Tag

Slider

Browsing

Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe angrily suggested at a Senate hearing Tuesday that local law enforcement was primarily to blame for a shooter getting access to a building where he attempted to assassinate Donald Trump.

“We were told that building was going to be covered. There had been a face-to-face that afternoon. … Our team leads met,” Rowe said at a joint Senate committee hearing. He added he had personally laid on the roof to assess what the shooter could have seen. “I cannot understand why there was not better coverage or at least somebody looking at that roofline when that’s where they were posted.”

“Why was the assailant not seen?” Rowe added, displaying photos of the roof, which were taken from where police should have been posted and from the position of the countersniper who eventually shot the shooter.

Rowe seemed to be walking a tightrope between blaming local law enforcement for abandoning the post while also trying not to alienate state and local police that are essential to securing events.

“Our state and local law enforcement partners are the best. So, this this belief that somehow they are less than federal law enforcement or they’re less than the Secret Service — they’re out there patrolling communities every day,” Rowe said. “We need them and we need them to be partners with us. And I think we need to be very clear to them and that may have contributed to this situation.”

Later though, Rowe was more blunt: “We assumed the state and locals had it.”

The acting secret service director also referred to a series of technical and communications shortcomings that may have impacted security on the day of the shooting. That included officials relying on text messages to communicate the threat Crooks posed rather than using a radio channel, as well as difficulty with cellular service at the site.

Rowe acknowledged that the agency’s radio communications from the rally on the day of the shooting were not recorded, and he revealed Tuesday that he had ordered the Secret Service to begin retaining those recordings in the future.

“We will have them moving forward,” Rowe said.

Senior officials from the Secret Service and FBI head to Capitol Hill on Tuesday for a rare joint hearing examining the security lapses leading up to the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.

Ronald Rowe Jr., acting director of the Secret Service, and Paul Abbate, deputy director of the FBI, will appear before the Judiciary and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees beginning at 10 a.m.

Up to 32 different senators will have the chance to ask questions between the two panels. Four senators — Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Laphonza Butler (D-Calif.) — are members of both committees.

“The basic question is, how did he get the gun on the premises?” Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said to reporters Monday, adding he’d also like to know what security changes will be implemented ahead of the August DNC in Chicago.

He noted: “There are half a dozen kids like [the shooter] in every high school in America. This kid didn’t appear — the 20-year-old — did not appear to have a specific political agenda. He had a gun. He used it. Sadly, a person died.”

The leaders of the Homeland Security panel made a sweeping request for records related to the attempted assassination as part of the committee’s bipartisan investigation last week.

Expect plenty of questions about FBI Director Christoper Wray’s remark last week that there was “some question” as to whether a bullet or shrapnel caused the injury to Trump’s ear during the attack. The agency later clarified it was indeed a bullet that hurt the former president.

An FBI official said Monday that Trump agreed to sit for an interview about the incident.

Rowe and Abbate will hope to improve on the performance of then-Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, who infuriated members from both parties during House testimony by offering vague answers about the assassination attempt. She later resigned following the Hill appearance.

Rep. Bill Pascrell remains hospitalized but is no longer receiving breathing assistance, according to his office.

“Congressman Pascrell has been breathing on his own since last week and continues to improve every day,” Pascrell Chief of Staff Ben Rich said in a statement. “His doctors are very encouraged by his progress, have begun to discuss discharge plans, and continue to anticipate a full recovery.”

Background: The 87-year-old Democrat checked into St. Joseph’s University Medical Center in Paterson on July 14 with a fever. While Pascrell’s staff initially said he was in “good spirits” and had told staff he was “actively looking for a beer,” his condition took a turn last week. Rich in a statement Thursday said that while recovering from a respiratory infection, the congressmember suffered a “setback” and was given “breathing assistance.”

