Tag

Slider

Browsing

House GOP leaders are discussing a floor vote this week to condemn Vice President Kamala Harris over her handling of the border, according to three Republicans with knowledge of the talks who were granted anonymity to speak frankly about internal discussions.

While the resolution led by House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) isn’t guaranteed to come to the House floor, members were told it was a possibility during a closed-door Republican leadership meeting on Monday night. The decision ultimately rests with Speaker Mike Johnson.

Republicans plan to hammer Harris on the border until Election Day, with the party immediately looking for ways to ding the vice president after Biden’s bombshell drop-out announcement on Sunday.

Stefanik quickly announced the resolution after Biden’s announcement and subsequent support of Harris — marking one of the first legislative steps House Republicans are considering after the seismic shift in Democratic politics.

“I am introducing a resolution condemning Kamala Harris’ role as Joe Biden’s ‘Border czar’ leading to the most catastrophic open border crisis in history,” Stefanik wrote on X on Sunday.

During a private GOP leadership meeting Monday night, the message to members was that they were looking at a Thursday vote on the resolution, according to the third person familiar with the matter. Still, the timing is fluid.

Republicans will need near unity to get the resolution through the House — a frequent challenge for their slim majority. But it is likely to have a better shot than other anti-Biden and anti-Harris options floated by House conservatives, including passing a resolution calling for the 25th Amendment to be invoked against Biden or trying to impeach either of them.

Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle utterly failed Monday to reassure lawmakers that she was still the best person for the job after the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, instead prompting members from both parties to call for her resignation in real time.

During the nearly five-hour long hearing in front of the Oversight Committee, members of the typically polarized committee united in questioning how Cheatle could remain on the job and lambasted her for evading inquiries — on everything from the failures that preceded the Trump rally shooting to general questions about the impact of gun violence. It was a particularly rare note of agreement for a panel that has openly and bitterly fought over a broad impeachment investigation into President Joe Biden, and a bad sign for Cheatle’s hopes of hanging on.

“This committee is not known for … its model of bipartisanship, but I think today we came together unanimously in our disappointment in your lack of answers,” Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) told Cheatle.

Cheatle’s position seemed to deteriorate as the hearing went on and the number of lawmakers piling on her for non-answers and shrugs began to climb.

Democrats were equally frustrated. Progressive Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) told Cheatle that she didn’t believe “any of our concerns have been addressed today, and what little we’ve learned has not inspired much confidence.” And in a potential precursor of more calls to come, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the panel, and a handful of other Democrats joined widespread GOP calls for Cheatle to resign. Both Comer and Raskin sent a letter to Cheatle officially demanding that she step aside after the hearing concluded.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), one of the Democrats who called on her to resign, compared Cheatle’s performance on Monday to an unrelated hearing earlier this year with three university presidents, two of whom subsequently resigned.

“That’s how this is going for you. This is where this is headed,” he said, saying that he supports Cheatle resigning or being fired.

Republicans and Democrats repeatedly expressed a shared sense of outrage that the world’s premier law enforcement agency could allow a 20-year-old to get a clear shot at the former president.

“You’re not doing well, as Mr. Moskowitz informed you,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) added.

Cheatle acknowledged that the assassination attempt was the “most significant operational failure” for the agency in decades. But she followed that admission with a series of evasive answers about the details of what went wrong, repeatedly citing the ongoing review or deferring to the FBI, which is also leading an investigation.

But that caveat bought her little goodwill with members of the committee. Instead, they repeatedly pressed her to give them answers on details, including how the gunman was able to get on a roof roughly 150 yards away from Trump, why Trump was allowed onto the stage and what actions the Secret Service has taken since the shooting.

“This is not just a single shooting, this is about national security and the security of our democracy,” said Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.). “It’s not just one operational failure. This is about: Are our public officials safe?”

“The answers that we’ve received here in this hearing today are completely unsatisfactory,” Stansbury added.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), in remarks that sparked pushback from Democrats, told Cheatle that she was “full of shit today.” Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a member of the Oversight Committee, added that it looked like she wouldn’t “answer some pretty basic questions.”

