Tag

Featured

Browsing

Sen. James Lankford, the lead GOP negotiator on a border-foreign aid package, said there won’t be a vote on the bipartisan proposal this week as senators work to iron out final sticking points.

Instead, Lankford (R-Okla.) said he’s “very hopeful” that he, Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) can release the text of the deal they have been negotiating sometime this week.

“It could be later on this week if all the things continue to come together,” Lankford said. But, he added, there “certainly” wouldn’t be a vote this week.

Murphy added that negotiators are working “as fast as we can. … [But] there’s still some issues left to solve.”

“There is no reason for us to wait weeks to get this bill on the floor. And so I am hopeful that our Republican colleagues will work with us to wrap up the supplemental — both the policy changes and the funding necessary to effectuate the policy changes — in the next few days so that we can answer the call for Ukraine,” Murphy said.

Senate Republicans spent most of their closed-door lunch discussing the negotiations, with some airing frustrations about the length of the talks and concerns that leadership could force a quick vote. Some conservatives are also pitching breaking up the components of the border-foreign aid deal into individual pieces that would each get their own vote.

“Several points of view came out … at decibel levels a little higher than normal,” said Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.).

Braun summed up the frustration during the lunch meeting: “It’s taken so long, and now there’s talk about maybe getting something to the floor and voting on it in a day or two. I think that would cause a real uproar.”

Lankford, asked about some of the feedback from his colleagues, added that “everybody wants to read it. … Everybody wants to be able to go through it..”

“They’re all frustrated they’re not in the room,” he said.

Senators had hoped to be ready to vote on a deal as soon as this week — but there were already signs that it was looking increasingly unlikely.

“There are a few items still outstanding. So … we’re not on a glide path to get this done this week,” Senate GOP Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters earlier Tuesday.

But negotiators and leadership signaled Tuesday that they still believe they are close to a deal. Even if they can get something through the Senate, it could still face a heavy lift in the House, where a growing number of conservatives are wary of additional Ukraine aid.

“We will give members time to read the text before we vote, that’s for sure. And as for amendments and how to deal with the floor, Leader [Mitch] McConnell and I will have to work that out once we’ve come to an agreement,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters.

North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer said he won’t run to replace Gov. Doug Burgum after the incumbent governor announced Monday he wouldn’t pursue a third term.

“I’m not running for governor,” he told POLITICO in an interview, calling it a “logical question” following Burgum’s announcement.

Cramer (R-N.D.), who came to the Senate in 2018 and is up for reelection in 2024, said he wants to continue to accumulate seniority in a second term in office.

“In the second six-year term, you probably like quadruple your influence,” he said. “Seniority is probably more important.”

Burgum said he wouldn’t seek reelection to the highest office in Bismarck shortly after dropping his presidential bid and endorsing former President Donald Trump.

The state’s other GOP senator, John Hoeven, previously served for ten years as governor.

Republicans once slammed John Fetterman as a “radical socialist” who was “too dangerous” to get elected.

These days, they seem to like him just fine.

Now that Fetterman is touting ironclad support for Israel and calling for stricter border policies, his Senate colleagues across the aisle describe him as “independent” and “sticking to his guns.” Interviews with nearly a dozen GOP senators revealed a growing warmth toward Fetterman that goes beyond delight at seeing how much his new identity has irked progressives.

It seems Republicans are now more open to partnering with Fetterman on policy because of his recent party-bucking.

“It certainly makes it more appealing to want to work with him on things if you see this independent streak,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said of Fetterman’s recent remarks.

No grand partnerships have sprung up on legislation just yet. But the mere fact that Republicans view him in those terms is a statement on Fetterman’s political evolution.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who frustrated many in his own party with his months-long blockade of military promotions, lauded Fetterman as someone who “speaks his own mind” and “doesn’t follow the party line.” Tuberville added that “it’s easier to talk, carry on a conversation,” with a political opponent who’s “open-minded.”

It’s unclear whether Fetterman can, or even wants to, leverage his new niche as a Democrat who Republicans can tolerate — possibly even like — into a productive role as a Senate dealmaker. It’s a disappearing typecast: Sens. Mitt Romney‘s (R-Utah) and Joe Manchin‘s (D-W.Va.) imminent retirements are hollowing out the chamber’s small but influential bloc of aisle-crossing negotiators, and that void could grow if Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) also passes on reelection.

But Fetterman’s voting record remains staunchly in line with the rest of his party. In a brief interview for this story, the first-term senator didn’t express explicit interest in taking on more partnerships with the GOP — but he didn’t rule it out, either. Fetterman even argued that Republicans who have personally praised his recent remarks on the border and Israel shouldn’t be so shocked.

