Tag

Slider

Browsing

Speaker Mike Johnson promoted legislation that would require proof of U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections in a press conference Wednesday, flanked by conservatives who have repeatedly questioned the results of the last presidential contest.

Johnson spoke alongside conservatives like Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), attorney Cleta Mitchell, Tea Party Patriots’ Jenny Beth Martin and former Donald Trump adviser Stephen Miller, many of whom pursued challenges to President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

“We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections,” Johnson said at the press conference. “But it’s not been something that is easily provable. We don’t have that number.”

The Louisiana Republican was flanked by figures like Mitchell, who helped assemble Trump’s crew of post-election lawyers and participated in a conference call where the former president pressured Georgia officials over the state’s election results. Martin was present at a march in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, but did not speak at a rally that day that preceded the Capitol attack.

“What we’re talking about today is the 2024 election — nobody can go back and relitigate what happened in 2020,” Johnson said, despite the histories of the people standing next to him.

It’s not the first signal that Johnson has been aligning himself more closely with Trump and his allies. The speaker and the former president have spoken multiple times in recent days as Johnson seeks to fend off threats from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to strip him of the House gavel, and Trump has told Greene to stand down from that effort.

The speaker vowed Tuesday that the House would pass the voter ID bill and send it over to the Senate for consideration, where it stands little chance of advancing. Despite that, Johnson pushed back on the idea the legislation was merely a messaging exercise, saying “we’ll let Chuck Schumer decide” whether to move on the bill.

Lee acknowledged that undocumented immigrants are currently barred from voting under federal law, but added: “There is no valid basis upon which you could oppose this. It would be insane.”

Kevin McCarthy is escalating his revenge campaign against Rep. Matt Gaetz.

In an interview with POLITICO, McCarthy backed Gaetz’s new Florida GOP primary challenger; a top McCarthy adviser also acknowledged playing a role in vetting that opponent, Aaron Dimmock. And McCarthy delivered a slashing attack on Gaetz, who led the effort to overthrow him as speaker last fall.

“Gaetz is the Hunter Biden of the Republican Party,” McCarthy said. “He’s got an opponent who is pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, trained at Pensacola, went to the Naval Academy and flew jets to defend us while Gaetz was getting kicked out of high school, buying coke and paying minors for sex.”

McCarthy was referring to the focus of an ongoing House Ethics Committee probe: allegations that Gaetz had sexual contact with minors. The committee is in possession of a sworn statement that alleges Gaetz was present at a party where illegal drugs were used, ABC reported. Gaetz has denied the drugs and sex-related allegations; he graduated from Niceville High School in Florida, according to his biography on the nonpartisan site Legistorm.

The Department of Justice conducted its own investigation as part of a sex trafficking probe and, according to Gaetz’s lawyers and DOJ officials, decided not to bring criminal charges.

Gaetz responded by inviting McCarthy to appear in the district with Dimmock, arguing it would be a boon for his campaign: “I whooped Kevin McCarthy in Washington. I don’t think he’s going to fare better when I’m playing home-field advantage in North Florida.”

Presented with McCarthy’s highly personal criticism, Gaetz also revived a nearly decade-old, unproven rumor that McCarthy had an affair with a colleague.

Gaetz is the highest-profile political target among the eight hardliners whom McCarthy and his allies are targeting in a vengeance tour that was first reported by POLITICO. But he is also among the hardest of McCarthy’s foes to unseat.

And even if Gaetz — who’s won past primary challenges by healthy margins — defeats Dimmock, McCarthy may have another opportunity to exact revenge. Florida Republicans suspect he is eyeing the seat that Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) will be forced to give up in 2026, though Gaetz has said he doesn’t plan to run.

It’s the recipe for a perpetual clash. Even lobbyist and McCarthy ally Jeff Miller took his shot last week, accusing Gaetz of invoking antisemitic tropes to explain his vote against a GOP antisemitism bill and slamming the Florida firebrand as a “pedophile.”

The McCarthy-Gaetz vitriol is spiking anew just as Speaker Mike Johnson appears closer than ever to neutralizing his own ouster threat from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), whose combative instincts McCarthy had worked to tame as he turned her into an ally. While Greene chafes at Johnson, Gaetz has stayed conspicuously on the sidelines and — though he occasionally criticizes the speaker’s decisions — made clear he’s not in favor of an election-year effort to topple a second House GOP leader.