Cheatle did delve into some of the circumstances surrounding the Saturday shooting. She told lawmakers that, while she didn’t have a specific number, she believed “there was some sort of communication” about a suspicious individual to the Secret Service between two and five times. She also told lawmakers that the gunman’s vehicle was outside of the security perimeter and that the Secret Service didn’t know the gunman had a weapon when they allowed Trump to walk out onto the stage.

But that was only a fraction of the long list of questions that Cheatle faced on Monday.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) warned Cheatle that the absence of information had helped fuel conspiracy theories about the shooting and that members were “begging” for details to help rebut them.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) called on Cheatle to resign and repeatedly questioned why she wouldn’t. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) told her that it was “not acceptable” to wait weeks before giving more detailed answers about the security failures. And Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) asked Cheatle why she was answering “fewer” questions from lawmakers than she did during an ABC News interview that has sparked scrutiny.

“I don’t like the fact that the media has received far more answers than Congress has. … You should have come prepared here today,” Goldman told Cheatle.

Cheatle further rankled Democrats with her refusal to grapple with questions about the dangers guns pose to Secret Service protectees. They specifically pushed her on the threat posed by semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15 style rifle used in the Trump shooting.

“The ubiquity of guns, dangerous weapons in America like AR-15s, has that made your job — that is to say the mission of the Secret Service — easier or more difficult?” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) asked.

“I think the threat environment for protecting our Secret Service protectees is always difficult and that’s dynamic,” Cheatle responded, apparently wary of wading into an argument about regulating firearms. “I understand the Second Amendment rights of individuals.”

“I didn’t ask that question. I’m not questioning the Second Amendment,” Connolly shot back. “You’re not making my job easier in terms of assessing your qualifications for continuing on as director.”

Connolly, shortly after the hearing ended, called on Cheatle to resign.

Former U.S. Rep. George Santos on Friday lost a bid to get rid of part of the criminal case against him as he heads toward trial on charges that include defrauding campaign donors.

U.S. District Joanna Seybert turned down Santos’ request to dismiss charges of aggravated identity theft and theft of public money — in all, three of the 23 charges against the New York Republican.

Prosecutors and Santos’ lawyers declined to comment.

Prosecutors have accused Santos of a range of crimes — among them lying to Congress about his wealth, collecting unemployment benefits while actually working, and using campaign contributions to pay for such personal expenses as designer clothing. He pleaded not guilty to a revised indictment in October.

The aggravated identity theft charges pertain to allegations that Santos used campaign donors’ credit card information to make repeated contributions they hadn’t authorized. Prosecutors say he also tried to hide the true source of the money — and evade campaign contribution limits — by listing the donations as coming from some of his relatives and associates, without their assent.

Santos’ lawyers argued in court filings that the aggravated identity theft charges were invalid because, in the defense’s view, the allegations amounted only to overcharging credit card accounts that had been willingly provided to him.

Prosecutors disputed that argument. They said in filings that Santos hadn’t just “used” the credit card information but “abused it, with specific intent to defraud” in order to make his campaign coffers look fuller.

The theft of public funds charge relates to the alleged unemployment fraud.

Santos’ lawyers said the charge improperly combined multiple alleged criminal schemes and transactions. Courts have said in other cases that such combination isn’t allowed for various reasons, including the possibility that jurors could convict on the charge while believing a defendant guilty of only part of it.

Prosecutors in Santos’ case said the theft of public funds charge against him alleges “a single continuing scheme.”

The former Congress member is slated to go on trial in September in Central Islip, on New York’s Long Island.

In April, he dropped his longshot bid to return to Congress as an independent in New York’s 1st Congressional District, on Long Island.

The House is set to vote this week on establishing a bipartisan task force to investigate the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump.

