Tag

Slider

Browsing

Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, who rose to prominence testifying about the horrors of the Jan. 6 insurrection, is set to resign from the department, he confirmed to POLITICO.

Dunn testified in the Jan. 6 select committee’s first public hearing in July 2021 along with three other officers from the Capitol Police and D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department.

Dunn shared the racial epithets hurled at him by rioters as the officers recounted the violence they saw on Jan. 6. He and the other three officers — Michael Fanone of the MPD, Daniel Hodges of the MPD and Aquilino Gonell of USCP — went on to attend all of the Jan. 6 select panel’s public hearings.

Since then, Dunn has been outspoken about the lasting trauma he and other officers faced after Jan. 6 and his desire for accountability for those responsible for the Capitol insurrection. He also unsuccessfully ran to be the head of the Capitol Police’s union in Nov. 2021. He released a book this fall about his experiences and has expressed some interest in running for the congressional seat soon to be vacated by retiring Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.)

Roll Call earlier reported Dunn’s planned departure.

Members of Congress from Maryland and D.C. were caught off guard by the decision to move the Washington Capitals and Wizards to northern Virginia — and they’re concerned about the impact on a downtown Washington still reeling from the impacts of Covid.

Virginia leaders led by GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced the move, which took many in the area by surprise, during a Wednesday press conference in the Potomac Yard neighborhood where the new arena complex for the professional hockey and basketball teams will be located.

“They weren’t going to stay in Washington,” said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) in a brief interview. “So I guess we will have to see whether this new move will enhance them as they try to draw fans.”

Norton added she was concerned about the impact of the decision on the Gallery Place neighborhood, where both teams currently play.

It’s the latest in a series of local battles over regional institutions, with Maryland prevailing over Virginia last month in a bitter battle to secure the new headquarters of the FBI.

Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), whose district is poised to land the stadiums, said he’d “been hearing the rumors for weeks” of the relocation “so we knew it was coming if they could make a deal.”

“It’s gonna be a mixed blessing. On the one hand it’s a beautiful place to put it. … And it’ll be a great economic boon for both Arlington and Alexandria,” he said in an interview with POLITICO. “The downside, of course, is we don’t know how much it will change some of the precious neighborhoods — I say precious in the positive sense — Del Ray is special.”

Beyer, who acknowledged he’d not spoken with Mayor Muriel Bowser about the situation, said his impression was “keeping the [Washington] Commanders was a more important priority” for her, referring to the local football team currently playing in Maryland.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told POLITICO he was unaware of the negotiations and surprised by the announcement, saying he’d yet to speak with Mayor Muriel Bowser or Ted Leonsis, the owner of both teams.

“I worry about its impacts on the city,” Van Hollen said of the move.

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) declined to comment.

The House voted Wednesday to condemn antisemitism on college campuses and urge two elite university presidents to resign.

The nonbinding measure earned the two-thirds majority it needed for adoption, with the House voting 303-126 to approve.

Three Democrats voted “present” on the resolution: Chrissy Houlahan (Pa.) Julia Brownley (Calif.) and Jimmy Gomez (Calif.). Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) was the lone Republican voting against the measure.

Democrats were divided over the resolution, as they have been on multiple messaging measures about the Israel-Hamas war.

House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) led the effort, along with two Jewish Democrats, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Jared Moskowitz of Florida.

The move follows testimony last week from the presidents of Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Pennsylvania, during which each dodged questions about whether or not students calling for the genocide of Jews violated the schools codes of conduct or warranted punishment.

The resolution encourages Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth to resign. Penn President Elizabeth Magill resigned last week over her testimony. Harvard’s highest governing body said Tuesday that Gay would remain in her role.

“There is a reason why the testimony at the Education and Workforce Committee garnered 1 billion views worldwide,” Stefanik, a Harvard alum and the fourth-ranking GOP leader, said at a news conference. “And it’s because those university presidents made history by putting the most morally bankrupt testimony into the Congressional Record, and the world saw it.”

The resolution adopted Wednesday states that since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, “Jewish and Israeli students have faced physical violence, hate-filled disruptions in the classroom, calls from students and faculty advocating for the elimination and destruction of Israel, and other forms of persistent harassment.”

Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, also a Jewish Democrat, spoke against the resolution, calling the language about the two college presidents “a dramatic and unprecedented departure” from congressional history and “an academic scarlet letter and a professional death sentence.” He said previous resolutions adopted since the Oct. 7 attack on Israel condemning antisemitism and groups supporting Hamas on college campuses accomplished the primary goal.

House Republicans on Wednesday formally greenlit an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, their biggest step to date toward trying to remove the president from office.

Every Republican supported the 221-212 vote, which legally will further empower House GOP subpoenas. It comes at a critical juncture: The conference is preparing to make a decision as soon as January about whether or not to draft articles of impeachment.

It’s a win for Speaker Mike Johnson, who managed to unify his conference after battleground-district Republicans spent months resisting a formal inquiry — leading his predecessor to backtrack and start the investigation unilaterally.

“This is an important step. The impeachment power resides solely with the House of Representatives. If a majority of the House now says we’re in an official impeachment inquiry … that carries weight. That’s going to help us get these witnesses in,” Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said ahead of the vote.

Republicans are months into their impeachment probe, which has largely focused on the business deals of Joe Biden’s family members. While they’ve found evidence of Hunter Biden using his last name to bolster his own influence and poked holes in some previous statements by the White House and the president, they have yet to find direct evidence that the president’s official decisions were meant to benefit family businesses.

Even as Republicans inch toward making Biden the fourth president to ever be impeached, they are trying to draw a bright line between their vote on Wednesday and any eventual vote on impeachment articles.

Instead, GOP leaders have rallied their ranks behind the formal inquiry. That’s in part because of a letter the White House recently sent to congressional Republicans, citing a Trump-era Justice Department opinion to state that their requests are invalid without a formalization vote.

At the time, the Trump DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel was pushing back on then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) decision to launch an impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump without initially voting on it. Republicans blasted Pelosi’s strategy at the time.

“I was reluctant to do the inquiry because he was providing information. Now, if he’s going to stop providing the information, I think we have no choice but to do it.,” said Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.).

Republicans got unexpectedly complete unity on Wednesday as Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), a conservative who is retiring at the end of next year, supported a move that he had publicly criticized.

Buck has been one of the most vocal critics of his conference’s investigation, calling it “impeachment theater” and reiterating this week that he still does not believe his colleagues have found a direct link from Joe Biden to Hunter Biden’s business deals. Still, he voted yes.

He said after the vote that he still doesn’t see a link between Hunter Biden’s business activities and Joe Biden, but that he spoke with other members who stressed the vote was about investigating, not impeaching.

“I’m irritated that the White House sent that letter back. … I’m irritated that Hunter Biden comes to the Capitol and then doesn’t go in,” Buck said.

The vote to formalize the inquiry comes just hours after Hunter Biden skipped a closed-door deposition for which Republicans had subpoenaed him to appear. Instead, he spoke briefly with reporters outside of the Capitol, but did not take any questions — reiterating his offer to testify in public and slamming Republicans.

“Instead of doing anything to help make Americans’ lives better, they are focused on attacking me with lies,” Joe Biden said in a statement after the vote. “Instead of doing their job on the urgent work that needs to be done, they are choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt that even Republicans in Congress admit is not supported by facts.”

Now that Republicans have formalized their inquiry, investigators say they will try to compel Hunter Biden a second time to appear behind closed doors. They’re also vowing to hold him in contempt of Congress if he continues to resist the subpoena, as they prepare to get pulled into a court battle over their investigation.

Republicans are planning to sue to enforce their subpoenas against two DOJ tax officials, and they could also end up in court over their push to talk to a former White House counsel. In addition, the party is still waiting for documents it sought from the National Archives, which turned over new records just this week.

The White House has defended its compliance, noting in a recent memo that — between the administration, banks and private individuals — Republicans have received tens of thousands of financial documents and conducted dozens of hours of interviews.

Democrats are criticizing Republicans for moving forward to formalize their inquiry when some of their own members have acknowledged they haven’t yet met the bar for impeachment.

“A mountain of evidence and deluge of independent reporting, including from numerous conservative outlets, have discredited every single allegation leveled by Republicans against President Biden in their painstaking and fruitless inquiry,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), his party’s top member on the Oversight Committee.

Olivia Beavers contributed.

Sen. Michael Bennet has placed a hold on the National Defense Authorization Act, hoping to keep the Senate in town to finish entrenched border negotiations that would unlock Ukraine aid. And he’s looking into delaying more legislation if necessary, according to a person close to him.

The Colorado Democrat is concerned that Congress might soon leave without finishing its work to increase border security, discussions that are now tied directly to Ukraine aid. Without agreement from all 100 senators, the annual defense policy bill’s next vote would happen around midnight. Bennet is also considering holding up a Federal Aviation Administration extension, which needs to pass before the end of the year. He will not delay confirmation of nominees, the person said.

There’s new life in those border talks, as the White House and Senate leaders get more firmly engaged and bipartisan negotiators say they are continuing to move forward. But the House is preparing to leave town on Thursday until the new year, with little indication they’ll stick around to pass a supplemental spending bill that includes more cash for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan and the border.

Many Republicans say once the House leaves it will become impossible to pass a new foreign aid law this year. Still, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said “we should stay here until we reach an agreement or agree that we can’t.”

“My hope is that we stay,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), the top Democratic border negotiator. “We made progress yesterday and we continue to try to make progress today.”

Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.

SACRAMENTO — A Republican running to replace former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has sued to block McCarthy’s chosen heir from the ballot, plunging the race for the outgoing congress member’s seat into further uncertainty.

The lawsuit from far-right candidate David Giglio reflects a highly fluid situation in California’s 20th congressional district, where McCarthy’s decision to resign at the end of the year has launched a messy succession fight that reflects the Republican fractures that cost him the speakership.

Assembly member Vince Fong initially said he would not run for McCarthy’s seat and filed for re-election. But after Republican state Sen. Shannon Grove surprised observers by passing on a Congress bid, Fong reversed course and entered the House contest with McCarthy’s blessing.

That has pushed Fong into uncertain legal territory. The California secretary of state’s office said in a statement that “no withdrawal is allowed” and candidates cannot run for two seats at once but subsequently appeared to soften that stance, telling a reporter that the “unusual circumstances” merited closer review.

Giglio’s lawsuit similarly contends that Fong is barred from running for Congress. The candidate slammed McCarthy’s bid to elevate his successor in language that echoed conservative Republicans who pushed him out of the speakership.

Giglio, a Donald Trump-aligned conservative who was already challenging McCarthy from the right before his retirement, framed Fong’s run as an attempt by “McCarthy, spineless RINOs, and special interest groups” to “steal another deep red seat from President Trump and MAGA.”

“Former Speaker McCarthy and Mr. Fong’s misguided actions are yet another example of the corrupt Washington cartel acting outside the boundaries of the law,” Giglio said in a statement.

Representatives for Fong’s campaign and for the secretary of state’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Hunter Biden showed up on Capitol Hill on Wednesday but said he planned to testify in a public hearing, escalating a standoff with GOP investigators.

President Joe Biden’s son has insisted, through his attorney, that he wants to testify publicly and not in a private meeting. Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) has denied that request, demanding Hunter Biden sit for a closed-door deposition Wednesday.

“I’m here today to answer at a public hearing any legitimate questions Chairman Comer and the House Oversight Committee may have for me,” Hunter Biden told reporters.

“Republicans do not want an open process,” he added.

The two Republicans leading the investigation — Comer and Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) — have threatened to start contempt of Congress proceedings against Hunter Biden if he did not appear for the deposition.

With the House leaving town this week until January, that expected fight is likely to drag into next year. And Comer and Jordan need near unanimity among the House GOP to ultimately hold the younger Biden in contempt of Congress, though even if they clear that hurdle, there’s no guarantee the Justice Department would ultimately decide to prosecute him.

It was unclear even into Wednesday morning whether Hunter Biden would appear for the deposition. GOP investigators subpoenaed Hunter Biden in November for a closed-door meeting, but his attorney, Abbe Lowell, responded that the president’s son was willing to testify in a public hearing.

House Republicans countered that they would videotape the deposition and quickly release a transcript of the interview, in a failed bid to assuage Lowell’s concerns that Hunter Biden’s testimony would be selectively leaked or mischaracterized. Democrats have criticized Comer, in particular, for not releasing transcripts for several closed-door interviews and rejecting Hunter Biden’s offer to interview publicly.

“What the Republicans fear most is sunlight and the truth,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee.

In addition to Hunter Biden, GOP investigators have subpoenaed several individuals including James Biden, Joe Biden’s brother, and Rob Walker, a Hunter Biden business associate. Republicans have said lawyers for both are in talks with committee staff. They’ve also requested voluntary interviews with other family members.

But Republicans view Hunter Biden as a top target in their sweeping impeachment inquiry aimed at the president. The House is expected to vote as soon as Wednesday to formalize that inquiry, which was launched back in September.

Top Republicans believe only one GOP member will vote no on that: retiring Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.). They’ve managed to chip away at opposition from centrists and vulnerable Republicans in Biden-won districts.

Formalizing the inquiry is expected to give Republicans more legal power as they look to enforce their demands for documents and interviews. Though the White House has defended its level of cooperation with the investigation, officials have also pointed back to a Trump-era Justice Department opinion to argue that the inquiry, and subpoenas stemming from it, lack legitimacy without a formal vote to legitimize.

Republicans’ top potential legal targets include two Justice Department tax officials and a former White House counsel, each of whom they’ve requested interviews with. But Comer added that he believed the resolution could also help with their ongoing battle with Hunter Biden, noting that his counsel had previously “implied that this wasn’t a legitimate investigation.”

House Republicans are scheduled to vote Wednesday to formalize their impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. And behind closed doors, the Hill will wait and see if Hunter Biden appears at a deposition central to the House’s probe.

The impeachment inquiry vote is an attempt by House Republicans to give their probe stronger legal standing as they demand information from the White House and enforce subpoenas.

“We’re not making a political decision. It’s a legal decision,” Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Tuesday.

Earlier this year then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy was trying to have it both ways, announcing an impeachment probe to satisfy the conference’s right flank, but not holding a vote as Republicans in swing districts squirmed.

But many of those swing district Republicans, some in districts Biden won handily, are behind the effort now. And as of Tuesday evening, it appears Johnson will have the votes to make the Biden probe official.

Colorado’s Ken Buck is the only House Republican on the record opposing Wednesday’s vote to formalize the Biden probe and give the House more authority to seek documents and testimony.

As for Hunter’s deposition, it isn’t yet clear if he will show up. His lawyers have told the House Oversight Committee that he would cooperate, but that he also wanted to testify publicly. If he no-shows Wednesday, he is expected to face an effort to hold him in contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena.

Supplemental state of play: On Tuesday night, Senate leaders Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell met with negotiating senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), along with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and White House officials, including deputy chief of staff Natalie Quillian.

The meeting, which marked some of the most robust and visible involvement from the administration so far, followed comments from McConnell saying it would be “practically impossible” for Congress to pass legislation to boost aid to Ukraine and make significant border policy changes by the end of the year.

The meeting is unlikely to change the calculus on getting a deal by the end of this week when the House is set to leave for the year, but signals the eagerness by the White House to make progress and cut a deal.

Josh Hawley said in an interview he’s endorsing former President Donald Trump in the 2024 GOP primary, becoming the 18th Senate GOP backer of the former president.

The Missouri Repubican has already said he believed Trump’s renomination by the GOP was inevitable but had not made it official. Then, over the weekend, Trump said Hawley and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) should be “very careful” in their reelection races: “Stranger things have happened.”

“President Trump doesn’t need to worry. I’m with him. He’s asked me several times to support him. I said yes. And I’ve been saying for a year that I think he’s gonna be the nominee. I support him. I’m gonna vote for him,” Hawley said. “Don’t worry — you can put me down as support, endorsed, stand with.”