Tag

Slider

Browsing

Last time Rep. Bill Pascrell faced a serious primary challenge, he ended up winning by a 20-point margin after the Arab American community rallied in support of the New Jersey Democrat. Now that same constituency is turning against him, posing a major threat to the 14-term House member over his stance on the Israel-Hamas war.

Arab Americans protested outside his district office in Paterson, home to Little Ramallah, the largest Palestinian American enclave in the country. They’ve held press conferences demanding a cease-fire and, last week, interrupted a fundraiser to confront him over his pro-Israel position. Most consequentially, some Arab Americans plan to mobilize against the 86-year-old when he seeks reelection next year.

Former supporters now call him a “charlatan” and a “mouthpiece for the dehumanization of Palestinian people.” They say Pascrell’s seeming indifference to their concerns over Israel’s offensive in Gaza and his refusal to back a cease-fire has led them to consider backing Democratic challengers in June — including a former aide.

“You can’t call yourself a friend of the community and then turn your back on them,” said Feras Awwad, a local school board member in the city of Clifton whose grandparents hail from Ein Karem, a village outside Jerusalem. “There’s not a chance in hell anybody’s going to be supporting him.”

The rising tension in Pascrell’s 9th congressional district is a striking reflection of the broader fault lines running through the national Democratic party following Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel. Federal lawmakers have strongly backed Israel’s right to defend itself but, after two months of Israel pummeling Gaza, killing about 20,000 people, they’ve faced increasing pressure from the left to push for an end to the offensive.

One of the biggest names to join calls for a cease-fire is Rep. Katie Porter, a California Democrat running for that state’s open Senate seat in 2024. But the vast majority of Democrats in Washington take the same view Pascrell expressed at a fundraiser Monday in Paterson.

“I can’t control the politics of Israel,” he said, according to a video of his remarks obtained by POLITICO. “But they have every right to protect themselves and defend themselves. Case closed.”

While Arab Americans are an important constituency for Pascrell, they make up a relatively small bloc in a district that includes two dozen towns in heavily Jewish Bergen County. That’s made it impossible for the representative to please the entire Democratic base.

Pascrell has tried since the Oct. 7 attacks to tread a fine rhetorical line. He backed a “humanitarian pause” and pushed for more aid into Gaza, but, like most House members, did not sign onto a resolution calling for a cease-fire (his Democratic colleagues Rep. Bonnie Watson-Coleman and Donald Payne Jr. were the only lawmakers from New Jersey to do so).

In public statements and in letters to the White House, Pascrell has pushed for the release of hostages and advocated for “good faith efforts” between Palestinians and Israelis to reach a two-state solution. Until then, he said that “restraint to protect innocent civilian lives” is the most prudent path forward.

“I hear and feel powerfully the anguish of our community and like millions of Americans I desperately want a permanent end to the fighting as soon as possible and a major flow of humanitarian aid provided by America to protect Palestinians and begin the rebuilding of Gaza,” Pascrell said in a statement to POLITICO.

Some of his constituents don’t accept his public statements as enough. Since the start of the war, members of the Arab American community have met with Pascrell and other federal and state leaders, including Rep. Mikie Sherrill, Sen. Cory Booker and Gov. Phil Murphy, expressing their concerns and pressing them to support a cease-fire. But some residents and leaders said they don’t feel Pascrell has been receptive and have made it clear to him that he is no longer welcome in their mosques, businesses and homes given his unwavering support for Israel.

“He’s been somebody who in past years had been engaged in the community,” said Ahmet Akdag, a resident of Clifton who is both Turkish and Muslim. “We just don’t feel like he’s been reciprocating as we had hoped and what we had expected.”

A native of Paterson who served as its mayor and in the New Jersey Legislature before his 1996 election to the House, Pascrell is one of New Jersey’s more colorful political figures. He is well known for speaking passionately with a North Jersey accent — and at considerable length — when given the opportunity, whether it’s on the House floor or at a local press conference.