The resolution would establish an 11-member panel — six Republicans and five Democrats. It’s currently teed up to get a vote under suspension, meaning a higher passage threshold that will require Democratic help.

The move to establish the task force, which was added to the House’s weekly schedule on Sunday night, comes as multiple congressional panels have already teed up probes into the shooting. But Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated he wants to use the task force to focus the House’s efforts. He is expected to release additional details Monday.

The resolution would also require the task force to make a final report on its findings and legislative proposals no later than Dec. 13.

Much of the early congressional ire has been focused on Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, who will appear before the House Oversight Committee starting at 10 a.m. on Monday.

Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) will tell Cheatle when she appears before his panel that it is his “firm belief” that she should resign, according to excerpts of his opening statement obtained by POLITICO.

“However — in complete defiance — Director Cheatle has maintained she will not tender her resignation. Therefore, she will answer questions today from members of this committee seeking to provide clarity to the American people about how these events were allowed to transpire,” Comer will say, according to the excerpts.

It’s not just Republicans who are calling for her resignation. Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) became the first House Democrat to call for Cheatle’s resignation over the weekend, saying that “evidence coming to light has shown unacceptable operational failures” and that he has “no confidence” in Secret Service leadership if she stays.

Cheatle, according to excerpts of her own opening statement, will tell lawmakers that she takes “full responsibility for any security lapse” and will cooperate with congressional oversight and other investigations.

“We must learn what happened and I will move heaven and earth to ensure an incident like July 13th does not happen again. Thinking about what we should have done differently is never far from my thoughts,” she will add.

In addition to the Oversight hearing, House Homeland Security Chair Mark Green (R-Tenn.) is leading a bipartisan visit to the site of Trump’s rally on Monday. FBI Director Christopher Wray will testify before the House Judiciary panel on Wednesday, and the House is also expected to get a classified briefing this week.

Green on Monday said that Cheatle “has rightfully admitted the near assassination of a former president was a failure. She even said the buck stops with her.”

“For the good of this country, Director Cheatle must resign immediately,” he added.

Immediately after Joe Biden dropped the bombshell that he was dropping out of the presidential race, congressional Republicans started to openly call for him to resign from the White House now.

Speaker Mike Johnson said in forcing Biden off the ballot that “the self-proclaimed ‘party of democracy’ has proven exactly the opposite” and called for Biden to resign immediately.”

“If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President. He must resign the office immediately. November 5 cannot arrive soon enough,” Johnson said in a statement.

Johnson argued that swapping Biden for Vice President Kamala Harris would do nothing to better their electoral prospects, calling her a “gleeful accomplice” for the administration’s policies.

“If Joe Biden can’t run for re-election, he is unable and unfit to serve as President of the United States. He must immediately resign,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), a member of House GOP leadership, posted on X.

GOP leadership in the House wasn’t alone.

“Doesn’t have the mental acuity or cognitive ability to run a political campaign but can serve for 6 more months as president? He should resign,” wrote Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.).

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who’s running to succeed Mitch McConnell as leader of the Senate Republican conference, echoed those calls in a statement.

“Let me be clear, if Joe Biden can’t run for re-election, he is not capable of serving as president for the next six months and needs to resign today,” Scott said. “While we welcome the news that one of America’s most destructive presidents will be denied a second term, it changes very little as to the stakes of this election.”

The head of the Senate GOP campaign arm, Montana’s Steve Daines, called on Biden to resign immediately.

“If Joe Biden is no longer capable of running for re-election, he is no longer capable of serving as President,” Daines said in a statement. “Being President is the hardest job in the world, and I no longer have confidence that Joe Biden can effectively execute his duties as Commander-in-Chief.”

Rep. Kevin Hern (R-Okla.), chair of the largest House GOP caucus — the Republican Study Committee — echoed those calls, as well. Similar calls came from lawmakers including Sen. Markwayne Mullin (Okla.) and Rep. Carlos Gimenez (Fla.).

“If Joe Biden is unfit to be the Democrat nominee for president, he’s unfit to be president for the rest of his term,” Hern said. “For the good of the country, Joe Biden should resign immediately.”

The calls for Biden to resign, though prevalent, were not universal among congressional Republicans.

“I respect President Biden’s decision to act in the best interest of the country by stepping aside in the 2024 presidential election,” centrist Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who has said she cannot vote for Trump, said in a post on X.

Sen. Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.) said on Sunday he believes it is time for President Joe Biden to withdraw from the 2024 race, after previously saying he supported him in the race.

“I came to the decision with a heavy heart that I think it’s time to pass the torch to a new generation,” Manchin said in an interview with host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union.” He also called on Biden to step down on ABC’s “This Week,” using very similar phrasing.

“He will go down with a legacy unlike many people, as one of the finest and truly a patriot American,” Manchin said on “This Week.” “So with that I come with a heavy heart to think the time has come for him to pass the torch to a new generation.”

Manchin’s call to withdraw comes after Democratic senators in swing states, such as Sens. Jon Tester of Montana and Sherrod Brown of Ohio, have made the same plea. He is now the fifth senator to call on Biden to not seek reelection.

The president has reiterated that he does not plan to leave the ticket.

“While the majority of the Democratic caucus and the diverse base of the party continues to stand with the President and his historic record of delivering for their communities, we’re clear-eyed that the urgency and stakes of beating Donald Trump means others feel differently. We all share the same goal: an America where everyone gets a fair shot and freedom and democracy are protected,” Biden campaign spokesperson Mia Ehrenberg said in a statement. “Unlike Republicans, we’re a party that accepts —and even celebrates — differing opinions, but in the end, we will absolutely come together to beat Donald Trump this November.”

Manchin, who was elected as a Democrat but became an independent on May 31, also supported an open primary process for Democrats as the next step if Biden were to step down. He did not name Vice President Kamala Harris, but said there is “a lot of talent on the bench,” and the former West Virginia governor said he is “partial to governors.”

“A governor can’t afford to be partial, they can’t afford to be partisan, strictly because that pothole or that bridges doesn’t have a D or an R on it,” Manchin said. “I’ve got two tremendous governors right next door to me, Andy Beshear in Kentucky and Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, who are operating with legislatures either evenly split or completely opposite of their party affiliation. They haven’t divided their state.”

He added, “This is what an open process would do. I think it would bring more people out in a process that could bring Democrats like me back.”

Manchin said he didn’t know what that open process would look like considering there are only three weeks until the Democratic National Convention, but that once they get to the convention, everything will change. He also ruled out a presidential run for himself, saying he would rather support a “new generation.”

“People keep talking about race and gender — it’s not about race and gender, it’s about positions, it’s about basically who we are,” Manchin said. “I left the Democrat Party because it’s not the Democratic Party that I grew up in, that I always knew.”

The independent senator, who has had his own disagreements with the president over the past four years, said he wants Biden to stay in the presidency through November.

He specifically said in five months Biden could “help heal this nation” and “bring the world together” — and that the president should be solely focused on that.

“That takes a full-time 24/7 president not being worried about where you got to go campaign, got to give a speech, got to go out, raise money,” Manchin said. “And I think his legacy will be one of the greatest legacies of any of our leaders.”

Manchin added that as someone who has been through statewide campaigns, it is challenging “to anybody physically, mentally, every way, shape and form.”

“Right now, the country and the world needs our President Joe Biden with a compassion he’s always had and the ability to bring people together, to use all of his forces and energy toward that,” Manchin said.

During a visit Monday to the site of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, lawmakers climbed onto the roof used to open fire on the rally and later expressed deep doubts about official explanations for why Secret Service agents weren’t stationed there.

Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle has said agents weren’t put on the roof because the slope made it unsafe. But House Homeland Security members said they walked around on the roof Monday without difficulty.