The players are bringing different personalities to the clash this time, but it’s also clear that no party rivalry can measure up to McCarthy-Gaetz in terms of intensity and longevity. Their feud, many House Republicans argue, was personal from the start. Gaetz’s critics contend that he is responsible for the tension that has continued to grip the House GOP conference after McCarthy’s ouster, including the fallout from Johnson’s decisions since taking the gavel last year.

“I think it would be expected that Kevin would want to respond to what happened,” said ally Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) of the ongoing animosity, while noting that both he and Gaetz are well-respected in their districts. “So it’s not surprising.”

Some of McCarthy’s loyalists see an opportunity for payback in the Ethics Committee’s ultimate findings about Gaetz. A few McCarthy allies have even privately suggested using the internal inquiry’s findings to try to oust Gaetz from Congress, if the conclusions are damaging enough.

Yet such premature speculation has also given Gaetz further fodder to claim that the ethics probe was retribution rather than a fairly handled investigation.

Indeed, Gaetz’s allies aren’t shocked either that tempers remain hot between the two men. Another of the eight Republicans who supported the McCarthy ouster, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), predicted that the former speaker is “bitter and will continue on that path” of going after the Floridian for the rest of his political career.

McCarthy allies are expected to get involved in multiple primaries where his foes could prove electorally vulnerable. Earlier this year, they had homed in on Reps. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and Bob Good (R-Va.), both of whom voted to oust McCarthy — and other hardliners who backed Gaetz were preparing to face their own challengers.

“Well, I hope [McCarthy] spends a lot of money there,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), another of the so-called Gaetz Eight who opposed the former speaker. “Because Matt will still win, and it’ll divert some of this money away from other people.”

But McCarthy allies predicted that Dimmock’s challenge might fare better than many expect. Brian O. Walsh, a top McCarthy ally who is overseeing efforts to take on members of the infamous “Gaetz Eight,” told POLITICO that he traveled to “Florida’s Panhandle in March to conduct focus groups and left pleased with the findings.“

Some Republicans, however, indicated that the ongoing fight generally isn’t helpful to the party.

“The Kevin-Matt thing is a Kevin-Matt thing, and it’s unfortunate. But these things are going to play out, and we’re going to move on,“ said Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), who said “no,“ he doesn’t think Dimmock has any chance to beat Gaetz.

Dimmock was a last-minute entrant into the Florida primary, formalizing his bid the night before the filing deadline. One early sign that McCarthy was involved: His campaign committee has the same treasurer as American Patriots PAC, a group tied to McCarthy during the last election cycle.

With more than three months until the Aug. 20 primary, Gaetz is already taking aim at Dimmock’s record.

A campaign committee tied to Gaetz, called Friends of Matt Gaetz, has sought to preempt Dimmock by purchasing a URL for his campaign, painting him as “woke” and including a link for donations to the incumbent. That attack leans on social media posts from 2020 where Dimmock voiced support for diversity and the Black Lives Matter movement following the murder of George Floyd, a Black man, by a white Minneapolis police officer.

Gaetz argued that McCarthy recruited a “D.E.I enthusiast, Black Lives Matter supporter to run against me.”

A Dimmock campaign spokesperson pushed back hard at Gaetz.

“Matt Gaetz’s desperation oozes out of every baseless claim he makes as he attempts to distract voters from his disastrous tenure in Congress. The voters of this district are going to have a clear choice in August: a true conservative outsider with a history of service to country or a desperate career politician who will say anything to hold on to power.”

Senators continue to look for a way forward on amendments to FAA reauthorization legislation ahead of a Friday deadline.

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer cited “good progress” on the floor Tuesday but also noted it will take “a lot of cooperation to get this complicated bill done” quickly.

Both parties will break for their weekly lunches around midday, and the aviation legislation is sure to be a key topic of conversation.

Across the Capitol, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has seemingly relented — for now — from her threat to force an ouster vote on Speaker Mike Johnson. The speaker, for his part, has said he’s not negotiating with the conservative firebrand.

The chamber is expected to vote around 4:30 p.m. Among the measures slated for consideration is a bill requiring non-citizens be excluded from the Census — a policy the Trump administration tried to implement but abandoned after the Supreme Court struck the effort down.

At 1 p.m., the House Oversight Committee will hold a hearing on Washington’s response to antisemitism. Mayor Muriel Bowser is expected to testify.

Mike Johnson is the speaker of the House today for one main reason: Predecessor Kevin McCarthy simply could not master the job.