His style and stances have endeared him in the past to the Arab American community. Other Muslim leaders said Pascrell had been much more responsive to them in the past, particularly in 2012, when he was forced into a Democratic primary in the newly redrawn 9th district against incumbent Rep. Steve Rothman. Pascrell, who was then representing the 8th district, was seen within the Arab American community as a strong alternative to the Jewish, staunchly pro-Israel Rothman.

Salaheddin Mustafa, who helped lead the grassroots Muslim effort to make Pascrell the Democratic nominee in 2012, recalls inviting Pascrell to an office on nearby Route 46 to fill him in on their plans to organize support by going town by town in the new district.

“We led, he followed,” said Mustafa, who is also outreach director for the Islamic Center of Passaic County.

Pascrell trounced Rothman in the primary, capturing 61 percent of the vote. The Record newspaper reported that year that Pascrell won 90 percent of the vote in the new district’s six Passaic County towns — including Paterson, which has the second largest Arab American community in the country, according to the city.

But that level of support seems unattainable following Israel’s invasion of Gaza and a death toll that hits close to home. More than 1,000 Palestinians with relatives in North Jersey have been killed in the conflict, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ New Jersey chapter. The council’s vice chair, Ali Aljarrah, was one of the protesters at the fundraiser. He said Pascrell’s response since Oct. 7 contrasts with the person the Arab American community helped reelect.

“He was the guy. He was essentially like our T.E. Lawrence in Congress,” he said, referring to the British diplomat known as Lawrence of Arabia. “That’s why Arabs got involved. They saw Steve Rothman in 2012 as this pro-Zionist candidate, and you have a lot of Arabs who live in the district who just did not want someone who would toe the party line. …. That’s why they went out and got Pascrell elected.”

Now, he said, Pascrell is the one toeing the party line.

Muslim residents say they may have found someone more aligned with them in Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh, a former Pascrell communications assistant. Sayegh is of Syrian and Lebanese descent, speaks Arabic and has been among the few politicians in New Jersey to vocally back a cease-fire. He declined to comment on speculation he will run for Pascrell’s seat. But he told the Paterson Press, after it reported his recent political donations to organizations in Bergen and Hudson county towns that make up the 9th district, that “if you have ambition and ability, you shouldn’t restrict your opportunities.”

Any challenger would face difficulties against Pascrell. He has strong organizational support and, despite its large Arab population, the 9th district is also dominated by heavily Jewish towns in neighboring Bergen County. But the frustrations and disappointments with Pascrell extend beyond the Arab American community to younger, more liberal and even some Jewish voters in the district, Mustafa said. The goal is to build a political infrastructure for the long term “so that our community doesn’t have to deal with charlatans like Congressman Pascrell,” he said.

“It’s not the community that he knew on October 6,” Mustafa said. “It’s a much more unified community. It’s a much more demanding community. It’s a community that’s not going to allow people like Pascrell to use us for his own personal gain and abandon us like he’s doing now.”

Speaker Mike Johnson is pressing President Joe Biden to take executive action to address the surge in crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border.

In a letter Thursday to the White House, Johnson said the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol is at a “breaking point” as it tries to combat illegal migration and he argued the “catastrophe” requires Biden’s “full attention and commitment.”

Johnson said the president should take actions to turn back or detain those who cross the border, restart construction of former President Donald Trump’s border wall, craft expedited removal procedures for migrants who can’t meet asylum requirements, as well as cease the “exploitation of parole authority.”

“All of this is the direct result of your administration’s policies,” Johnson wrote. “You have clearly undermined America’s sovereignty and security by ending the Remain in Mexico policy, reinstating catch-and-release, suspending asylum cooperative agreements with other nations, ignoring existing restraints on the abuse of parole, and halting border wall construction.”