“Outside of Philadelphia, they have these gigantic billboards, where it was like, ‘Fetterman = open border’ … it just turns out that it’s all bullshit,” Fetterman said in an interview, referring to Republicans’ 2022 campaign attacks on him. “And I would have thought that professionals would have realized that most of it is all bullshit.”

Just over a year ago, Senate Republicans were working hard to brand Fetterman as a younger version of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — an actual democratic socialist — who was unfit for office. Over the past three months, however, Fetterman showed a side of his ideology that seemed to genuinely startle his GOP colleagues.

Not only did he vocally defend Israel in its war against Hamas, as Sanders and other liberal leaders suggested curbs on U.S. aid, Fetterman defended bipartisan talks on stricter border policies that slow the flow of migrants into the U.S. And he bucked his own leadership by calling for the expulsion of a fellow Democrat, indicted New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez.

“He’s not in lockstep with the progressives in his party … I don’t know if he’s had an epiphany or exactly what’s going on, but [it’s] obviously gotten a lot of people’s attention,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

In fact, Fetterman has repeatedly stressed he is not a progressive. Yet core elements of his political persona remain very much in line with the left: He wants to abolish the filibuster; he wants universal health care, though he’s not embraced Sanders’ flagship “Medicare for all” slogan; he still dons hoodies in the staid Senate, reveling in the establishment’s alarm at his casual garb.

On the campaign trail, Fetterman even quipped that he might let down centrist-leaning “Joe Manchin Democrats,” nudging members of his party to “vote like Democrats.” When it comes to votes during his first year in office, he’s stayed true to that watchword — rarely straying from the party line.

Taking the man as a whole, many Senate Republicans are ready to take a new look at Fetterman.

“I know from politics, my own race, that not everything people say about you is actually true,” said Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio), who added that Fetterman has said some “smart” things over the past few months, particularly about the border. The two first-term senators have worked together on rail safety legislation that Vance still hopes will pass this year.

Fetterman has also cosponsored several agriculture-focused bills alongside Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), who credited the Pennsylvanian for “bucking Biden and everybody else” on immigration. The administration has also been open to bipartisan border talks.

Even off the Hill, Fetterman has won praise from Republicans, including two current GOP Senate candidates. Former Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Mich.), who’s seeking a comeback in the upper chamber, has said he likes Fetterman. Dave McCormick, who’s hoping to take on Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) next fall, said he’s been “surprised” by Fetterman and that he thinks the Democrat has “moral clarity” on the border and Israel.

Still, Fetterman’s new GOP fans are also curbing their enthusiasm for him. Cramer argued that Fetterman leans liberal on most issues, saying that his “views are largely left, in some cases very left.” Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said he appreciated Fetterman “sticking to his guns” on the border and Israel but pushed back on any suggestion that the Democrat is on an all-out independent streak.

Kennedy also indicated that Republicans shouldn’t let Fetterman’s metamorphosis matter too much.

“Just because somebody agrees or disagrees with you doesn’t mean you ought to like or dislike them,” he said. “You should respect differences of opinion.”

Bipartisan border talks are “largely done” and have advanced to the Senate Appropriations Committee — signaling talks are entering a potential final phase — according to lead Democratic negotiator Sen. Chris Murphy.

“Our work is largely done,” Murphy (D-Conn.) said. “The conversation has really moved over to Appropriations. So, there’s no reason why we couldn’t begin consideration this week.”

Murphy said bill text is not yet finalized, but noted “we need to give people the ability to read and understand” the deal before a vote. He added that both caucuses have already been briefed “on the outlines of what we have agreed upon.” Senators will want time to review the bill and potentially propose amendments, but the process for that will ultimately be up to leadership.

The language from Murphy is among the most optimistic negotiators have used in weeks — with Murphy and fellow negotiators Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) looking to find some degree of compromise on the complex issue of immigration. Republicans conditioned further aid to Ukraine on the inclusion of border policy changes as part of the White House $106 billion national security supplemental request.

Presidential parole authority has been the main lingering issue in talks, with Democrats arguing parole is a key tool for managing migration at the southern border. Asked if talks moving on to the Senate Appropriations Committee signals that parole issues have been worked out between negotiators, Murphy reemphasized that “the work now” is in Appropriations.

Senate leadership last week signaled interest in moving the supplemental this week — meaning there’s at least some degree of expectation that the border talks will be wrapped up soon.

