Rep. Clay Higgins deleted a social media post Wednesday with racist tropes about Haitians after swift backlash from his congressional colleagues, including a call to censure him on the House floor.

Higgins (R-La.) wrote a post on the platform X — using his official congressional account — that called Haitians “wild” and added: “Eating pets, vudu, nastiest country in the western hemisphere, cults, slapstick gangster … but damned if they don’t feel all sophisticated now, filing charges against our President and VP. All these thugs better get their mind right and their ass out of our country before January 20th.”

He included a screenshot of a news story about a Haitian group filing charges against former President Donald Trump and Vice Presidential nominee JD Vance in response to false claims the Republican nominees had spread about migrants in Springfield, Ohio.

Higgins took down the post within a couple of hours, after several lawmakers confronted him on the House floor Wednesday and said it was inappropriate. That group included Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) one of a handful of Black Republicans in Congress.

“I told him my thoughts. I thought it was not a good statement. I thought he should take it down, and we just talked it through, and he went ahead and did that, and that’s to his credit,” Donalds said.

Higgins’ office did not respond to a request for comment.

Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, was also part of the group who spoke with Higgins. Shortly after, he took to the House floor surrounded by members of his bloc to denounce Higgins’ post, call for the House Ethics Committee to look into the matter and demand that Higgins be formally reprimanded on the House floor.

“These words on an official post do not reflect credibly on the House. in fact, they are inciting hate. They are inciting fear. And because of that it is time for this body to stand with one voice and to ensure that there’s accountability,” he said.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries slammed Higgins’ post as “disgusting and dangerous.”

Top Republicans said Higgins did the proper thing by deleting the post and that lawmakers needed to move on.

“He prayed about it, and he regretted it, and he pulled the post down. That’s what you want the gentleman to do. I’m sure he probably regrets some of the language he used. But you know, we move forward,” said Speaker Mike Johnson.

Higgins, a conservative Republican, has previously courted controversy on social media, and Facebook had once removed a post for “incitement” after he called for using force against armed protesters.

Anthony Adragna, Katherine Tully-McManus and Daniella Diaz contributed to this report.

In Congress’ last action before Election Day, the Senate cleared a stopgap funding bill Wednesday night that heads off a government shutdown next week, bucking the demands of former President Donald Trump.

President Joe Biden is expected to quickly sign the measure, preventing a funding lapse Tuesday and delaying the government shutdown deadline to Dec. 20. It also punts a potentially bitter funding fight to just before Christmas, with the results hinging on the November elections and which party wins control of the House, Senate and White House.

Despite Trump’s calls this month for Republicans to shut down the government unless they passed a bill to prevent noncitizen voting, the outcome was “more or less the result people expected from the beginning,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said this week.

Most lawmakers have acknowledged all year that Congress would end up resorting to a bipartisan funding patch until late November or December. But Speaker Mike Johnson still spent weeks trying to pass a partisan alternative, amid private discussions with Trump and the former president’s public urging on social media.

“I’m not defying President Trump. We’re getting our job done, and I think he understands that,” Johnson told reporters, after privately making the case this week to his House Republican conference that a government shutdown ahead of Election Day would cost the GOP votes at the ballot box.

Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris — whoever is elected president Nov. 5 — is expected to influence whether Congress wraps up a final funding deal in December or punts again, pushing negotiations into the next presidency.

“That person, whether it’s Vice President Harris or former President Trump, will basically tell their side: ‘I want a deal,’ or ‘I want to handle it,’” House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) predicted.

It’s a familiar position for Trump; Congress faced a December funding deadline after he was elected president in 2016. Congressional Republicans, having won majorities in the House and Senate that year, kicked the deadline into the new year.

Trump was not sold on the final massive funding bill, known as an omnibus, Congress sent him the following spring. “The reality is Trump almost accidentally shut down the government,” Cole recalled. “He almost vetoed an omnibus passed by a Republican Senate and a Republican House.”