“I can tell you that, just looking at the site, immediately there are things that just hit you, and the fact that those things weren’t covered is unacceptable, completely unacceptable,” Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.) told reporters during the Butler, Pennsylvania, visit. “I was on that roof, the roof that the director said was really, really dangerous for Secret Service and other personnel to be on. I’m 70 years old. There’s nothing unsafe about that.”

Gimenez, a former SWAT team member, also posted a video on X that he recorded on the now-infamous roof.

“One thing’s for clear, it’s for sure: It’s way too close,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said after visiting the shooter’s vantage point. “You know, being up on the rooftop and looking at where the president was relative to the roof is so close for a sniper.”

McCaul also questioned why a counter-sniper team wasn’t stationed on a nearby water tower, which he said had a clear line of sight to where officials say Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, repeatedly fired an AR-15-style rifle, wounding Trump, killing one rallygoer and injuring several others.

With questions still swirling about why warnings to local police about the suspect were slow to reach Secret Service personnel, Homeland Security Chair Mark Green (R-Tenn.) said he learned Monday that local authorities were excluded from the Secret Service command posts for the July 13 rally, even though such officials had been granted that access at similar events in the past.

“Normally, the local law enforcement guys are allowed to sit in the Secret Service … control room,” Green said. “Today, the locals shared with us that they were not allowed to have anybody in there. So, that makes you want to dig a little further, right?”

Democratic members who joined in visiting the site of the Trump campaign rally in Butler expressed concern that campaigns had too much influence over the selection of event sites and appeared to be able to override security personnel despite complaints about logistical complexity.

“Who is in charge? Is it the Secret Service? Or is it the campaign?” asked Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.).

“I think there’s a lot of issues here that probably strongly suggested we never should have had the event here to start with,” added Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.). “That doesn’t excuse the failures of the Secret Service that day. I think we definitely want to make sure we investigate those and get to the bottom of what happened. … I looked at all of the roofs that were around and my count was around 12 or so. And I just thought, maybe this isn’t the best place to have done this.”

As Democrats at the House Oversight Committee hearing back in Washington joined Republicans in calling for Cheatle’s resignation, the Democratic members on the Monday visit to western Pennsylvania stopped short of doing that.

“We [are] not quite through with all of the gathering of information,” the top Democrat on the Homeland Security panel, Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, said when asked whether he’d join calls for Cheatle to step down or be fired. “But we are not reluctant once, we gather it to make decisions, but we want to make sure we have all the information.”

Top House Oversight Democrat Jamie Raskin told Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle that he believes she should resign, capping off an hourslong hearing into security failures surrounding the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.

“I don’t want to add to the director’s terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day, but I will be joining the chairman in calling for the resignation of the director, just because I think that this relationship is irretrievable at this point,” Raskin (D-Md.) said, referring to Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.).

“I think that the director has lost the confidence of Congress at a very urgent and tender moment in the history of the country,” Raskin continued.

Comer earlier in the hearing called for Cheatle’s resignation: “We are concerned the Secret Service lacks the proper management to keep protectees safe from bad actors,” Comer said, adding that under Cheatle’s leadership, “we question whether anyone is safe.”

As he wrapped up the hearing, Comer said that he and Raskin would also be sending a letter requesting Cheatle’s resignation “as a step toward accountability in what happened.”

Cheatle defended her decision to stay in her position during the hearing. But she’s faced fierce, and growing, bipartisan criticism during the hearing as lawmakers vented frustration over her inability to answer several questions because investigations are still ongoing.

House Republicans have pulled two government funding bills scheduled for a floor vote this week, signaling further peril for leadership’s doomed efforts to pass all 2025 spending measures before the August recess.

Republicans’ funding bill for the Agriculture Department and the FDA, in addition to the Financial Services spending bill, will not be considered on the floor as originally planned, according to three sources familiar with the whipping problems.

Both measures failed to clear the floor last summer, thanks to politically unpalatable funding levels and conservative policy riders, including language blocking abortion and contraceptive protections. Those same issues are ensnaring GOP leaders yet again, despite an effort to dial back on some of the more controversial provisions that previously stymied floor passage.