In recent weeks, and with increasing confidence in the past few days, the new speaker has passed an early test: He’s demonstrated that Mike Johnson is no Kevin McCarthy.

He is not someone who GOP politicians can torment with impunity. He has aligned himself with former President Donald Trump — indispensable for a Republican in his position — while not being treated like a golden retriever, as Trump did with “my Kevin.” He is disliked by Democrats, naturally, but not generally held in abject contempt.

He, in short, is not a Washington joke — or at least not as much of one as seemed possible when he took the speaker’s gavel almost by accident, the political equivalent of Forrest Gump.

“The reality is, in the last month-plus … he’s been able to get the job done despite all of the efforts to undermine him,” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said. “He’s doing an effective job as speaker and building consensus both within the conference and navigating a divided government.”

One reason Johnson is passing his early leadership test is that it’s being graded on a curve. The speaker is hassled by the same unruly forces that harried McCarthy for nine months in 2023 before hounding him out of office in October. Few people will be surprised if, in due course, Johnson’s antlers also hang on the wall of the right-wing rec room.

At a minimum, however, Johnson has fortified his reputation in consequential ways. Substantively, Johnson is an authentic movement conservative in a way that McCarthy never was, while pushing much the same agenda and seeking the same sort of compromises: deals on federal spending, foreign assistance and surveillance — all of which provoke the right.

But Johnson has been successful in isolating his critics in a way McCarthy never could. He brushed off threats to oust him from the speakership and casually dismissed one of the loudest voices, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), as an unserious lawmaker. He appears to have convinced Greene to retreat from her threats to force a vote on Johnson’s speakership (for now, at least) without allowing any real concessions. Their talks, he told reporters, were “not a negotiation,” with her requests to be “processed” in due course.

And on Tuesday, Johnson made plain he expects to continue leading Republicans after the November election — which runs counter to most predictions heard in GOP circles.

“I intend to lead this conference in the future and the most important thing we have to do right now is govern the country well, show the American people that we are and that’s what we have been doing,” he told reporters.

Slow but skillful

To be sure, Johnson’s recent swagger can — and probably should — be attributed mostly to the grace of Trump. The former president personally stuck his neck out to quell the recent uprising, forcing Greene to think twice about moving against the speaker in an election year — not to mention crossing the king of MAGA himself.

Trump’s intervention may have less to do with affection for Johnson than with concern about the political backlash against what would be a new round of Republican chaos on the hill. Even still, it represents a stark contrast with Trump’s decision to stand pat last fall as McCarthy faced his assassins.

“I think when your presidential nominee … is on your side against chaos, I think that obviously strengthens your hand,” Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) said.

But Johnson has also proved deft in recent months at handling his members. And while he has hardly achieved the formidable reputation of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi — who kept Democrats mostly unified in a way House Republicans haven’t been for decades — several episodes have shown him to be nimble in situations with scant room for maneuver.

Early on, Johnson showed a willingness to listen to his most conservative members. They were wary of being jammed with yet another massive omnibus spending bill, so he embraced a two-step approach hatched by Freedom Caucus Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) that Democrats and many GOP appropriators initially found silly. But he stuck with the idea and started building trust on the right.

More recently, by converting a portion of U.S. aid to Ukraine into a “loan,” he was able to frame passage of foreign assistance — a major ask from President Joe Biden and Democrats — as a win for Trump. That was an audacious spin, and Trump bought it.

And when Johnson was most vulnerable last month — just when Greene’s threat to his gavel was gaining traction — he locked arms with Trump, a lesson he clearly learned from his predecessor. He visited Mar-a-Lago for a news conference on “election integrity,” a huge priority for Trump, and was rewarded with an unofficial endorsement and timely photo op with the ex-president.

But Johnson also hasn’t bowed to Trump’s every whim the way McCarthy regularly did. When the ex-president insisted that GOP lawmakers kill an extension of foreign surveillance authorities, for example, Johnson bulled forward — personally providing the deciding vote on a key amendment — and got the legislation to Biden’s desk.

That’s not to say conservatives are happy with Johnson. Many on the House GOP’s rightmost flank clearly are not. “Everybody expected him to be a true conservative and to fight,” said Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.). “He has just not made the decisions we thought he would make.”

Yet in the same breath, Norman noted approvingly that Johnson has shown “he’s not scared of” Greene’s threats and applauded his willingness to listen.