Pascrell is the oldest member of New Jersey’s congressional delegation and if reelected will become the oldest member of the House following the retirement of California Rep. Grace Napolitano. Pascrell was also hospitalized in 2020 for heart bypass surgery.

Pascrell in June easily defeated a primary challenge from Prospect Park Mayor Mohamed Khairullah based largely on disenchantment with his stance on Gaza. He faces Republican Billy Prempeh for a third time in November.

What’s next: Rich’s statement indicated that Pascrell has no plans to drop his reelection bid.

“The congressman is relieved that this illness only led to him missing a few voting days,” Rich said. “And after winning a decisive primary victory, Congressman Pascrell is excited to finish the job alongside Kamala Harris in November in defense of American democracy and New Jersey values.”

Pascrell’s illness comes three months after 10th District Rep. Donald Payne died of a heart attack following a lengthy hospitalization.

Senate Republicans are publicly sticking by JD Vance after his tough week, but they have some advice for their first-term colleague: Choose your words more carefully.

Democrats have excoriated Vance over his remarks in a 2021 interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson. The Ohio Republican said the Democratic Party was being run by “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”

He specifically listed likely Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris as an example of a politician without children, as he tried to paint the party as anti-family.

“It was an inappropriate comment,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said of Vance’s remarks. Still, the senator insisted his colleague is a “very smart guy” and that “his intelligence and his wit probably just got the better of him.”

Other Republicans made clear they thought the comments were a mistake. Still, they’re brushing past it, publicly sticking with Donald Trump’s selected running mate despite behind-the-scenes doubts about Vance within the party. It’s a sign that Republicans are still closely aligned behind Trump and, at the very least, want to project unity as they grapple with the campaign pivot to Harris.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said it was “not a great choice of words” but that the campaign should stay on offense. Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) warned that while Democrats likely won’t have new material to use to define Trump, but “JD, he’s new on the scene, you’ve got to be careful.” He added that while the current backlash wouldn’t “rule the day,” saying Vance was being taken too literally, it would be “painful” to get through in the short term.

“I think he just needs to be incredibly circumspect as to what he says, with the understanding that it will be filtered in the way most negative,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) echoed: “With increased scrutiny, people are going to ask about previous statements” but that “obviously, this is a huge distraction away from the problems Kamala Harris has.”

Other Republicans largely responded to questions about Vance’s comments with a collective shrug — arguing that the vice presidential pick is ultimately up to Trump and that there are no signs that the GOP nominee is prepared to walk back his choice. Vance himself has said that his comments are being taken out of context, and that he was trying to sarcastically make a larger point about Democratic policies.

“The president makes the nomination,” Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said. “I think there are always going to be people who are naysayers or people that are second guessing. That’s part of the process.” When he was pressed on what voting bloc Vance adds to the presidential ticket, he sidestepped, saying the former president wanted a “teammate.”

The widespread GOP defense of Vance is a flip from just a few months ago, when some senators openly questioned why Trump would pick the MAGA-favored Ohioan. Instead, they said Trump should pick someone who appealed more to the center.

Other vice presidential candidates like Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) or North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum (R) best fit that order. Some suggested considering former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, who ran a long primary bid against the former president.

Those calls quieted as it became more obvious that Trump was favoring Vance. Now, GOP senators insist that Trump made the right choice.

“I think [Vance] appeals geographically and demographically to blocks of voters that obviously we want to have in our coalition,” said Senate Minority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.).

The Biden administration said Monday it has serious concerns with the Venezuelan election but stopped short of declaring the narrow victory of President Nicolas Maduro fraudulent or calling for additional sanctions against the South American country.

U.S. officials said they were awaiting more detailed results from Sunday’s voting in which unified opposition supporters turned out in large numbers and appeared to have won according to unofficial exit polls.

The statement of “serious concerns”— issued by Secretary of State Antony Blinken — was followed by National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson saying on X that the U.S. will wait until the government issues “full, detailed results for transparency” before saying whether the election was rigged or not.