Due to the limited, “clean” patch Congress cleared Wednesday, every major funding battle is still up in the air as the new fiscal year kicks off next week.

Most federal agencies will be running on current budgets into December, despite the Biden administration’s request for tens of billions of dollars to boost funding for veterans benefits and other agencies reporting shortfalls. FEMA’s disaster relief fund, already in a deficit for work like rebuilding on Maui after last summer’s wildfires, is also expected to need more money in the coming months, even though the new funding bill pumps roughly $20 billion into the disaster fund.

For the Pentagon, the funding patch does not include $2 billion the Biden administration requested to buy more submarines.

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), chair of the defense spending panel, said it’s crucial to U.S. national security that congressional leaders close out funding negotiations in December. “It only empowers our enemies and wastes money,” he said of the stopgap. “So it’s very important we get it done, and get it done right.”

Sometime after Election Day, bipartisan negotiations are expected to begin on a “topline” funding agreement to set two overall totals for military and non-defense spending. Whichever party wins control of the Senate will have a slim majority, necessitating a cross-party compromise to pass any funding measures in that chamber.

If Congress doesn’t clear final spending bills by the new year, funding negotiations will begin to collide with talks to avert two other fiscal cliffs: the debt limit that’s waived until early January and the expiration of many of the 2017 tax cuts at the end of next year.

Conservatives in Congress say negotiations on all of those fiscal issues — debt, taxes and funding — need to be linked and will be a demand of whoever House Republicans choose to be their next leader, whether that’s Johnson or a new speaker.

“It’s going to be a central conversation to the speaker conversation in November, December,” Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said. “There’s a lot of talk about the tax policy and the continuation of the existing tax rates … all of which are pretty likely to increase debt. So we need to have a real conversation about spending.”

The House approved a bill Wednesday night to prevent a government shutdown, punting a slew of tough spending fights to the end of the year.

Speaker Mike Johnson once again relied heavily on Democrats to pass the measure, which would leave federal agencies with static budgets through Dec. 20, provide the embattled Secret Service with an additional $231 million and allow FEMA’s disaster relief fund to scrape by through hurricane season.

The Senate is expected to pass the nearly three-month spending patch later Wednesday night, with members eager to leave Washington and campaign ahead of the Nov. 5 election.

The House passed the so-called continuing resolution in a 341-82 vote, with more Democrats voting for it than Republicans in what’s becoming a typical scenario for Johnson when faced with muscling must-pass spending legislation through the House. A majority of GOP lawmakers backed it, with 132 voting for it and 82 opposing it.

Once President Joe Biden signs the stopgap, officially thwarting a shutdown that would have kicked in on Tuesday, congressional leaders will have exactly 80 days to negotiate a trillion dollar-plus compromise that provides federal agencies with updated budgets for the rest of the fiscal year. Many of the details of those negotiations will depend on who’s set to control Congress and the White House.

“I don’t think you can minimize the importance of the next president,” said Florida Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart, a senior Republican appropriator. “They’ll have a lot of say as to a lot of this. I think we’re speculating on a lot of those things until we know what happens in November.”

Appropriators in both chambers have been pushing to wrap up fiscal 2025 government funding talks before the end of the calendar year, prior to the start of a new administration and new Congress in January.

“Once we get the CR passed, we can all skip that drama and get to the negotiating table and cut to the chase to write serious bipartisan full year funding bills that can be signed into law,” said Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.).

Once lawmakers return from their lengthy recess in mid-November — and have a better understanding of how the power dynamics in Washington are set to shift — they’ll quickly find themselves embroiled in a fight over funding levels for the military and domestic programs.

Those funding levels, negotiated in a debt limit deal last summer by President Joe Biden and former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, will come under renewed scrutiny, as they only allow for a 1 percent funding hike for both defense and non-defense programs. Congressional spending leaders will surely spar over whether a final deal needs to include tens of billions of dollars outside of those funding caps, giving agencies a little more money to work with.

Lawmakers will also have to contend with a multi-billion-dollar budget shortfall at the Department of Veterans Affairs, a rapidly dwindling pot of disaster cash and myriad other issues as both parties jockey for leverage in a post-election landscape. Republicans could also push offsets that Democrats will never accept, like yanking back more money for the IRS.

While the funding fix through Dec. 20 allows a cash-strapped Disaster Relief Fund to keep limping along, lawmakers are stressing that a major infusion of funding will likely be needed by the end of the year. FEMA has been in a disaster-aid deficit, pausing some work in recent weeks that’s not considered “life sustaining” but is still necessary, like rebuilding in Maui after last summer’s wildfires.

“I don’t understand why we’re not doing disaster aid [right now], but we’ll deal with it in December,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democratic appropriator in the House.

“Nothing’s easy,” DeLauro added of the upcoming government funding fight. “We’ll keep at it and we’ll get it done.”

Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.

Speaker Mike Johnson is demanding Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy “immediately” fire the country’s ambassador to the U.S., Oksana Markarova, over what he called a “shortsighted and intentionally political” visit to a Pennsylvania weapons factory that only included Democrats.

“Support for ending Russia’s war against Ukraine continues to be bipartisan, but our relationship is unnecessarily tested and needlessly tarnished when the candidates at the top of the Republican presidential ticket are targeted in the media by officials in your government,” Johnson wrote in a letter on Wednesday.

Johnson further alleged the visit to Scranton, Pennsylvania, purposefully failed to include any Republican officials and said the event “cannot be repeated.” Zelenskyy’s office declined to comment on the letter.

Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who attended the visit with Zelenskyy and faces a competitive reelection this fall, said in a post on social network X on Wednesday that: “Attempts to smear [Zelenskyy’s] visit to our Commonwealth are an insult and a disgrace.”

The letter from Johnson marks the latest political fallout from Sunday’s visit, which sparked GOP anger across the Capitol.

House Oversight Chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) launched his own investigation into the visit earlier Wednesday, while two senior Senate Republicans urged Zelenskyy to stay out of U.S. domestic politics.

Zelenskyy is due to be on Capitol Hill for meetings on Thursday, including with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, among others. There is currently no planned meeting with Johnson.

Veronika Melkozerova contributed to this report.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer launched an investigation on Wednesday into Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s recent visit to an ammunition factory in Pennsylvania.

House Republicans have already cried foul on the visit, which Zelenskyy took to thank the workers at a factory that has supplied critical munitions in Ukraine’s war with Russia, because several Democrats joined him for a public appearance. Comer took a different tack on Wednesday, instead focusing on Zelenskyy visiting a presidential battleground state.

The Kentucky Republican sent letters on Wednesday to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and White House counsel Edward Siskel, accusing the administration of having facilitated potential meddling in the 2024 presidential election. Comer attempted to contrast the trip with former President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial, which focused on his attempt to push Zelenskyy to investigate Joe Biden.

Read Comer’s letters here:

Garland
Austin
Siskel

Congress has locked in plans to leave town Wednesday, as lawmakers move to quickly fund the government and then get out of town for six weeks of campaigning.

The House and Senate are both poised to pass a short-term funding bill that will fund federal agencies through Dec. 20 and avert a government shutdown next week.

The House: The chamber will vote Wednesday evening on the stopgap funding bill. It will come up under an expedited process that requires two-thirds of the House to vote in favor for passage, but it is expected to clear that hurdle with ease.

The question is not if it will pass, but how many defections emerge within the House GOP conference among those frustrated by Speaker Mike Johnson relying on Democratic votes to fund the government.

The Senate: Earlier this week, weekend work was on the table. But that has been set aside: The Senate is set to move swiftly Wednesday night on the spending measure after House passage. On Tuesday night, the upper chamber locked in a time agreement to expedite debate time and speed towards a final vote. Once they receive the House-passed bill, the Senate will debate for up to two hours and then vote.

“I appreciate the work of all the leaders to move forward with this CR. This is how things should be done. Without brinkmanship, without delay,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said after the announcement of the time agreement.

Post-passage, lawmakers in both chambers will be headed to the airport and won’t be back in Washington until after the November election.

In December, they’ll go through the process again. With election outcomes and party control of each chamber in the next Congress decided, lawmakers will hash out new funding levels for the rest of the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.

“I hope — I truly hope — we will continue to see this same bipartisanship in the Senate when we return and we work to fund the government,” Schumer said.

Sweeping failures by the Secret Service directly contributed to a gunman’s ability to carry out an assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump at his July 13 rally, according to an interim Senate report released Wednesday.

The bipartisan report from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee pointed to multiple critical failures by the Secret Service, including ones related to planning for the event, communications and crucial security decisions.

“Every single one of those failures was preventable and the consequences of those failures were dire,” Chair Gary Peters (D-Mich.) told reporters.

The panel accused the Secret Service of failing to clearly lay out responsibilities or plan security. Agency personnel denied to the committee that they were individually responsible or deflected blame, according to the report.

The committee added that the communication failures between the various layers of law enforcement “remain unaddressed” and that they were a “contributing factor” to the attack on July 13. Secret Service agents were working with local law enforcement to provide security during the rally.

In one example included in the report, the Secret Service special agent in charge of the Pittsburgh field office did not have a working radio with him during the July 13 rally, after giving the lead advance agent his original radio because hers was malfunctioning.

The committee also found that the Secret Service did not properly ensure that the building where the gunman accessed the roof was secured during the rally; one counter sniper had an obstructed view of the roof. Local law enforcement, according to the report, told the Secret Service in advance of the rally that they did not have the manpower to cover the building.

A Secret Service official responsible for countering unauthorized drones told the Senate committee that he also requested additional equipment and personnel but those requests were denied. Trump’s Secret Service detail, according to the report, also requested certain assets for July 13 that were not approved.

“What happened here was really an accumulation of errors that produced a perfect storm of stunning failure,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “A lot of these individual failings, if corrected at the time, might have prevented this tragedy.”

According to the committee’s interim report, Secret Service personnel were notified of a suspicious person with a rangefinder around the building roughly 27 minutes before the shooting. But the Secret Service’s lead advance agent, site agent and site counterpart all told the committee that they did not receive that information until after shots were fired.

And a Secret Service counter sniper told the committee that they also saw local law enforcement running toward the building where the shooter was located with their guns drawn, but that it “did not cross [his] mind” to alert Trump’s protective detail to get him off the stage.

As part of its interim report, the committee is making a series of recommendations, including increasing planning for protective events and designating a single individual responsible for approving all plans. They are recommending that Congress require the Secret Service to record radio transmissions for all protectee events, as well as having the agency send additional resources and assets to future events.

Countersnipers were sent to the rally in response to a “credible intelligence” of a threat, according to the report. But the committee noted that “nearly all” of the Secret Service personnel interviewed by the committee said they were not aware of any credible intelligence of a threat.

Even as the committee released its interim report, it made clear that it still has a long list of questions that it wants answered. It also knocked the FBI, which it said had only produced 27 pages of documents. And they are still seeking information from Trump’s team, more information on known threats before July 13, and information related to the crime scene.

“We’ve put a lot of meat on the bones here, but we are a long way from getting the information we need,” said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the top Republican on the investigative subcommittee.

The House and Senate are both set to pass a stopgap funding bill on Wednesday to head off a government shutdown early next week and punt the spending deadline into late December.

Senate leaders reached an agreement Tuesday night to fast-track debate on the funding patch, which will keep federal agencies running on current budgets through Dec. 20. The House will vote first on passage, freeing lawmakers early for a six-week recess in their final stretch of campaigning ahead of Election Day.

Senate passage will clear the bill for President Joe Biden’s signature, avoiding a funding lapse come Tuesday, the first day of the new fiscal year. Whether a final deal can be reached in December to cement new funding levels will depend on Election Day outcomes for party control of the House, Senate and White House.