An honest broker

Most frequently, though, members praise Johnson as someone who keeps his word. To put it mildly, that was never a McCarthy signature.

Johnson told GOP defense hawks privately months ago he’d get Ukraine aid passed. They trusted him and he delivered at a time when most well-informed reporters and senior Republicans doubted it could ever pass the House.

The strange new respect has crept across the aisle, as well. Where McCarthy enraged Democrats by reneging on a spending deal with Biden after a right-wing backlash, Johnson has operated in good faith, those who have negotiated against him say, laying out specifically what he needs to deliver passage of critical legislation and avoiding confrontational policy demands pushed by his right flank.

They also appreciate that Johnson has stayed respectful of the opposition. Sure, Johnson is still blasting the administration on their handling of college protests and the “weaponization” of the DOJ. But unlike McCarthy, he’s not making deals with them one day and then attacking them personally on TV a few hours later.

Conversely, Johnson has avoided making promises he can’t keep — another habit that helped precipitate McCarthy’s downfall. The fallen speaker was notorious for telling people what they wanted to hear — whether it was vowing to Trump that he’d expunge his impeachment record and not following through, or promising conservative rabble-rousers more power only to change their agreement after they backed him as speaker.

Johnson also takes meetings with hard-liners and mulls over their ideas — too much, some senior Republicans think. But he’s also delivered tough talk to his members in a way that McCarthy never did.

Case in point: In a recent GOP conference meeting, Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) needled Johnson about how Republicans were supposed to explain to constituents that they’re not addressing the border crisis while voting to send billions of dollars to other countries. Johnson shot back with a reality check: I fought like hell for border security, he told her, but until Trump is president again, no true border fix is possible.

“I’m frustrated with some of the votes, but I realize … he hasn’t lied to us,” said Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), one of the eight GOP hard-liners who voted to oust McCarthy. “His prior votes were a lot different, but when you’re in leadership, I understand [it’s] a different scenario.”

Anthony Adragna, Olivia Beavers and Jordain Carney contributed to this report.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is seemingly retreating from her threat to hold a referendum on Mike Johnson’s speakership this week after two meetings with the GOP leader.

The Georgia firebrand is backing away from her pledge to hold an ouster vote, for now, saying the small band of conservative rebels interested in booting him would continue to watch Johnson’s actions moving forward. The speaker was widely expected to survive any attempted firing this week, as Democrats had committed to helping him.

“We will see. … Right now the ball is in Mike Johnson’s court,” she responded, when reporters repeatedly pressed her on whether she would carry out her promise to force the vote.

It is a dizzying walkback of a threat Greene first made more than six weeks ago. She had vowed to act on her vow to force an anti-Johnson vote this week even as it became clear that she didn’t have the support to fire him – with former President Donald Trump standing by him and Democratic leaders announcing they would align against her.

During an impromptu briefing on the Capitol steps with her chief ally Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Greene offered no end date for the duo to decide when to try to force a vote on ending Johnson’s reign and said only that his runway is “pretty short.” Greene cautioned that her new stance didn’t “necessarily” mean she had ruled out making a move this week, while Massie attempted to add an even more urgent condition.

“We actually have to see progress hourly” from the speaker, he said, though neither Greene nor Massie provided few specifics on what that would look like.

Despite making several key requests of Johnson in their two lengthy meetings this week, Greene and Massie walked away without a clear commitment from him — and instead urged reporters to go talk to the GOP leader.

Asked whether it is fair to dangle the threat of a no-confidence vote over his head with no timeline or specified legislation in mind, Greene replied that their leaked list of four items was “pretty specific” and that Johnson must now decide how to make good on their demands.

Those four requests from Greene and her allies: defunding Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump; no more Ukraine aid, a deal on federal spending; and ensuring future bills brought to the floor boast support from the majority of the House Republicans.

But some of their ideas are already sparking pushback in other corners of the conference, where members are warning Johnson to avoid getting backed into a corner like his predecessor, fired former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Johnson has publicly downplayed that he is negotiating with his critics — instead describing their closed-door meetings as “productive” discussion but largely the same sort of listening session that he would hold with any member of his conference. When asked, he has declined to share details of those meetings to his House colleagues and reporters.

“I hear suggestions and ideas and thoughts from members. My door has been open from day one,” Johnson said on Tuesday.

Donald Trump is going further than just public statements supporting Speaker Mike Johnson — he’s actually trying to mediate between the House GOP leader and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

So far, it’s unclear if the ex-president can convince one of his most loyal followers to back off her threat to force a vote ousting the speaker.