Nine countries in the region including Argentina, Guatemala, Peru and Uruguay are calling for a complete recount of election results that the National Electoral Council, which is loyal to Maduro, says show the president narrowly defeating opposition candidate Edmundo González.

The reluctance to quickly join other countries in the region in condemning the election comes at a delicate moment, with the opposition insisting it mounted a successful challenge to a government that has turned increasingly authoritarian.

“The election only took place yesterday and several of the important international observation missions won’t even make their declarations and assessments until tomorrow,” a senior Biden administration official told reporters in a briefing. “You’re seeing a greater alignment between a number of key actors in the international community that is pushing the Venezuelan National Electoral Council towards greater transparency.”

Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, all important regional players with better relations with the Venezuelan government, also called for more information.

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador told reporters in Mexico City on Monday that he’d hold off on recognizing Maduro as the winner until the National Electoral Council released final results “confirming the trend.”

Colombia’s foreign ministry also reiterated its desire to see complete election results. And Brazil’s foreign ministry called for an “impartial verification” of the vote count and “transparency.”

“The main reason we are cautious is that they have not made the results public, polling site by polling site. What the government has given so far is a single number, but they need to show how they arrived at that number: record by record,” said Celso Amorim, a foreign policy adviser to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Brazil’s main election observer in the country, in comments to Brazilian outlet Globo.

Under Venezuela’s constitution, the National Electoral Council — which administers and oversees national elections — is required to release precinct by precinct results that can be verified and double-checked. While the Council has declared Maduro the winner, it has yet to publicly release those granular results.

Venezuela and its allies in the region have defended the sanctity of the vote and accused American and other foreign officials of “interfering” in the election. Venezuela’s attorney general opened an investigation Monday into opposition leader María Corina Machado on charges she “sabotaged” the elections.

In the past, the Biden administration has been quick to reject results from other questionable elections like Nicaragua’s 2021 election and Belarus’ February elections. But U.S. caution highlights Venezuela’s precarious conditions.

The disputed results could spark massive nationwide protests and intense government reprisals, which could further destabilize the country . Further chaos could also exacerbate migration pressures in the region. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans have fled their country since 2014, many seeking asylum in the U.S. and settling in Texas and Florida.

The cautious response also could be an indication that the U.S. sees a possibility that Maduro could be forced to negotiate an exit and wants to avoid tainting that process by prematurely joining calls for a change in government.

On Capitol Hill, both Democrats and Republicans have voiced their solidarity with the Venezuelan people, but Republicans want the White House to do more. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) called on the Biden administration to “stand against any and all efforts by the criminal Chavista regime to steal its way out of today’s clear election results” in a post on X.

Republican lawmakers that represent states and districts with large Venezuelan communities have criticized the administration’s pre-election strategy, which included offering Caracas sanctions relief in exchange for guarantees of a free and fair voting..

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee who represents Florida’s large Venezuelan community, wrote on X that “Biden & Harris broadly eased Trump sanctions on Maduro regime as part of a “deal” for elections in #Venezuela. Today was that election and it was a complete fraud.”

“Maduro has stolen another election from the Venezuelan people & the Biden-Harris admin helped him do it by fueling his power with sanctions relief & appeasement. Edmundo González won & he must be recognized as President-elect,” said Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) in a post on X.

Isabella Ramírez contributed to this report. 

Speaker Mike Johnson and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries rolled out members of a bipartisan task force Monday to investigate the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.

“We have the utmost confidence in this bipartisan group of steady, highly qualified, and capable Members of Congress to move quickly to find the facts, ensure accountability, and help make certain such failures never happen again,” Johnson and Jeffries said in a joint statement.

The task force will be led by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.), who represents Butler, Pennsylvania, the site of the shooting at a campaign rally.

The rollout of the members comes after the House voted unanimously last week to form the task force, which will need to release its final report by mid-December. Johnson and Jeffries spent days talking behind the scenes as they tried to land on a bipartisan way forward for the group.

