to challenge the president’s orders in court.

“There are a whole array of political countermeasures that one could undertake in terms of having standing to sue, to vindicate the will of Congress,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), the former chair of the Senate Budget Committee, said in a brief interview on Tuesday.

Besides a state or an organization representing people affected, a committee chair or party leader could potentially be “suitably implicated” to challenge Trump’s orders in court, said Whitehouse, who is also a former attorney general of Rhode Island and is also tracking the impoundment issue.

Democrats are planning other strategies to counter Trump’s orders to freeze funding, too, from a messaging standpoint, including by highlighting the ways Americans are hurt by the president’s moves.

“The President spent his first day in office stealing from American taxpayers,” the House’s top Democratic appropriator, Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, said in a statement Tuesday night. “In the coming weeks, I will be focused on sharing with the American people the direct consequences of undercutting these investments.”

Democrats also plan to push for a federal probe into the legality of Trump’s moves to freeze funding. During Trump’s first presidency, the Government Accountability Office concluded on multiple occasions that the administration violated the law by withholding Ukraine aid and other funding.

Russ Vought, who was in charge of freezing that funding during Trump’s first presidency in his capacity as the White House budget director, is now seeking confirmation to a second stint leading the Office of Management and Budget.

Vought already told senators during his first confirmation hearing last week before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that Trump believes it is unconstitutional for the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require the executive branch to spend money as Congress prescribes.

As Vought prepares to testify on Wednesday before the Senate Budget Committee in his second confirmation hearing necessary to secure the OMB job, Democratic senators are ready to question the nominee specifically about the legality of Trump’s new executive orders.

The Senate Judiciary Committee intends to hold a confirmation hearing for President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the FBI, Kash Patel, on Jan. 29, committee ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told reporters on Tuesday.

If that date stands, it would coincide with the panel’s scheduled vote the same day to report out the nomination of Pam Bondi, Trump’s selection for attorney general.

Durbin, along with Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), said he has now received Patel’s background investigation materials, which are required for every Cabinet nomination in advance of a confirmation hearing.

Durbin emphasized, however, that he would not be supporting Patel’s confirmation, pointing to the “trail of grievances” in his book “Government Gangsters,” which the senator said he read before meeting with Patel in a recent one-on-one meeting.

“Kash Patel has neither the experience, the judgment, nor the temperament to serve as head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” Durbin said.

Durbin also said he would meet later this week with Trump’s nominee to run the Department of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins.

House Democrats have named their members to serve on the DOGE Subcommittee on Oversight, signaling the minority party is ready to play ball on a Republican-led effort.

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) will serve as the ranking member, joined by D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and Reps. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, Greg Casar of Texas, Jasmine Crockett of Texas and Robert Garcia of California. The ranking member of the full Oversight and Government Reform, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), will sit on the subcommittee in an ex officio capacity.

Two people familiar with the appointments confirmed the Democratic roster on Tuesday evening.

Republicans announced their subcommittee assignments earlier in the day Tuesday. They’ll be led on their side of the aisle by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).

The subcommittee will be a partnership with Elon Musk’s commission to cut government spending, formally called the Department of Government Efficiency.

President Donald Trump prodded congressional leaders to consider recess appointments for his top nominees and expressed interest in trading California wildfire aid for a debt limit increase in a White House meeting Tuesday — resurfacing two controversial proposals floated during the returning president’s transition.

The discussions, which were described by two people granted anonymity to describe the private talks, also touched on his proposal to exempt at least some tip income from federal taxes and his efforts more generally to extend tax cuts.

Trump also emphasized the need for Republicans to stick together as a party: “The one thing the Democrats have going for them is they stick together,” one of the people familiar with the meeting said, paraphrasing Trump’s message. “No grandstanding — just stick together and deliver and we will win.”

Trump’s controversial pardons of Jan. 6 riot offenders did not come up, Speaker Mike Johnson said in an interview after the meeting.

The recess appointments push first surfaced last year after the election, when it appeared that several of Trump’s Cabinet appointments could get snarled in the Senate. Recess appointments could allow some nominees to take office at least temporarily without a confirmation vote.

But talk of using the dormant power ebbed as Trump’s nominees, such as Defense pick Pete Hegseth, improved their standing with Republican senators.

As for the fire-aid-for-debt-limit trade, GOP lawmakers who first raised the idea with Trump at recent Mar-a-Lago meetings said he was interested in the prospect at the time. That would mean making a debt limit hike part of a larger agreement around the bipartisan government funding talks.

The wider House and Senate GOP leadership teams met with Trump for more than a hour Tuesday as they tried to hash out the way forward on his early agenda.

Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune want sign-offs from Trump on a series of key decisions on the Republican agenda. GOP leadership and Trump’s team held several calls this past weekend during which they tried to form more of a consensus on the way forward before the Tuesday meeting.

They want Trump to make play calls on some of their biggest intra-party fights, including how to move a sweeping tax policy, what to do about the swirling debt limit fight and the mid-March government funding deadline.

Getting Trump’s blessing for how to tackle the fiscal battles could help Johnson mollify his hard-liners, unify his thin conference and satisfy growing concerns that he’s losing precious time to get going. Johnson has struggled to unite his conference, where he has a one-vote margin.

At the same time, having Trump articulate what he wants also lowers the risk that Johnson or Thune find themselves at odds with the leader of their party if they were to outline their own strategy just to have Trump disagree with it. Thune found himself in that position after he laid out his plan for a two-bill reconciliation only for Trump to embrace one bill, while leaving the door open for two.

But Trump himself admits he doesn’t care how GOP leaders accomplish his vast legislative agenda — just that they do it, and quickly. One senior Republican noted Trump in a recent interview appeared to confuse reconciliation with the government funding process, by arguing Republicans could add wildfire aid to the GOP party-line bill in order to secure some Democratic votes.

And some Senate Republicans are already acknowledging that ultimately much of their strategy will be what can get through the House.

“The Senate and the House are two very different bodies. And on the Republican side, in both the House and Senate, we both have free-range chickens that wander off but frankly ours are easier to catch than the House,” said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who said he’s spoken to Johnson and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.).

Jordain Carney contributed to this report.

Democrats let Secretary of State Marco Rubio blitz to Senate confirmation Monday. Now it’s time for trench warfare.

With Donald Trump’s nominees slowly emerging from Senate committees, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are preparing for a weekslong slog as Democrats force Republicans to work through procedural obstacles to fill out the new president’s Cabinet.

CIA director pick John Ratcliffe is expected to get a relatively smooth bipartisan confirmation on Tuesday. But after that, more controversial nominees await, and cooperation could be hard to come by.

Accelerating any confirmation will require unanimous agreement from senators, and after letting Rubio through, Democrats are not eager to ease the way for many other Trump picks.

“I don’t think the Democrats are in any hurry,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said in an interview. “So I think we’re just gonna have to grind through, and maybe you’re here for some late nights and weekends for the next few weeks.”

Topping the list of more troublesome nominees is Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon pick who has weathered allegations ranging from sexual misconduct to financial mismanagement. But Republicans appear arrayed behind Hegseth, who has denied the allegations, and they are ready to undertake what could be a four-day process to get him confirmed.

Russell Vought, Trump’s pick for White House budget director, is also bitterly divisive, emerging from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Monday on a party line vote. Homeland Security secretary nominee Kristi Noem could also be subject to an extended confirmation timeline, despite winning some Democratic support in committee.

The nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for HHS secretary and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence are still awaiting committee action but are expected to spark major fights should they come to the floor.

“Democrats have been very clear about our approach to President Trump’s nominees,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor Monday. “We will neither rubber-stamp nominees we feel are grossly unqualified nor oppose nominees that deserve serious consideration.”

Rubio, he said, fell in the latter category, “a qualified nominee we think should be confirmed quickly.”

For most Trump nominees, the outcome is not in question. Republicans can confirm any of them so long as they stick together, but to do so without eating up days of time they need help from Democrats. Any one senator can object to a deal speeding confirmation votes.

Already Republicans are using the threat of Friday votes and even rarer weekend sessions to issue a warning to Democrats: Play ball and ease the path for Trump’s picks or don’t, you’re only inconveniencing yourselves.

Those threats could come to a head this week if Thune tees up Hegseth’s Defense nomination on Tuesday. Republicans are confident of his confirmation even though a few in the GOP ranks haven’t yet said if they will support him.

By the end of the week, Republicans will have more nominees ready for floor action: Committees are set to vote on former Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.) to be Transportation secretary, Lee Zeldin to be EPA administrator and Doug Burgum to be Interior secretary, among others

To get cooperation from Democrats to speed things up, some GOP senators have been making direct appeals. Cornyn said he used the traditional post-inauguration luncheon in Statuary Hall to lean on Schumer, his sometime gym buddy, to relent on some of Trump’s “uncontroversial” nominations but said he didn’t seem to be in a “big hurry.”

Thune acknowledged Monday that confirming Trump’s picks won’t be instantaneous, calling it their “priority here in the Senate for the next few weeks.”

Some of Trump’s more controversial picks have already been subject to delays due to missing background checks and disclosures. Two of Trump’s most controversial picks — Kennedy and Gabbard — haven’t yet had their hearings scheduled.