The letter comes amid ongoing bipartisan negotiations on a potential deal to pair Biden’s $100 billion-plus national security spending plan with stricter border policies. But negotiators aren’t expected to secure a deal before next year, with the House and Senate already breaking for the holidays. As POLITICO reported this week, Johnson has told allies he does not plan to call the House to return before their scheduled return date of Jan. 9.

In the letter, Johnson also touted the House GOP’s border bill to argue that the onus is on the Biden administration to take action.

But that conservative measure is a non-starter in the Democratic-controlled Senate. Meanwhile, progressives and Hispanic Caucus members have raised concerns about the agreements being made by the bipartisan Senate working group, which has kept its work largely secretive.

Still, the Biden administration is increasingly more focused on addressing the border heading into an election year, as polls indicate that voters disapprove of the president’s handling of the topic so far.

The Senate sent back more than 50 nominations to President Joe Biden as it wrapped its work for 2023 on Wednesday, most notably that of acting Labor Secretary Julie Su.

Those nominees will have to be resubmitted by the president and begin the Senate confirmation process anew, since the chamber didn’t approve them within the calendar year. The positions range from Cabinet-level posts like Su’s to appeals court judicial nominees to ambassadors, but also less visible roles like ones on the Merit Systems Protection Board and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

“It is clear Ms. Su lacks the necessary votes for confirmation,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), ranking member of the Senate HELP Committee. “I urge President Biden to put forward a nominee who is committed to fair enforcement of our nation’s labor laws and is capable of being confirmed in the Senate.”

Nominees must begin to decide whether to embark again on a confirmation process that, for many, has already taken years. David Uejio, who had his nomination returned to the president, was first nominated for a role at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in June 2021.

Despite already having been confirmed as surgeon general in the Biden administration, Vivek Murthy’s nomination for U.S. representative on the World Health Organization’s executive board will have to be resubmitted.

What did they do? Lawmakers cleared a handful of positions, such as an ambassador to Guatemala and a deputy director for the Peace Corps. They also approved several reappointments to various roles and a handful of inspectors general.

Oh, and they passed a resolution congratulating the Columbus Crew for winning the 2023 Major League Soccer Cup.

Senate Republicans are working closely with Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas as they try to craft a bipartisan border security deal.

Which creates a new problem for the GOP negotiators: If they succeed, they’ll need to sell that deal to colleagues who loathe Mayorkas and, later, House Republicans who are trying to impeach him.

Mayorkas’ role in the high-stakes border talks is confined to policy proposals, not politics. He’s participating to assess border changes without deciding what the White House might ultimately back, according to a person familiar with the talks who was granted anonymity to address them.

His presence is nonetheless a conundrum for Republicans — many of whom will get asked to vote for legislation that bears the mark of a Biden official they have fought for literally a decade.

“I’m skeptical” of the DHS secretary, said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who has clashed with Mayorkas since the Obama administration. “Hearing for three years that the border’s secure when every day, you can see it’s not secure? He’s living in dreamland.”

At the moment, Mayorkas’ talks with Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) are advancing despite facing huge hurdles. They’ve made progress on changes to asylum standards but remain at odds over dialing back the president’s parole authority and new expulsion authority, according to a second person briefed on the talks.

After the Senate left for the year on Wednesday, discussions are set to continue throughout the holiday season. Mayorkas’ involvement may not squash GOP support for any deal to pair new migration limits with Ukraine aid. But it undoubtedly complicates the already delicate task of selling that agreement to Republicans who are loath to compromise.

“I don’t think Mayorkas gets it done. I mean, you’ve seen his performance on the border, it’s worse than abysmal,” Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said. “We have him up for hearings. And he sits there and says the border’s secure. He’s not even dealing with reality.”

In the House, Mayorkas’ impeachment is taking a back seat to the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden — but even GOP lawmakers who don’t favor going that far are not fans of the DHS chief. And one of Republican senators’ biggest challenges is ensuring they cut a deal that the GOP-controlled House can support.

Mayorkas’ presence is particularly tricky on that front, given that support for impeaching him is growing among House Republicans. Even former skeptics like Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) are now ready to boot the DHS chief from office, and Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) is working to court moderates. Gonzales and his centrist allies are some of the same Republicans whom senators hope might vote for any deal on new border restrictions.

And as Republicans recoil, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Mayorkas’ engagement was one of the most critical aspects of the whole talks.

“We made sure Mayorkas was in the room. He’s very, very helpful. He knows the details,” Schumer said in an interview.

Republicans are arguing that Biden will ultimately close any deal, not Mayorkas, since the Cabinet secretary is charged with getting a deal that functionally works, not counting votes. The technical information he provides is integral to the talks, according to senators in both parties.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said that without Mayorkas, “I don’t know how you’d reach an agreement that would work.”

Even those who don’t particularly like him concede that it makes sense for Mayorkas to dig into the negotiations. And he’s certainly not there to be the chief spokesperson: As he enters and exits the Capitol meetings, he does not engage with reporters and rarely utters more than pleasantries.

“He still has the president’s confidence, evidently, so it seems natural to me that he’d be at the table,” said Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.).

As to Mayorkas’ stewardship of the department, Young added: “Pathetic.”

Republicans are livid about Mayorkas’ recent testimony on Capitol Hill that the administration’s approach is “working” as border flows hit daily highs. The GOP’s beef with him is long-standing: He received zero Republican supporters 10 years ago to become deputy secretary and just six GOP votes in 2021 in his confirmation to lead the department.

Many immigration policy advocates and former administration officials view Mayorkas as the administration’s scapegoat on the hot-button issue of immigration. He has the often thankless jobs of unveiling challenging policy announcements and defending the Biden administration’s record, even as immigration policy extends well beyond DHS.

“He’s carrying out the direction from the White House. I believe if he had freer reign, he would take different approaches,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who voted for Mayorkas in 2021. “I hope these bipartisan discussions will give him the tools that he desperately needs.”

Mayorkas lawyered up earlier this year to combat House GOP efforts to impeach him. Protesters even targeted his Washington home. But despite the pressure, a third person who’s worked closely with him — granted anonymity to speak candidly about the secretary — described him as a “good soldier” with a high tolerance for chaos.

While the White House seeks to protect Biden from the deluge of criticism surrounding the border, Mayorkas is occasionally taking heavy blowback from the left as well as Republicans.

“No man has done more to take on … one of the largest policy and political topics in this country than Secretary Mayorkas,” said Jason Houser, the former chief of staff at Immigration and Customs Enforcement under Biden. “The secretary has been out almost on an island.”

Still, some immigration advocates warn Mayorkas’ credibility may suffer if a deal comes together that is opposed by progressives and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Mayorkas “would be forever tied to these policies that he had always previously marked as too extreme,” said one former Biden and Obama administration official, delivering that warning on condition of anonymity.

He is publicly pleading for more border funding, telling lawmakers the $13.6 billion included in the president’s national security funding request would help “tremendously” with border enforcement by providing money for additional personnel and technology. He’s said that he’s open to border policy changes but pushes for broader immigration reform instead of smaller-scale policies.

“We fully endorse the need for policy changes, not in piecemeal form, but in a comprehensive form,” Mayorkas told lawmakers on the Senate Appropriations Committee last month.

Yet the administration now finds itself forced to consider such piecemeal proposals. Republicans hemmed in Biden’s $106 billion foreign aid request until Democrats made concessions on the border. There’s little talk of comprehensive overhauls lately and no hint of any legalization of undocumented immigrants.

And until Biden gives more forceful direction to Democrats, Republicans don’t see the border talks concluding with them cutting a deal with Mayorkas, anyway.

“I’m told that he’s trying to help. He’s very knowledgeable. But he doesn’t have any authority,” said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.). “We’re not going to reach any kind of agreement until the president tells us what, if anything, he’s willing to do to secure the border.”

Jordain Carney contributed to this report.

House Republicans may have found a way to salvage their flailing prospects in a crucial swing seat.

A heavy last-ditch recruitment effort from House Republican leaders pushed Ohio state Rep. Derek Merrin to jump into a chaotic primary for a Toledo-based district just before the state’s Wednesday filing deadline. The GOP was left reeling last week when their preferred candidate, Craig Riedel, was caught on tape bashing former President Donald Trump, setting off a mad dash to find a new recruit to beat veteran Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur.

But the plan is risky. The GOP is worried about a repeat of last year, when J.R. Majewski won the primary but lost to Kaptur. Riedel is remaining in the race, raising the real risk that he and Merrin split the anti-Majewski vote, opening up a path for him to take the nomination again.

Republicans had been banking on Riedel to block Majewski in the March primary. Majewski lost the race by 13 points last cycle after a news report indicated he misrepresented his military service in Afghanistan, and top Republicans believe Majewski would lose again to the incumbent.

Controversial recruits very likely cost House Republicans from winning a bigger majority in 2022, and they are determined not to let that happen again in 2024. Kaptur is one of just five Democrats in a district that Trump won in 2020, and Republicans consider her extremely vulnerable. But the audio leak left them worried about Riedel’s ability to win a primary.

So top House Republicans launched a behind-the-scenes campaign to woo Merrin, a mayor-turned-state legislator who nearly became speaker of the Ohio House earlier this year. The Toledo Blade first reported Merrin’s entrance into the race Wednesday.

Speaker Mike Johnson called Merrin to urge him to run, according to two people familiar with the conversation. National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) and Dan Conston, the president of the Johnson-aligned Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC, also encouraged him. The general pitch: This is one of the most winnable seats in the country if we can stop Majewski from winning the primary.

Their efforts paid off Wednesday. But the battle is just beginning.

Riedel will stay in the race, according to his campaign, and the possibility that Majewski could win the primary with a plurality isn’t just hypothetical: It’s precisely what happened in 2022, when Riedel and a third candidate similarly tried to block Majewski from the nomination but ended up splitting the vote instead.

“We’re very confident we are going to win the primary,” said Mark Harris, a spokesperson for Riedel. “The more they encourage other people to run, the beneficiary of that is likely to be Majewski.”

Harris said no one from House leadership or the House GOP campaign arm asked Riedel to get out of the race.

Riedel had more than $500,000 banked by the end of September for the primary, and he’s already gone negative. Last week, he launched a TV ad in West Palm Beach — almost certainly aimed at trying to earn a Trump endorsement — accusing Majewski of calling the former president “an idiot” in a private message.

But Merrin is likely to garner the support of party leaders in D.C. who can funnel money and support his bid. The Congressional Leadership Fund, the largest House GOP super PAC, has identified the district as one of its top targets and is prepared to play in GOP primaries in key swing seats. Now Merrin will have to move quickly to fundraise and get a campaign off the ground.

Merrin’s state legislative district, to which he was appointed in 2016, overlaps with some of the congressional district, so he already knows some of the voters. His profile rose last year when the state House GOP chose him as their nominee for speaker, though he was denied the post when Democrats joined with some Republican members to elect a different leader. Merrin is term-limited in the state House and cannot seek reelection in 2024.

Kaptur, the Democratic incumbent, was first elected in 1982. Her seat became much more competitive during the decennial redistricting.

Olivia Beavers contributed to this report.

Chuck Schumer sees a major threat to the fate of any future deal to pair stricter border policy with billions of dollars in foreign aid: Donald Trump.

The Senate majority leader made clear in a Wednesday interview with POLITICO that he’s counting on the ideological middle of the GOP to save President Joe Biden’s national security spending package — not just from conservative pressures, but from Trump’s scorn. Schumer said he expects roughly five Senate Republicans to vote for a deal no matter what, 15 to vote against it no matter what, and that the rest could all be swayed by Trump as the presidential primary formally kicks off next month.