Trump and the Georgia firebrand, who speak often, had a lengthy phone call over the weekend, according to three Republicans familiar with the matter. Trump’s message to her, per those people: Stand down from the so-called motion to vacate.

“I have it under very, very good sources that President Trump did engage. And I’m hoping that perhaps one would come to the conclusion: ‘You made your point,’” said Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.), citing a weekend discussion the former president had with Greene. “But don’t be Kamikaze, because if you go for this, you’re gonna get beaten down. And he made that point. I’m hoping that’s the outcome.”

Another Republican, granted anonymity to discuss private conversations, put it more bluntly: “He told her not to do it.”

Such messages fall in line with Trump’s public remarks, where he’s repeatedly praised the GOP leader and urged Greene not to trigger the vote. He’s made those same comments at private events, according to one Republican with knowledge of his remarks.

“The President was very strong in his endorsement of Johnson at the RNC event this weekend. He repeatedly said what a good job Johnson is doing under impossible circumstances,” said this Republican in attendance, granted anonymity to speak candidly. “And the president repeatedly said that we Republicans need to be unified heading into November.”

The Trump call preceded Greene meeting with Johnson on Monday afternoon, which lasted roughly two hours as they discussed a way forward. They were joined by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who was the second House Republican to co-sponsor the ejection threat.

Johnson and Greene are scheduled to meet again on Tuesday afternoon in what could be an offramp from Greene’s ouster vote threat. The two are discussing multiple ideas, including trying to defund special counsel Jack Smith — a proposal that is likely to spark pushback from other corners of the GOP conference, as it could risk a shutdown shortly before the November election — as well as deals on spending. But Johnson stressed on Tuesday that “it’s not a negotiation” and that he was just listening to ideas from Greene and Massie.

Trump’s backchanneling has extended to Johnson, as well. The speaker said that he also spoke with Trump on Monday — and that the former president had his back on Greene’s threats.

“He’s not in favor of it,” Johnson told reporters, adding that Trump did not call into his Monday meeting with Greene and Massie.

Despite Trump’s pushback, Greene has defended her decision to press forward with a referendum on his speakership, arguing that she — and not Johnson — is the GOP member actually fighting for policies that Trump supports. She’s also acknowledged that she’s spoken with Trump on the vacate effort, while declining to detail their conversations.

“I fight harder for President Trump in Washington, D.C., than anybody,” Greene said in an interview Tuesday with Steve Bannon. “But everybody is trying to pretend like there’s a problem between us. And I’m going to tell you right now: There is not.”

But even some of Johnson’s critics have acknowledged that Trump’s backing has added an extra layer of protection for the speaker and, at least for now, helped deflate Greene’s ouster threat. Other Republicans have privately warned that Greene is risking political blowback, testing the boundaries of a GOP presidential nominee who doesn’t typically take kindly to defiance.

Trump allies who oppose her effort, however, also argue Trump so far doesn’t see this as rising to the level of disloyalty.

As Johnson heads into a second meeting with Greene and Massie Tuesday, Republicans are gently warning the speaker against boxing himself in with his hardliners. They argue the clearest warning is his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy, who agreed to multiple huge concessions back in January 2023 in order to win the House gavel.

“I don’t have a problem with him listening. What I will have a problem with … is when you start making special deals, side deals, hidden deals, behind the closed-door deals. And then not just conservatives but moderates, say: ‘Well, what about my deal,’” said Republican Study Committee Chair Kevin Hern (R-Okla.).

“That’s how we got in trouble in January 2023,” echoed centrist Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.). “We gave away way too much, and I think we’re paying for it right now. So I would be very careful on negotiating with her.”

Johnson acknowledged during a closed-door conference meeting on Tuesday morning that he was meeting with Greene and Massie. But Johnson said he told members that he was only hearing them out — something he frequently does for Republicans who wanted to speak with him, regardless of their ideology.

“It’s not a negotiation,” he said. “Everybody knows I have lengthy discussions, detailed discussions with members across the conference.”

Anthony Adragna contributed to this report.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, the first Palestinian American woman to serve in Congress, is demanding the International Criminal Court issue an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

She made the demand in a statement Tuesday, as Democrats are grappling with deep intra-party divisions over the state of the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas and the IDF began carrying out military operations in Rafah, a major city in Gaza.