GOP leaders still plan to put their Energy-Water and Interior-Environment funding bills on the floor in the coming days, and the House Rules Committee is expected to meet Monday afternoon on all four funding bills. But the prospects for passing the Agriculture-FDA and Financial Services bills next week, let alone Republicans’ remaining fiscal 2025 measures, are grim and looking increasingly unlikely.

There are three other bills with arguably even worse odds for floor passage, tentatively slated for floor action next week: Labor-HHS-Education, Commerce-Justice-Science and Transportation-HUD.

Rumors are already flying that GOP leaders might abandon their appropriations push altogether, leaving at the end of this week for August recess rather than stick around to sustain more self-inflicted spending wounds.

Top Republican appropriators decided last month to leave out controversial language blocking access to abortion pills in the funding measure that covers the FDA, after that language prompted opposition last year from several swing-district Republicans. The policy would have effectively overturned the FDA’s decision in early 2023 that allows mifepristone abortion pills to be sold at retail pharmacies and delivered by mail.

House GOP leaders have also heard conflicting demands over the contents of their financial services spending measure, which would block a D.C. law that prevents employers from discriminating against workers who seek contraception or family planning services.

That financial services measure divides House Republicans on cannabis policy as well — GOP appropriators nixed language that would have made it easier for financial institutions to serve certain cannabis businesses.

The decision to yank the Agriculture-FDA and Financial Services spending bills from the floor comes after the surprise failure of Republicans’ $7 billion Legislative Branch funding measure earlier this month.

That bill, which is the smallest out of a dozen annual appropriations bills, should’ve been an easy win for GOP leaders. But conservative consternation over a long-standing freeze on a cost-of-living pay raise for members of Congress, in addition to heightened funding levels, ultimately tanked the bill, with 10 Republicans joining Democrats to defeat the measure on the floor.

Meredith Lee Hill, Sarah Ferris and Jordain Carney contributed to this report.

Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle told lawmakers on Monday that the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump was the agency’s “most significant operational failure” in decades, while also broadly laying out how it prepared for the rally.

Cheatle testified before the House Oversight Committee — her first public appearance before Congress since the July 13 shooting, where she is expected to face hours of fierce bipartisan criticism from a panel usually known for partisan disagreements.

Cheatle, in her opening statement to the committee, appeared to try to clean up previous remarks from public interviews since the shooting, telling the panel none of her previous comments “should be interpreted to place blame for this failure on our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners who supported the Secret Service” in Butler, Pennsylvania.

She also indirectly touched on one area she is all but guaranteed to get questions on: If the Secret Service denied requests to beef up Trump’s security detail. She offered broad details, which she is sure to get pressed on further, about how the event was planned.

“The level of security provided for the former president increased well before the campaign and has been steadily increasing as threats evolve,” Cheatle told lawmakers.

The Washington Post reported over the weekend that officials at the Secret Service turned down requests from Trump’s security detail for more resources and personnel in the two years leading up to the Pennsylvania shooting. Cheatle, during early questions from Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), said “no assets [were] denied for that event.”

“The assets that were requested for that day were given,” she said.

Cheatle on Monday also said that the Secret Service started planning for Trump’s rally shortly after it was announced, including “a full assessment of the Butler Farm Show Grounds to identify security vulnerabilities.” She added that after the shooting she also boosted Trump’s protective resources.

Cheatle’s acknowledgment of Secret Service failures likely won’t quash the bipartisan criticism she will face for hours. Underscoring the high-profile nature of the hearing, Speaker Mike Johnson was in the room as the hearing kicked off.

Comer kicked off the hearing telling Cheatle that she should resign.

“We are concerned the Secret Service lacks the proper management to keep protectees safe from bad actors,” Comer said, adding that under Cheatle’s leadership, “we question whether anyone is safe.”

Raskin said that the panel would be asking “hard questions” of Cheatle, while also calling the shooting a “double failure” and using his opening statement to make a broader push for new gun laws.