“Pete’s going to be fine. Marco’s a slam dunk. There are a few left that it depends on how they do,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) before adding of Gabbard: “Let’s see how she does. I’m inclined to vote for everybody, but you’ve got to get through the system.”

Several Republican senators are roundly criticizing President Donald Trump’s pardons of Jan. 6 rioters — particularly those convicted of violent crimes, like assaulting law enforcement officers.

“I’m disappointed to see that and I do fear the message that is sent to these brave men and women that stood by us,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) echoed that sentiment, saying there was a difference between those “caught up in the crowd who did not commit a violent act” and those who committed violent crimes, like destroying property or assaulting officers, who should not be pardoned.

Many of the Republicans expressing dismay at Trump’s actions were the usual suspects — more centrist senators and those who had voted to convict Trump during an impeachment trial over his role in stoking the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. But more mainstream Republicans also made clear that they were unhappy, like Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota saying he would “not defend” Trump’s decision. Several were quick to also condemn the actions of former President Joe Biden, who had given preemptive pardons to his own family members shortly before he left office.

“Anybody who committed violence, like the violence in Kenosha and the violence in Portland before them, should be in prison — period, full stop,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), “That segment of pardons — I’m as disappointed as I am with all the pardons that Biden did.”

“Neither action builds confidence in our Justice Department,” Collins added.

He drew a distinction between the pardons of the rioters with convictions for violence crimes with “boneheads caught up in the moment that after the building was breached that didn’t see the police officers being crushed.”

Trump on Monday pardoned about 1,500 people who had taken part in the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection and commuted the sentences of fourteen people. He’d also directed the Justice Department to drop the 470 ongoing criminal cases against Jan. 6 defendants.

“It’s not right. People who assaulted police officers — if they do the crime, they should do the time,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.). He, Collins and Murkowski had all voted to convict Trump in early 2021.

Even Vice President JD Vance had previously said those who committed violence on Jan. 6 “obviously” shouldn’t receive a pardon, though those who had “protested peacefully” should receive one. Former Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, who publicly criticized Trump after the attack but voted against convicting him, did not respond to a question from a reporter about the pardons.

But top Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chair of the Judiciary Committee, pivoted: “Everybody’s asking about Jan. 6, aren’t you going to ask me about the Biden pardons?”

Abortion politics took center stage at the Tuesday morning confirmation hearing for President Donald Trump’s pick to run the Department of Veterans Affairs.

VA Secretary nominee Doug Collins, a former Republican congressman from Georgia, was asked more than once by Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Democrats whether he would roll back a Biden administration rule allowing the agency to provide abortion counseling and, in some cases, the procedure itself.

The previous administration put that policy in place to protect reproductive health services in the VA following the 2022 Supreme Court decision striking down the constitutional right to an abortion.

Republicans have slammed the rule, however, saying it violates a 1992 law barring abortion care for military veterans or retirees through the VA healthcare system. The Trump administration is expected to overturn it, but Collins declined to take a definitive position.

“The law from 1992 says the VA does not do abortion,” Collins said in response to one question from Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) about whether a veteran who had been raped should be able to receive an abortion covered by the VA. “We will look at this rule and see if it complies with the law.”

Democrats also pressed Collins on the now-infamous Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025” policy blueprint for a GOP presidential administration, which warned the VA could be “target rich” for cost-cutting measures in the Trump administration. The document, among other things, endorsed policy changes that could result in reduced benefits for disabled veterans.

Collins sought to distance himself from the blueprint: “I have not been a part of Project 2025 and haven’t even read it,” he said in a response to a question from Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee ranking member Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) about the proposals.

“We’re not going to balance budgets on the back of veterans’ benefits,” Collins continued. “We’re going to put the veterans first.”

Collins is a staunch Trump supporter who served in Congress from 2013 to 2021. His military background is as an Air Force Reserve chaplain and Iraq War veteran — experience he touted during his confirmation hearing.

He was asked Tuesday by members of both parties about the agency’s significant budget shortfall and how that would factor into the federal government’s ability to provide necessary benefits to veterans, including those exposed to toxins while on the line of duty. Collins will also inherit a troubled electronic health record system initiated by the first Trump administration, which has been on pause since it was found to be tied to several veterans’ deaths and billions over budget.

Collins acknowledged the challenges ahead and pledged to expand choice for veterans to access care outside the VA.

“I do not come into this with rose-colored glasses. This is a large undertaking that I feel called to be at,” Collins said. “When a veteran has to call a congressman or senator’s office to get the care they have already earned, it’s a mark of failure.”