The formation of the task force is meant to wrangle the House’s various ongoing investigations into the assassination attempt, with the House Oversight, Homeland Security and Judiciary committees already standing up their own probes in the wake of the shooting.

The new group will have control and jurisdiction over any other House investigations. Beyond congressional investigations, the administration is conducting several probes, including through the FBI, an independent panel ordered by President Joe Biden and the Department of Homeland Security inspector general.

In addition to Kelly, the Republicans on the task force will be: Reps. Mark Green (Tenn.), David Joyce (Ohio), Laurel Lee (Fla.), Michael Waltz (Fla.), Clay Higgins (La.) and Pat Fallon (Texas).

Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) will be the top Democrat on the task force. Democratic Reps. Lou Correa (Calif.), Madeleine Dean (Pa.), Chrissy Houlahan (Pa.), Glenn Ivey (Md.) and Jared Moskowitz (Fla.) will also be on the panel.

House Democrats’ largest super PAC is adding to its already massive fall ad campaign, including targeting three new Republican incumbents as it tries to capitalize on a surge of enthusiasm surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris’ rise.

House Majority PAC is adding $24 million to its initial $186 million in TV and digital reservations in April, according to plans shared first with POLITICO. Most of that new money will bolster the original buy.

But the group, which has close ties to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, has also identified three new offensive targets:

Iowa’s 1st District: HMP is reserving $350,000 worth of ads to boost Democrat Christina Bohannan in a southeast Iowa seat held by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks. 

Wisconsin’s 1st District: The super PAC is booking $725,000 in Milwaukee, where former Democratic Rep. Peter Barca is challenging Rep. Bryan Steil.

Wisconsin’s 3rd District: The group is placing nearly $4 million across three markets in western Wisconsin, where Democrats hope to unseat GOP Rep. Derrick Van Orden.

The decision to go after three additional Republicans is a sign of renewed Democratic confidence after a period of deep malaise.
Democrats need to flip only a handful of seats to retake the House, and they have been basking in a groundswell of optimism and grassroots fundraising after President Joe Biden’s decision to step aside. Democrats had for months feared that Biden would impede their ability to win control of Congress. And after Biden’s flailing debate performance they spent weeks panicking he would tank their chances entirely. Those concerns are now subsiding.

“Over the last several weeks, House Democrats have seen an unprecedented level of support with renewed excitement and momentum,” House Majority PAC President Mike Smith said in a statement. “Our additional reservations are not only expanding the battleground, but also doubling down on offense.”

In Minneapolis, the group is reserving $1.7 million to help Democratic Rep. Angie Craig, who was the first battleground Democrat to call for Biden to bow out of the race. That’s an earmarked donation from a group of donors who sought to reward her for doing so.

The rest of the reservations will re-up existing ones placed in the spring. That includes more than $3 million more in the Los Angeles media market, where Democrats are now dropping a whopping $22.4 million to target GOP-held seats; $6.3 million more in the Philadelphia area, where the party is protecting Rep. Susan Wild and targeting Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick; and $2.2 million more in Flint, Michigan, where Democratic Rep. Dan Kildee is retiring.

On offense, the additional money will up the pressure on Reps. Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.), Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), David Schweikert (R-Ariz.), Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.) Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.) and John Duarte (R-Calif.).

And as HMP looks to defend vulnerable Democrats, the additional money will bolster Reps. Don Davis (D-N.C.), Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.), Emilia Sykes (D-Ohio), Yadira Caraveo (D-Colo.); Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio). Additional money is also helping Democrat Curtis Hertel Jr., who is running for an open seat in Michigan.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Sunday he felt an obligation to hear Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speak to Congress last week — but not to shake the prime minister’s hand.

“I went to this speech because the relationship between Israel and America is ironclad and I wanted to show that,” Schumer (D-N.Y.) said, when asked why he did not shake Netanyahu’s hand in an interview with Robert Costa on CBS “Face the Nation.” “But at the same time, as everyone knows, I have serious disagreements with the way Benjamin Netanyahu has conducted these policies.”

Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Wednesday was warmly received by many of those in attendance, but was met with serious backlash — with dozens of Democrats not attending the speech due to issues with Netanyahu’s handling of the war in Gaza. And even among those that attended, some Democrats issued statements condemning Netanyahu’s remarks.

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who did not attend the address, called Netanyahu’s speech “by far the worst presentation of any foreign dignitary invited and honored with the privilege of addressing the Congress of the United States” in a post on X. When Schumer was asked about Pelosi’s words, and whether he regretted Netanyahu’s invitation to address Congress, Schumer said the Israel-U.S. relationship should not be dependent on any one leader.

“As I’ve said, I wanted to show our ironclad commitment to Israel that transcends any one prime minister or any one president,” Schumer said. “No matter how much you might disagree with that prime minister.”

Congressional Republicans are asking FBI Director Christopher Wray to “correct” his testimony that there was “some question” about whether Donald Trump’s ear was struck by a bullet or shrapnel.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Wray on Friday that accused him of “creating confusion” in a way that “further undercuts the agency’s credibility.” Wray had testified before a House panel Wednesday that it was unclear if Trump had been struck directly by a bullet or shrapnel, prompting Trump’s ire.

“I believe it is very important for you to correct your testimony before Congress on Wednesday when you indicated it is uncertain whether President Donald J. Trump was hit by a bullet, glass, or shrapnel. It is clear to everyone that President Trump survived an assassination attempt by millimeters, as the attempted assassin’s bullet ripped the upper part of his ear,” Graham wrote in the letter.

In the hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, Wray did not contest that the July 13 shooting was an assassination attempt, or that Trump was injured during it.

But in response to a question from Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) about how close a bullet came to killing Trump, Wray said that “my understanding is that either it or some shrapnel is what grazed his ear.” When Kiley followed up to ask if Wray agreed it came “very, very close,” Wray replied: “Yes.”

Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) also asked Wray if the FBI had accounted for where all the bullets fired by the shooter went.

“There’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear. … As I sit here right now, I don’t know whether that bullet, in addition to causing the grazing, could have also landed somewhere else. But I believe we’ve accounted for all the shots and cartridges,” Wray said in response.

The questions were a small piece of an hourslong hearing with Wray, where the FBI director revealed new details about the shooter, including that he used a drone near the rally site hours before Trump spoke, how he acquired the gun he used and that he Googled questions about the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.

But Wray’s comments about potential shrapnel sparked ire among congressional Republicans and Trump himself.

“It was unfortunately a bullet that hit my ear, and hit it hard. There was no glass, there was no shrapnel. … No wonder the once storied FBI has lost confidence of America,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Thursday.

Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), the former White House physician and staunch Trump supporter, also clapped back at Wray, writing in a Friday memo that “there is absolutely no evidence that it was anything other than a bullet.”

In a statement on Thursday, the FBI said it has “been consistent and clear that the shooting was an attempted assassination of former President Trump which resulted in his injury.”

“The FBI’s Shooting Reconstruction Team continues to examine evidence from the scene, including bullet fragments, and the investigation remains ongoing,” the bureau said.

Josh Gerstein contributed to this report.

Rep. Don Davis, a centrist Democrat who often breaks with his party, endorsed Kamala Harris’ presidential bid on Friday, one day after he joined five other Democrats in condemning her handling of the southern border.

“The stakes of this presidential election are incredibly high, with far-reaching implications,” he said in a statement, adding “at the same time, the administration and Congress must address the concerns of the southern border.”

Additionally, Davis (D-N.C.) took the extra step of endorsing a vice presidential pick for Harris: North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper.

He is a first-term lawmaker representing a competitive seat in northeast North Carolina.