Meanwhile, House Republicans are reiterating their plans to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) over comments that some Jewish students were “pro-genocide,” which she made during an appearance at Columbia University — the site of ongoing contentious protests that have at times veered into antisemitic rhetoric.

“There is nowhere safe in Gaza,” Tlaib said in a statement. “I urge the ICC to swiftly issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and senior Israeli officials to finally hold them accountable for this genocide.”

Tlaib has previously declined to urge supporters to back President Joe Biden for reelection in November, citing his handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict. Republicans, who have tended to widely side with Israel after the attacks on Oct. 7, have frequently criticized Tlaib and other progressives for siding with Hamas.

To that end, House Republicans are prepared to formally pursue another censure of Omar over her recent comments at Columbia that “we should not have to tolerate antisemitism or bigotry for all Jewish students — whether they are pro-genocide or anti-genocide.”

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) reiterated Tuesday he’d pursue censure, though he added he would not make his resolution privileged — which would force a quick vote.

“It’s just unacceptable, so I want to take a bold stand,” he told reporters on Tuesday. “I don’t like me forcing stuff on the agenda when [Speaker Mike Johnson] has got so many other things.”

He predicted that many Democrats would support his resolution, indicating many told him privately they would.

Omar’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment

Jordain Carney and Nicholas Wu contributed to this report.

After a two-hour-long meeting Monday with the speaker, Marjorie Taylor Greene — and Capitol Hill writ large — could get a much better sense Tuesday of the future of her efforts to oust Mike Johnson from the House’s top spot.

Greene (R-Ga.), along with ally Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), met with Johnson in his office, but left without much in terms of steps forward. The trio are set to meet again at 12:30 p.m. Tuesday.

Greene is staying mum on what demands she’s making of Johnson, but our colleague Rachael Bade broke them down. The Georgia Republican is looking for promises of no more aid to Ukraine, stripping funding for DOJ probes into former President Donald Trump and automatic spending cuts if appropriations agreements aren’t wrapped up on time.

There’s another ask at the core of her conflict with Johnson: the “Hastert Rule.” Named after now-disgraced former Speaker Dennis Hastert, it’s a pledge to not bring any legislation to the floor that doesn’t have the support from the majority of the GOP conference.

Johnson has allowed spending bills and foreign aid packages to clear the House without the backing of the majority of his conference, instead leaning on Democrats to the consternation of those in the GOP’s right flank.

These meetings between Johnson and Greene don’t mean she won’t move to vacate this week; she still reserves that right. But with Democrats pledging backup for Johnson and a hearty bloc of GOP support for the speaker, the votes do not appear to add up.

Before the midday meeting in Johnson’s office over his potential ouster, the entire House GOP Conference is set to gather for their weekly meeting first thing this morning.

Senate returns to FAA: The Senate is back Tuesday with just four days before Friday’s deadline to reauthorize the FAA. At this point, a short-term patch is looking more likely. Senators have filed nearly 100 amendments to the bill, and the chance for a deal on amendments and speeding up action on the legislation is waning.

Expect broad frustration if few or no amendments are taken up. This is one of the last major pieces of legislation expected this year, and nearly every lawmaker had something they were hoping could hitch a ride on the must-pass bill.

A bipartisan group of 85 House and Senate members is lining up against the Biden administration’s push to shift space-focused Air National Guardsmen into the Space Force.

The lawmakers urged leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services committees in a letter Monday to reject the Pentagon push when their panels consider annual defense policy legislation in the coming weeks.

The group argued the move undercuts state governors’ authority and the Guard’s dual national security and state domestic response missions. They said it also “undermines the choice made” by Guard members to serve part-time in their states.

“To be clear: when individuals sign up for the National Guard, they are serving their country and their community,” the lawmakers wrote. “Congress shouldn’t abandon this model.”

The letter was spearheaded by Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), and Colorado Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper. It’s the largest show of force so far by lawmakers opposed to the Pentagon’s space legislative proposal ahead of debate on the annual National Defense Authorization Act.

Opposition to the space personnel moves, led by fellow Democrats, is yet another complication for President Joe Biden, who is seeking to smooth over divisions in his party headed into an election.

The bicameral, bipartisan Hill resistance comes as all 50 governors came out against the Air Force plan this past week. Opposition from governor’s mansions puts pressure on congressional delegations to act to kill the proposal.