“He is a huge political force in that party,” Schumer said in an interview with POLITICO Wednesday. “And the question is … will they do the right thing, even though they know that Donald Trump will in a nasty, vicious way, attack them?”

Just weeks away from the GOP’s Iowa caucus — which Trump leads by double-digit margins — lawmakers are bracing for the former president to wade into their business much more often, seeking to sway the party further in his direction. With that comes the threat of Trump actively trying to tank a potential agreement to pair border changes with foreign aid as negotiations slide into the New Year.

A number of Senate conservatives are already in lockstep with Trump in opposing further aid to Ukraine. Lawmakers are also bracing for House conservatives to demand more from a final deal than Democrats are willing to concede; if Trump agrees, he could bolster their cause.

“Their broad middle has a dilemma. They know it’s the right thing to do, to [pass aid for] Ukraine. And they know we have to do something on border. And we’re willing to meet them a decent part of the way,” Schumer said. “But they also have the specter of Donald Trump.”

To be sure, Senate Democrats are also at risk of losing a few from their own party on the package. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) voted against advancing the bill earlier this month, citing concerns over the lack of conditions on aid to Israel. A number of other Democrats are upset that border policy changes are on the table at all.

The latest from the border talks: Schumer said he gave a pep talk to border negotiators on Wednesday morning as they spent one more day in the Capitol together. At the moment, despite progress, “no agreement has been made,” he added. “There hasn’t been a handshake on anything.”

“It will not be that we’re unwilling to move on border — we are,” Schumer said. “The Republicans are realizing that.”

In between meetings, both Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) gave a similar prognosis.

“There will be some individuals who won’t be able or won’t be willing to support this package, and that’s okay,” Sinema said.

A Trump-backed candidate has an early lead in a crowded primary featuring a familiar cast of characters for a deep-red Arizona House seat.

An internal poll, first shared with POLITICO, showed Republican Abe Hamadeh, an unsuccessful 2022 candidate for Arizona attorney general, with a double-digit lead over his closest primary opponent in the race to succeed retiring Republican Rep. Debbie Lesko in Arizona’s 8th District.

The poll, conducted by National Public Affairs — a firm run by former Trump aides — shows Hamadeh with 37 percent of support from likely Republican primary voters. He’s followed by Blake Masters, who lost in last year’s high-profile race against Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly, with 14 percent.

The other candidates registered in the single digits. That includes Lesko-endorsed state House Speaker Ben Toma, who has 7 percent. Former Rep. Trent Franks, who resigned from Congress after female staffers said he approached them about being a surrogate for him and his wife, has 6 percent. State Sen. Anthony Kern comes in at 3 percent.

About one-third of respondents were undecided.

It is still early in the race, and it’s possible the field shifts. Arizona’s filing deadline is in April, and the primary is in August.

A handful of candidates, including Hamadeh, Masters and Kern, have amplified false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump. Hamadeh scored Trump’s endorsement earlier this month and is hoping it separates him from the rest of the field.

The poll says 58 percent of respondents would definitely or somewhat support Hamadeh, knowing that he was endorsed by Trump. Fifty-four percent of respondents say the same knowing he was endorsed by Kari Lake, a prominent Trump ally and election denier who is running for Senate next year. The district voted for Trump by double digits in 2020.

Trump had a mixed bag when it came to endorsement victories in last year’s competitive races. The former president endorsed Masters and Hamadeh in their unsuccessful races.Hamadeh lost the race for attorney general in 2022 by just over 200 votes, making it one of the closest elections in state history. Hamadeh challenged it in court for months — a legal battle that is still ongoing.

The survey includes 418 likely Republican primary voters, and was conducted Dec. 16-17 via landline phone calls and text messages directing respondents to complete a web survey. The margin of error is +/- 4.8 percentage points.

Sen. Josh Hawley plans to continue holding two administration nominees — both of whom are former staffers to Mitch McConnell — leaving an anticipated year-end nominations package in limbo.

The Missouri Republican stated his intentions in a letter to the minority leader on Wednesday, as McConnell had helped negotiate the package with the White House. It’s expected to include a number of White-House-picked nominees in exchange for a handful of more conservative nominees favored by Senate Republican leadership.

Hawley has singled out Andrew Ferguson’s nomination to the Federal Trade Commission commissioner and Todd Inman’s nomination to the National Transportation Safety Board as his points of concern.

“Two of the nominees you have sought to include in this package need more time for careful evaluation by our own Conference, especially by non-Committee members,” Hawley wrote to McConnell. “If Republicans are planning to install dozens of Biden nominees for positions across the federal government — without a vote — in exchange for just a handful of our own selections, I want to be sure that we get our nominees right.”

Hawley has also cited policy concerns as part of his holds. In his letter, Hawley insisted he’d want to hear more from both of the nominees on issues including big tech, rail safety and autonomous vehicles.

Worth noting: Hawley has not been present at votes this week, as many Republican senators skipped the unexpected additional days of session. It’s unclear to what extent Senate Democratic leadership will tackle the package on the floor before the Senate closes for business this week. Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer has said he plans to finish all Senate business by Wednesday.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) wants Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from considering the case of United States v. Trump, citing the efforts of Thomas’ wife Virginia to challenge the 2020 election.

Blumenthal sent a letter Wednesday urging Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to “take appropriate steps to ensure that Justice Clarence Thomas recuses himself” from the case, which is centered on Trump’s role in the Capitol attack of Jan. 6, 2021. That case is on a fast track for consideration by the highest court and could significantly affect Special Counsel Jack Smith’s handling of the charges his office has filed against former President Donald Trump.

Blumenthal cites Thomas’ previous recusal from the case Eastman v. Thompson back in October, due to Virginia Thomas’ correspondence with John Eastman about overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election. Thomas had not recused himself from previous Jan. 6-related cases, but did in the Eastman case.

“The same is true in United States v. Trump. Mrs. Thomas’s close interactions with senior Trump administration officials about overturning the 2020 election results — the very subject of the litigation — certainly creates circumstances where Justice Thomas’s ‘impartiality might reasonably be questioned,’” Blumenthal wrote.

Senators cleared nearly a dozen long-stalled four-star military positions late on Tuesday evening as lawmakers left for the year without action on international aid or border security policy.

In addition, the chamber cleared a short-term extension of the Federal Aviation Administration’s authorization by voice vote after Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) dropped his hold, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk.

“We have no more votes until we return in January,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the floor late Tuesday. “We are going to be in session [Wednesday] to do housekeeping business, but there are no more votes scheduled” until 2024.

What about those talks? Senators left without legislative text or a detailed framework for a deal that would pair border security policy changes with foreign aid, but Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a rare joint statement touting “encouraging progress” in the talks and vowing action “early in the new year.”

“Challenging issues remain, but we are committed to addressing needs at the southern border and to helping allies and partners confront serious threats in Israel, Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific,” the statement read. “The Senate will not let these national security challenges go unanswered.”

One of the lead negotiators, Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), told reporters on Tuesday evening he was “going to be here a while” and that lawmakers would keep talking via Zoom and video calls over the holiday period.

“We’ll keep working until we’re done,” he said.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), another lead negotiator on the border-Ukraine deal, indicated the group planned to meet at some point Wednesday and said “I’m talking to Chuck Schumer all the time these days” about the status of the talks.

As for this year’s business: The movement on the military nominations, long-held by Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), comes even as the senator from Alabama gained nothing in return.

In addition, the chamber confirmed former federal prosecutor John Russell to serve on the U.S. District Court for Northern Oklahoma by voice vote, Tuesday’s second confirmation to an Oklahoma judicial seat.

Jordain Carney contributed.