But to be sure, the talks have already blown past multiple deadlines, and the spending component of the border will still be challenging because of ties to any potential policy changes. Negotiators have considered a wide array of potential changes as part of the talks, including restricting asylum and parole, expanding expulsion authority and implementing a cap on daily entries.

Burgess Everett contributed to this report.

Senate Republicans won’t get the free-for-all GOP presidential primary they predicted (or hoped for). Some still aren’t ready for it to be over.

As the primary boils down to former President Donald Trump against former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, some still-on-the-fence Republicans said Monday that Haley should keep going and give the party a choice against Trump. Haley has no official Senate endorsements while Trump has 27 — more than half the conference — but that doesn’t mean she lacks fans.

“She’s great … and I’m really proud of her. I think it’s good to have that discussion and highlight the different candidates. So, I’d love to see her stay in,” said Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), the No. 4 GOP leader, who is officially neutral even after Trump won her state’s caucus.

Haley’s showing in New Hampshire’s Tuesday primary will cast a shadow the following weeks leading up to South Carolina, with one question on most Republican minds: Is there any appetite for a one-on-one primary battle with Trump, or is the whole thing over already? There are 22 unaffiliated GOP senators, ranging from Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to rank-and-file members. If Haley is crushed, some of them will are likely to swing around to Trump quickly.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she hopes Haley will stay in the race, “but obviously it’s going to depend on what the margin is tomorrow … I hope she does very well.” Collins, who voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial, stayed neutral in the 2024 primary because she had many friends in the race at the outset.

“They’ve got to look at the data and look at the path and make the decision that’s right for her,” unaligned Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said of Haley. “Statistically, it’s a steep hill. I have tremendous respect for Nikki. She’d make a good president.”

A couple other senators, Minority Whip John Thune of South Dakota and Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer simply said they needed to see what happens in New Hampshire before commenting. Another neutral senator said it’s pretty much over either way.

“The handwriting is on the wall,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who said he will support the eventual GOP nominee. “The sooner we can unify behind a single candidate the better our chances of beating President Biden, which I think is the ultimate objective.”

Even some of those who desperately want to beat Trump aren’t seeing much of a path. Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said that Haley has “run a very effective campaign, but what was once a long shot has become a very long shot.”

And what about an endorsement from New Hampshire’s 2012 primary winner? “I’m not going to curse her with that pronouncement,” Romney said. “But I won’t be supporting President Trump.”

Rep. Nancy Mace on Monday endorsed former President Donald Trump’s bid to return to the White House, the latest chapter in her series of conflicting statements about the former president.

“I don’t see eye to eye perfectly with any candidate. And until now I’ve stayed out of it. But the time has come to unite behind our nominee,” she said in a post on X. “To be honest, it’s been a complete shit show since he left the White House.”

That’s a marked difference from how the South Carolina Republican spoke about Trump after the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, though her stance had clearly started to soften in the years since. Here’s a timeline of Mace’s evolving relationship with the former president:

Jan. 7, 2021, after the attack on the Capitol: Mace took to television to say of Trump: “everything that he’s worked for … all of that — his entire legacy — was wiped out yesterday. We’ve got to start over.”

Jan. 13, 2021: Mace votes to acquit Trump for the events of Jan. 6 but says in a floor speech: “I believe we need to hold the president accountable. I hold him accountable for the events that transpired for the attack on our Capitol.”

Jan. 17, 2021 on NBC’s “Meet the Press”: “We need to rebuild the Republican Party. We need to rebuild our country. And I am counting on my colleagues to join us, to be that new voice for the Republican Party to lead us out of the crisis going forward because our country is counting on us.”

Feb. 9, 2022: Trump endorses Mace’s primary rival, Katie Arrington, in the GOP primary for her House seat. In a statement, he calls Mace “an absolutely terrible candidate” who has been “disloyal” to Republicans.

Feb. 10, 2022: Mace appears in front of Trump Tower in New York to seek his support, despite him endorsing her rival just the day before. “I was one of his earliest supporters,” she said.

June 14, 2022: Mace defeats Arrington for the Republican nomination despite Trump’s endorsement of her rival. She goes on to win another term in November.

June 11, 2023: Mace hit the Biden Justice Department for indicting Trump over his handling of classified documents, saying “whether you agree with Donald Trump politically or not, most of America sees this for what it is, as weaponizing the executive branch to take out your political enemies.”

June 21, 2023: Mace says of her past relationship with Trump: “I’m willing to bury the hatchet to save the country, and I know President Trump is too.”

October 2023: Mace prompts significant GOP blowback after she votes with seven other Republicans to oust then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy from his post, a surprise defection.

January 22, 2024: The South Carolina Republican endorses the former president just a day ahead of the New Hampshire primary.

Senate Republicans have a solid shot in the battle for Senate control this year after landing some of their top recruits and nabbing an almost certain pickup. Still, several critical factors could hurt their bid to take back power.

The biggest drama is out West, where independent Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and Republican Montana Rep. Matt Rosendale are mulling their futures. Their decisions will have crucial implications across the entire map, where Republicans either need to net two seats or win the presidency and gain just one.

Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-W.Va.) retirement has GOP senators confident they’ve got one seat locked down. Winning another could depend heavily on Sinema, Rosendale and a slew of other unknowns.

If Sinema runs for a second term, she would create an unpredictable three-way race as an underdog independent attempting to peel voters from Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Republican Kari Lake, her party’s presumptive nominee. Rosendale, meanwhile, would create a massive headache for Republicans if he follows through on months of build-up and challenges Tim Sheehy for the GOP nomination in Montana, which is one of the party’s top two Senate targets.

There’s more in flux: Republicans are closely watching whether former President Donald Trump will weigh in on crucial contested primaries in several purple states. And there are still big questions about whether last-minute recruits will help expand the map beyond Ohio, Montana and a half-dozen battlegrounds. Oh, yeah, and the most well-known liberal senator in the country might retire — or serve deep into his 80s.

Here’s what POLITICO is watching as the battle for the Senate heads into a defining stretch:

Big Sky Republican divides

Rosendale’s decision is probably the most important to the Senate map. It would create a GOP primary that could force the national party to spend tens of millions of dollars and divide a state party that needs to throw a perfect game to beat incumbent Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.).

Tester beat Rosendale in 2018 despite support from Trump and Republicans of all stripes. Since then, Rosendale won a House seat and developed a reputation as a notorious rabble-rouser, helping oust former Speaker Kevin McCarthy and now advocating hardline shutdown positions to get tough new border policies.

He’s signaled to Republicans for months he plans to run. And the party has made it absolutely clear they don’t want him in the Senate race.

“I hope he stays in the House and continues to develop seniority there,” said Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who runs the Senate GOP’s campaign arm.

That hasn’t dissuaded Rosendale. He has needled Sheehy by yoking him to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and suggested to colleagues that he’s going to get in the race. He’s continuing to campaign outside his district and is set to host campaign events with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

“Steve Daines has made it exceedingly clear that the Senate committee is supporting Tim Sheehy,” Rosendale said in a brief interview. “People across Montana still overwhelmingly would rather have someone who is an independent voice for them and not answering to Mitch McConnell.”

The filing deadline is March 11. Tester’s not making any bets, saying in a brief interview: “I can’t predict what the hell he’s going to do.”

Sinema’s choice

The Arizona senator ditched the Democratic Party more than a year ago and only solidified her independent status since then, pursuing a border and immigration agreement that could augment her legacy of bipartisan deal-cutting. Before that, she helped broker a gun safety deal, rejected changes to the filibuster and cut down some provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act.

And in her typical reserved style, well, she’s still not looking to talk about her reelection decision-making.

“I’m not thinking about that at all right now. You know what I am thinking [about]?” Sinema said in a brief interview. “The border.”

Sinema, who generally aligns with Democrats on key votes, has until April 8 to decide to run again — but in reality, she would need to start collecting signatures to make the ballot well before then. As an independent candidate, she will face more onerous signature requirements. And if she decides to run, the race would be challenging, to say the least. She consistently lags behind both Gallego and Lake in polls, though she has more than $10 million in her campaign coffers.

“There’s not a path that we can see for Kyrsten in that race,” Daines said. “It’s going to be Kyrsten’s decision, but I think it’s going to be a difficult path for her.”

Still, a Sinema reelection bid would create a chaotic and indecipherable race in a challenging state. It would undoubtedly affect the campaign strategies of both of her foes, even if she starts out in third place.

The Trump effect

Trump handpicked several of the Senate GOP’s candidates in 2022. It didn’t go well — Republicans blew winnable races in states like Arizona and Pennsylvania — but they swear it’ll be different this time.

Trump has backed several of the GOP’s preferred candidates this cycle and, as of now, Trump and Daines differ on only one race: Ohio, where the National Republican Senatorial Committee is neutral, and Trump has endorsed businessperson Bernie Moreno. Yet there’s plenty of opportunities for more mischief.

An endorsement from the former president could whittle down an unruly field in Michigan, where a slew of Senate contenders are vying for his support: Former Reps. Mike Rogers and Peter Meijer, former Detroit Police Chief James Craig and businessperson Sandy Pensler. And former Rep. Justin Amash, who became a libertarian after voting to impeach Trump, is mulling a run — as a Republican.

The jockeying for Trump’s favor has only grown more heated as he surges in the presidential primary. Pensler just released an ad cataloguing Rogers’ past anti-Trump comments.

“They know he’s going to be the candidate,” Rep. Jack Bergman (R-Mich.) said of Trump. The candidates “all want” his endorsement, he added, but “the question is: What’s the advantage to him to give it?”

There’s also a crowded primary in Nevada where Trump could weigh in, featuring his former ambassador to Iceland Jeffrey Gunter, hardline conservative Jim Marchant and NRSC-backed veteran Sam Brown. Plus there’s Montana, where Trump’s endorsement could become a key factor if Rosendale gets in — particularly after the lawmaker infamously snubbed Trump on the House floor.

The final recruits

Wisconsin is the preeminent battleground of modern day politics. So how the heck does Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) not have a real GOP challenger yet?

The two-term senator’s expecting one soon: Eric Hovde, a wealthy businessperson who ran for Senate in 2012. Hovde has been interviewing potential staff and consultants ahead of his likely run, according to a person familiar with his plans who was granted anonymity to speak candidly.

“Steve Daines … indicated [Hovde] was jumping and had their full support. So that’s what we’re planning” for, Baldwin said in an interview. Still, she said “there may well be” a more crowded primary.

Hovde’s launch would give the Senate GOP its final recruit in their critical battleground targets. But other strong candidates could bring reach seats into play. On the Democratic side, there’s hope Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) and former Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.) can catch fire against conservative Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.).

Nella Domenici, the daughter of New Mexico’s last GOP senator, just launched a run in her typically blue state. And Republicans are always dreaming of big names like Glenn Youngkin in Virginia, though Daines said he hasn’t talked to the Virginia governor about it.

A progressive icon’s big decision

Vermont is no battleground, but it is the home of the highest-profile liberal senator in Congress: Bernie Sanders.

The two-time presidential candidate teased this month that he will make an announcement in the “near future” about his plans. Sanders will be 83 on Election Day, but it would be wrong to assume he’s retiring because of his age — he’s only gained political power since his torrid presidential campaigns in 2016 and 2020, becoming Health, Education, Labor and Pensions chair.

“I hope he runs. He’s special. He’s played a special role in the country and a special role in American politics and certainly in Vermont,” said Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

If Sanders were to retire, it would leave a void in the progressive movement’s leadership. The gruff liberal is more willing than most in the Senate Democratic caucus to challenge President Joe Biden or other party leaders over hot-button topics, ranging from arming Israel to endorsing primary challenges against his colleagues.

That propensity has seemingly endeared him to voters; Welch called him the “the most popular politician in the country.”

Louisiana’s Legislature has passed a new congressional map, brushing off opposition from the Bayou State’s own Speaker Mike Johnson and positioning Democrats to pick up an additional seat in the midterms.

The Louisiana Legislature finalized the map Friday. GOP Gov. Jeff Landry is expected to sign it into law soon.

The new map was spurred by a 2022 federal court ruling that the state’s congressional lines likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting power of Black Louisianans. The 2022 midterms, which used the soon-to-be-former map, saw five white Republicans and one Black Democrat elected in a state where Black residents represent roughly a third of the population.

The court ordered the state to draw a second majority-Black district. The Louisiana Legislature complied, sacrificing Rep. Garret Graves’ (R-La.) seat and drawing a new district that snakes from northwest Louisiana all the way down to East Baton Rouge.

The new 6th district now has a majority-Black voting age population and will almost assuredly elect a Democratic representative later this year.

In doing so, the Legislature brushed off Johnson, who in a statement earlier this week had urged state lawmakers to continue fighting the court order. That likely would have resulted in a court-drawn map for the 2024 elections. The speaker also suggested the Legislature could draw a map that does “not require the unnecessary surrender of a Republican seat in Congress.”

Republican state lawmakers stressed that they believed that if they had not drawn a map now with a second majority-Black district, the court would have dictated the map itself without their input. Legislators there said they prioritized protecting Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Rep. Julia Letlow (R-La.), the only woman in the delegation.

Graves has publicly complained that the new map would not withstand scrutiny in the courts, particularly due to the shape of the new district. But with its passage — which had bipartisan support in the state Legislature — Graves finds himself without a natural political home base.