Governors from 48 states and five U.S. territories penned a bipartisan letter opposing the plan last week. The two governors who didn’t sign on, Republicans Ron DeSantis of Florida and Greg Abbott of Texas, have since sent their own letters opposing the administration’s aims.

The Pentagon in March sent lawmakers a legislative proposal that would permit the Air Force to transfer space units from the Air National Guard to the Space Force.

Though meant to bring those part-time personnel into the new space service, the plan has drawn broad opposition from space and non-space states alike that are concerned about protecting their Guard assets. Governors argue doing so would undermine their authority to command their Guard forces.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, meanwhile, has downplayed the implications of the proposal, arguing it was meant to allow the 5-year-old Space Force to flexibly manage its full- and part-time personnel without incurring extra cost or creating new bureaucracy.

While lawmakers such as Crow are pushing to create a separate Space National Guard to house those weekend warriors, the letter didn’t offer a specific alternative to the Space Force shift. They’re only urging the four Armed Services leaders to keep the proposal out of the NDAA.

“We recognize the Air Force is evolving to address future threats, but there are other options available to the Air Force to accomplish this evolution that don’t undo an important foundation of our state National Guard system established by Congress,” they said.

Rep. Henry Cuellar’s indictment marks the third high-profile Hispanic lawmaker to have been indicted in recent months. Critically, the influential Congressional Hispanic Caucus is coming to his defense.

That’s a marked difference from how the group treated Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), a fellow member who was indicted on charges that he and his wife accepted bribes in forms of cash, a car and gold bars to help aid the Egyptian government. Generally, the CHC has stayed far away from Menendez’s issues, but they’re explicitly defending Cuellar — who’s also accused of accepting bribes to help a foreign government.

It’s a small but significant silver lining for the freshly charged Texan.

“Congressman Cuellar has been a steadfast advocate for his constituents in South Texas and an important voice in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus,” Hispanic Caucus spokesperson Brian Garcia told us in a statement. “The Congressman has stated that he is innocent of the allegations in the indictment and that he was proactive in seeking Ethics Committee guidance. He deserves his day in court to respond.”

Garcia didn’t detail why they would officially defend Cuellar and not Menendez. But Cuellar’s lawyer, Chris Flood, had his own take for why the two cases are different: it’s “in the details.”

“I don’t know what the details are in the Menendez case, but there is no quid pro quo in the Cuellar case,” Flood told us in a brief interview.

Why does the CHC’s position matter? Consider the case of our third recently indicted lawmaker, former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), whose colorful transgressions had played out over months before he was booted from the House in December. He had far fewer Hill allies to count on and was already radioactive to much of the House GOP conference when his expulsion vote came up. Even if he had somehow survived, the chances of him getting reelected were slim to none.

While Cuellar was already automatically booted from leading an appropriations subpanel, due to House Democrats’ rules on indicted members, the CHC statement shows he can still count on high-profile allies. That gives him a shot at staying in the House — though his reelection is in serious peril.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to tri-caucus watchers that they’d hold their fire on a longtime respected incumbent. The influential blocs of Hispanic, Black and Asian American lawmakers generally defer to seniority, and top Hispanic lawmakers are also backing the reelection bid of Rep. Rob Menendez (D-N.J.), Bob Menendez’s son, who’s facing a competitive primary. (There’s no indication Rob Menendez is part of the elder Menendez’s corruption scandal).

Cuellar and his wife Imelda can’t leave the Southern or Western Texas Court Districts under the conditions of release, though he can travel to Washington, D.C., for congressional purposes. International travel requires court permission, and they had their firearms confiscated, too. The trial is scheduled to start in July.

Here’s where it gets tricky for Democrats. New York Republicans led the charge on expelling Santos, arguing to leadership that keeping him in the House could drag down their own reelection chances. Democrats don’t seem to have the same fears related to Cuellar, yet, but they have to ensure his case doesn’t broadly stain other members of the party with the corruption label. Republicans and even some members of their own party could make that difficult.

“Dems should vote to expel him, just as they should expel Menendez,” Ezra Levin, cofounder of progressive group Indivisible, posted on X. “Failure to do that weakens the Dem brand, encourages disaffected voters to believe both sides are corrupt, and risks handing votes to Trump & MAGA.”

Santos, never one to pass up a shot in the spotlight, is calling for Cuellar to be expelled. Only one sitting House Democrat has called for Cuellar to go: Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), an iconoclast in the party best known these days for trying to challenge President Joe Biden for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination.