Tag

Slider

Browsing

Speaker Mike Johnson said Wednesday he plans to hold a House vote next week on a measure mandating the full disclosure of Justice Department files related to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Johnson announced those plans just hours after newly sworn Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) completed a discharge petition mandating a floor vote on the Epstein measure. His is a quicker timeline than is mandated under the rules governing discharge petitions, which would require a vote in early December.

House Republicans are eager to put the Epstein controversy in the rear-view mirror to the greatest extent possible as they seek to catch up after losing weeks of work due to Johnson’s decision to keep the chamber out of session during the government shutdown.

They are expecting a mass defection of Republican lawmakers on the vote — perhaps 100 or more — despite President Donald Trump calling the Epstein allegations a Democratic hoax.

The House is on track to vote on disclosing files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after a newly sworn-in Democrat completed a bipartisan effort Wednesday to sidestep Republican leaders over the opposition of President Donald Trump.

Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona signed the discharge petition immediately after she was sworn in by Speaker Mike Johnson after a record 50-day wait and delivered remarks critical of the GOP attempts to keep Justice Department files under wraps.

“It’s past time for Congress to restore its role as a check and balance on this administration,” she said, adding, “That is why I will sign the discharge petition right now to release the Epstein files — justice cannot wait another day.”

The vote is expected in early December, according to aides from both parties.

Grijalva had expressed no special interest in the Epstein case prior to her Sept. 23 election. But she became intertwined in the fate of a bipartisan effort to disclose Justice Department files related to the disgraced financier after it became clear she could provide the final necessary signature on a discharge petition forcing a House vote on the matter.

She has had to wait seven weeks to do that, however, with Johnson refusing to seat her as the House stayed out of session for the duration of the government shutdown.

Democrats have railed against the speaker, accusing him of seeking to propagate an Epstein coverup on behalf of Trump. Johnson, in turn, said the wait had nothing to do with Epstein and everything to do with Senate Democrats’ refusal to pass a House-approved measure to reopen the government. The lengthy delay prompted a lawsuit by the Arizona attorney general that is now rendered moot.

Grijalva played down her connection to the Epstein push in a brief interview Wednesday, saying it was “not what I was elected to do.” But she added that she still planned to sign: “It sort of continues this push that the American people have to really demand transparency and consequences, legal consequences for anyone implicated in those files.”

Her addition to the House also narrows Republicans’ majority to 219-214, meaning Johnson can now lose only two votes if all members are voting. Grijalva’s first votes will be on the funding package to end the shutdown.

Grijalva, a former member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors, won a special election to fill the seat held by her late father Rep. Raúl Grijalva, a longtime progressive leader, who died in March at 77.

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

House Democrats believe there will be overwhelming support from Republicans on an inevitable floor vote on a bill that would compel the Justice Department to quickly release materials related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker Mike Johnson is scheduled Wednesday afternoon to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose addition to the House will provide the 218th vote on a so-called discharge petition — a procedural maneuver that allows rank-and-file members to end-run leadership and force the vote on legislation, in this case the measure demanding the release of the Epstein files.

Assuming the bill gets passed in the House, it would still require approval by the Senate and to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. Senate GOP leaders have not guaranteed they would hold a vote in their chamber.

But Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the co-sponsor of the bill with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), told reporters Wednesday he believed “40 to 50” Republicans would join Democrats in supporting the bill in the House.

“If we get that kind of overwhelming vote, that’s going to push the Senate, and it’s going to push for a release of the files from the Justice Department,” Khanna said.

Trump officials are still waging an intense pressure campaign to get at least one of three House Republican women to remove their name from the discharge effort, according to two people granted anonymity to share private conversations. If that push is successful, it would complicate efforts to get the measure on the floor in the first place, as Republicans are more likely to vote in favor of the legislation itself than they are to sign onto a discharge petition seen as an outwardly antagonistic gesture toward leadership.

Democrats’ optimism is growing, though, following the release of an explosive new email suggesting that Trump knew of Epstein’s sex trafficking activities. That correspondence was singled out by Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, part of a huge tranche of files from the Epstein estate the panel rolled out Wednesday. Republicans have claimed Democrats were selectively releasing the materials as part of an effort to damage Trump.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the Oversight panel, maintained that his team publicized key documents as soon as they were able to review the trove of new materials.

“It’s always interesting that Republicans … only when we release a certain batch, will they then follow up and say, ‘Oh, you shouldn’t release that,’” he told reporters.

Garcia said he had “talked to numerous Republicans that are planning to vote ‘yes.’”

House Judiciary ranking member Jamie Raskin of Maryland said in an interview that the new materials confirmed long-held suspicions among Democrats about Trump’s ties to Epstein.

“Of course, Donald Trump knew what was going on,” Raskin said. “Jeffrey Epstein was his best friend, and there’s a reason that they flocked together.”

Trump has denied wrongdoing in relation to the Epstein allegations. No evidence has so far suggested that Trump took part in Epstein’s trafficking operation. The president also has maintained that he and Epstein had a falling out years ago.

Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

The White House committed in writing Wednesday that President Donald Trump will sign the bill to end the longest government shutdown in U.S. history once the House passes it.

In a statement of administration policy, the Trump administration urged every lawmaker to back the measure, which would reopen the government through Jan. 30 and fund some federal agencies through next September. The House is expected to vote Wednesday evening to clear the legislation for Trump’s signature, after the Senate passed the package Monday night.

Even as the White House encouraged House lawmakers to vote in support of the bipartisan measure, the administration took partisan swipes in the official memo, claiming that the funding lapse was “forced upon the American people by congressional Democrats.”

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has won the backing of a key Republican senator who had earlier threatened to vote against him over concerns about the agency’s handling of workplace harassment.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said he will support acting FDIC Chair Travis Hill, who is Trump’s pick to permanently lead the agency. Kennedy’s endorsement clears a major hurdle for Hill, whose nomination has broad backing from the banking industry and other Senate Republicans, and paves the way for a vote in the Senate Banking Committee.

Kennedy last month threw up a surprise roadblock when he said he wouldn’t vote for Hill until the FDIC produced a report detailing how it has addressed sexual harassment and other workplace misconduct. Kennedy said at the time he had “heard nothing” from Hill about the issue since he took over as acting chair in January.

“I am satisfied with the progress the agency is making,” Kennedy said in a statement Tuesday. “I intend to vote to confirm Mr. Travis Hill as FDIC Chairman. This is no country for creepy old men.”

Kennedy’s office released the FDIC report he requested, which outlined “long-overdue plans” to improve the agency’s workplace culture and confirmed that progress was underway.

According to the report, 26 employees “left the agency specifically due to substantiated allegations of misconduct” in the 2025 fiscal year— either because they were fired or resigned before they could be terminated. The report also detailed previously announced efforts to revamp the complaint process, bolster training and establish new offices focused on professional conduct and cracking down on harassment.

“I have instituted new leadership across the agency, and today not a single FDIC executive with substantiated allegations of misconduct remains with the agency,” Hill wrote in the report.

The issue drew scrutiny from Democrats as well. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the Banking Committee’s top Democrat, criticized Hill at his confirmation hearing last month, arguing there was “no record” he took action to address the FDIC’s toxic workplace culture before it was exposed in 2023.

The revelations about widespread harassment and discrimination, which emerged during the Biden administration, engulfed former FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg’s final months in office last year. Under pressure from lawmakers, the longtime Democratic appointee agreed to step down in May 2024 once a successor was confirmed. But the Senate never voted on President Joe Biden’s nominee. Gruenberg ultimately resigned the day before Trump’s second inauguration earlier this year.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez laid the blame Wednesday for a disappointing deal ending the 43-day government shutdown at the feet of Senate Democrats as a whole — not just Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — noting there were “eight Democrats who coordinated” with Republicans to end the standoff.

“There’s a lot of focus rightfully on Leader Schumer, but I do think that when it comes to the Senate, it is Senate Democrats that select their leadership,” Ocasio-Cortez said about her fellow New York Democrat in a brief interview. “And so I actually think this problem is much bigger than Leader Schumer.”

Ocasio-Cortez, a leader of the party’s progressive wing, put Schumer on blast in March after he voted to advance Republican legislation to keep the government open. Some House Democrats have privately floated support for a potential Ocasio-Cortez primary bid against Schumer in 2028, something she has neither embraced nor ruled out.

Asked on Wednesday if she has confidence in Schumer as leader, Ocasio-Cortez said she “certainly disagreed with what just happened.”

“We had a responsibility to develop, to deliver on health care subsidies, and the Senate failed to do that,” she added.

Ocasio-Cortez, in later remarks to reporters, acknowledged the calls for her to mount a 2028 Senate run, potentially against Schumer, but again sidestepped questions about her intentions.

“That is years from now,” she said. “I have to remind my own constituents, because they think that this election is this year.”

Schumer did not endorse or vote for the agreement that eight members of his caucus reached with Republicans that will reopen the government open but will not guarantee an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act tax credits that Democrats are fighting for. But those calling for new leadership point to the fact that he couldn’t keep his caucus together and didn’t do more to head off the effort.

At least five House Democrats have called for Schumer to step aside as the party’s leader in the Senate. No Democratic senators have done so.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this report misstated Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s title.

The late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein alleged that President Donald Trump knew about the girls he was trafficking, according to new emails from Epstein’s estate released by Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Wednesday morning.

The new emails are part of a trove of materials handed over by Epstein’s estate to congressional investigators on the Oversight panel, which has been investigating the Epstein case for months.

The committee has also subpoenaed the Department of Justice for records around its handling of the Epstein case, but the administration has turned over relatively few non-public materials. Democrats have alleged it is part of a cover-up.

“Trump said he asked me to resign, never a member ever,” Epstein wrote in a 2019 email to Michael Wolff, an apparent plea from the president for Epstein to leave Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club. “[O]f course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

Wolff, the recipient, is likely the journalist who has written at length about the Trump presidency. He was referencing Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted Epstein co-conspirator currently serving prison time for her alleged crimes.

Epstein also wrote in an email in 2011 to Maxwell that Trump was a “dog that hasn’t barked” — what appeared to mean that Trump had not disclosed details about Epstein’s activities. Epstein added that a victim, whose name was redacted, spent hours with Trump.

Trump has denied wrongdoing in relation to the Epstein allegations. No evidence has so far suggested that Trump took part in Epstein’s trafficking operation. The president also has maintained that he and Epstein had a falling out years ago.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday morning.

Jack Schlossberg officially entered the race to fill an open New York City House seat on Wednesday, the latest in a long line of Kennedys to join the political arena.

A Democratic influencer and grandson of former President John F. Kennedy, Schlossberg has cultivated a dedicated following on social media in recent years and recently served as a political correspondent at Vogue ahead of the 2024 election. Now, he hopes to parlay his notoriety into a successful campaign for a deep-blue New York House seat being vacated by the dean of New York’s congressional delegation, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.). Nadler announced his plans not to seek reelection in September.

POLITICO reported last week that Schlossberg planned to enter the race.

“I’m not running because I have all the answers to our problems,” he said in a video announcement. “I’m running because the people of New York 12 do. I want to listen to your struggles, hear your stories, amplify your voice, go to Washington and execute on your behalf.”

Schlossberg cast his campaign as a cog in the broader Democratic effort to stymie President Donald Trump’s political agenda — and to quash any talk of a third term.

“We deserve better, and we can do better, and it starts with the Democratic Party winning back control of the House of Representatives,” he said. “With control of Congress, there’s nothing we can’t do. Without it, we’re helpless to a third term.”

Though the president has mused about running again for president in 2028 — and sold plenty of merch attesting to future electoral ambitions — Trump in October conceded he cannot run again under the Constitution.

But while Schlossberg boasts prodigious skill on social media, alongside more than 1.5 million followers on TikTok and Instagram, he’s far from the favorite in the coming Democratic primary for the House seat.

That would be New York Assemblymember Micah Lasher, Nadler’s heir apparent and a key political ally to many in New York.

The longest government shutdown in U.S. history should come to an end Wednesday night.

The House is planning to return around 4 p.m. Wednesday and start voting soon after Speaker Mike Johnson swears in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-N.M.).

If all goes as planned, the shutdown-ending bill should be passed and on its way to President Donald Trump in just a few hours.

Under the plan advanced by the Rules Committee early Wednesday morning after a seven-hour meeting, GOP leaders are preparing for a swift process. Following the rule vote, there will be one hour of debate and a vote on final passage. No amendments have been made in order.

Democrats are planning to cast a procedural vote on the rule as an opportunity to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies, two people with knowledge of the plans tell Meredith Lee Hill. But Republicans will block it, and there are no other plans right now to delay a final vote.

The typical GOP defectors, meanwhile, are quiet. Even if the likes of Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) or Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) oppose it, Johnson can afford to lose their votes. Democrats are whipping their caucus against the bill, but a few centrists could break ranks.

Don’t expect members to hang around after the vote. The House will adjourn for the weekend and return Monday through Friday of next week before Thanksgiving break.

But there is already a busy schedule set for next week, with committees expediting what they were expected to do over the past seven weeks. GOP leaders have already advised members to expect longer votes and extra committee work.

And even after the government is open, the pressure is already on to avoid another shutdown. The new stopgap funding plan punts the next deadline to Jan. 30 — meaning appropriators will have to get to work almost immediately to avoid another shutdown cliff in just two months.

What else we’re watching:   

— GOP grumblings at Leg Branch provision: Republicans at the House Rules Committee hearing said they were annoyed at language added to the funding bill by Senate Majority Leader John Thune that would let senators sue the government for having their electronic data records collected. Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said he was “surprised” to see the language inserted to the funding bill.

— Epstein files discharge petition: Tuesday afternoon Speaker Mike Johnson will swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), who will provide the final and clinching signature on the discharge petition led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). From there, the petition will take seven legislative days to ripen before Johnson has two legislative days to schedule a vote. Senior aides in both parties predict a vote will come the first week of December.

— Committee watch: House GOP leadership is telling members to expect lots of committee catch-up work and late nights once the chamber returns to action Wednesday. NDAA negotiations, permitting overhaul and NCAA name, image and likeness legislation are on the agenda for committees when the House is back.

Jordain Carney and Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.

ALBANY, New York — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s omnipresence in New York state politics has been his calling card for the past three decades — until now.

New York’s senior senator has delivered hundreds of college commencement addresses over the years and made countless cameos at everything from parades to road races to strangers’ barbecues. Locally, nothing has defined his brand more than a 26-year streak of annual visits to each of the state’s 62 counties.

But Schumer has been largely absent of late: He only made official visits to 30 of the 57 counties outside of New York City as Thanksgiving nears and he toned down his presence on the commencement address circuit this spring. The senator has also been anything but a kingmaker in a changing state Democratic party — notably opting out of endorsing in this year’s New York City mayoral race as Zohran Mamdani drove turnout to levels not seen since the 1960s.

Democrats across the spectrum attribute his relative absence in the Empire State to the increasingly all-consuming nature of the current Washington landscape. Much of his energy there has been spent negotiating a path out of the federal government shutdown, an effort that isn’t winning him many friends among the party faithful at home.

“We’re in a new moment we’ve never been in before,” said Jasmine Gripper, co-director of the state Working Families Party. “The reality is I’m not sure if New Yorkers really want Chuck Schumer showing up in their backyards. What I really want to know is that Chuck Schumer is in D.C. fighting to protect our democracy.”

Those fights in Washington have done nothing to boost his political standing. His vote to keep the government open in March antagonized the left. His refusal to do so in September angered the right. Now, his inability to keep his conference united has upset not just the left, with some progressives calling for his resignation, but has left moderates like Gov. Kathy Hochul fuming over the lack of unity in the conference Schumer leads. That weakness has stoked talk of a potential primary challenge from a younger, more progressive opponent like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

If the 74-year-old senator wants to rebound before he potentially seeks a sixth term in 2028 — which would keep him in office until he’s 84 — it’s becoming increasingly apparent he’ll need to do so without his traditional style of obsessively local politicking: If the White House eliminates an executive agency on a Friday, for example, Schumer would risk exposing himself to horrible optics if he spent the weekend, say, back in New York fighting to reduce goose droppings. Or looking to ban inhalable caffeine. Or going to war against metal barbeque brushes.

But Schumer’s team has suggested that reading the tea leaves of his schedule too deeply would be misguided.

“Current challenges in D.C., including the Trump shutdown, require his presence and leadership,” Schumer spokesman Angelo Roefaro said. “He is working ‘round the clock to deliver on behalf of New Yorkers, including the fight for affordable health care — all while President Trump recklessly attacks everything from the Second Avenue subway and Gateway to Medicaid.”

Critics, however, say it’s evidence he’s slowing down.

“He’s phasing himself out. I don’t think he’ll run in 2028,” New York GOP chair Ed Cox said. “He’s getting old and he knows where the country is. He also knows where his party is, and that AOC can easily beat him.”

Chuck Around NY

The most famous form of Schumer’s ubiquitousness has been his practice of crashing college graduation ceremonies every Saturday in June. Countless families have stories. And many of those yarns follow a similar trajectory: like attending a daughter’s commencement in Buffalo and hearing the senator discuss the time he was dumped by a girl and lost a scholarship — then attending their son’s event on Long Island the next year and hearing the same exact speech. He once delivered 15 commencement addresses in nine days.

As recently as 2023, social media posts indicate he showed up at Brooklyn College, SUNY Albany, the New York City College of Technology, Hunter College, Fordham Law, SUNY Stony Brook, John Jay and SUNY Cortland. The only mention in student newspapers or on three major social media sites about Schumer’s attendance at a commencement this June came from the Fordham Observer, which reported the regular attendee was “notably absent.”

Schumer’s website tags certain events with a “Chuck Around New York” label to showcase his stops around the state that form the basis for his 62 county boast. He spent decades topping 150 news conferences in New York each year. In 2010, he managed to hit 283.

But the number began to drop when he was elevated in the Senate and became Democratic leader in 2017. His highest total since then was 124 stops across the state in 2019.

His local appearances have dropped off even more this year. He was at only 44 official visits in mid-November, on pace for a record low. Those visits cover only 48 percent of the state’s counties with the new year fast approaching. The most recent event listed occurred on Sept. 15.

There are certainly plenty of informal appearances that aren’t included in the tallies of his stops. In the past few months, Schumer has stopped by the Buffalo Bills’ training camp, marched in New York City’s Labor Day Parade, and joined a No Kings Protest. But that’s also true in past years — and by many anecdotal accounts, these cameos have been less common as the senator is stuck spending time near the Potomac more often than he is near the Hudson.

Roefaro insisted the minority leader has kept busy on the homefront.

“As he has for every year in the Senate, Senator Schumer continues to crisscross the state’s 62 counties and New York City’s five boroughs,” he said. “The senator has a track record of success and an indefatigable omnipresence that will continue to power these efforts.”

Sunday presser fatigue 

The senator often topped 60 percent favorability in polls a decade ago. But that dipped once he became leader, with him hovering for several years with numbers along the lines of 50-38.

This year, he’s hit record lows among numerous pollsters, repeatedly landing with a favorability rating closer to 35 percent.

“There was a large percentage of Republicans who liked Chuck Schumer,” Siena spokesman Steve Greenberg said. “But once he became minority leader, he was seen — understandably so — as a much more partisan figure, and as a result lost a lot of Republicans.”

Schumer’s favorability among Republicans has fallen from 49-39 to 22-71 over the past decade. He’s seen a nearly equal drop among Democrats too: The senator has gone from 73-16 to 47-42.

Democrats are now also judging Schumer largely based on his role as it pertains to the White House. And it’s clear plenty in his own party aren’t happy: He canceled a book tour in the spring over “security concerns” once progressives started assailing him for his role in advancing a Republican funding plan, and he wasbooed at the Metropolitan Opera in September for not supporting Mamdani.

All of it adds up to a tougher landscape to engage in the retail politicking that has driven his success for so long.

Schumer was once widely known as the man who invented the Sunday press conference. Whether he was spending the end of the weekend in Chateaugay bemoaning an attempt to trademark the word “parmesan,” or announcing millions of dollars of transportation funding on Long Island, he found ways to dominate the news cycle on a day when not much else was happening.

His last “Chuck Around New York” appearance in New York on a Sunday came when he attended Rep. George Latimer’s ceremonial oath of office in January.

Fast forward to the fall, and the political headaches have only mounted for Schumer.

Perhaps the biggest takeaway of last week’s elections is that New York City Democrats are open to a generational shift in leadership. Schumer hails from two political generations ago — New Year’s Day, 1975, his first in the state Assembly, was the same day Mario Cuomo began his career in state government. That was 17 years before Mamdani was born.

And the Mamdani faction certainly isn’t rushing to embrace the minority leader.

“We gotta go,” the mayor-elect said when asked by POLITICO last week whether Schumer should face a 2028 challenge.

Mamdani had lunch with Ocasio-Cortez that same day.

While Schumer was a no vote on the Senate’s compromise plan, it’s clear that even moderate Democrats aren’t happy with the way his conference handled it: “This deal paves the way for devastating premium hikes that will drive up costs for New Yorkers,” said Gov. Kathy Hochul, a rare critic of her fellow party members.

And fairly or not, political observers are getting the message that Schumer’s to blame for the compromise.

“Either all eight senators who voted to capitulate coincidentally are not up for reelection in 2026, or Chuck Schumer worked behind the scenes to give into the Republicans while still protecting vulnerable Democrats — including himself,” Jon Stewart said Monday night on the Daily Show.

All that being said, plenty of time remains for Schumer to increase his visibility before a reelection run. And even his past foes say it’s too soon to count him out.

“Don’t underestimate Sen. Schumer,” said former Sen. Al D’Amato, who was ousted by Schumer in 1998. “He’s tough, he’s in a difficult position right now, but the election is almost three years away. So I wouldn’t predict his demise — and I think those who do are making a mistake.”